Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Mastering the genre of English emails: A linguistic analysis of learner uptake in an on-line learning environment Cover

Mastering the genre of English emails: A linguistic analysis of learner uptake in an on-line learning environment

Open Access
|Dec 2025

References

  1. Al-Ali, M., & Sahawneh, M. (2008). An investigation into the generic features of English requestive email messages. LSP & Professional Communication, 8(2), 40–64.
  2. Bàron Pàres, J. (2015). “Can I make a party, mum?” The development of requests from childhood to adolescence. ATLANTIS: Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies, 37(1), 179–198.
  3. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic versus grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 32(2), 233–259. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587583
  4. Barón, J., & Ortega, M. (2018). Investigating age differences in email pragmatic performance. System, 78, 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.08.001
  5. Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2007). Students writing emails to faculty: An examination of e-politeness among native and non-native speakers of English. Language Learning & Technology, 11(2), 59–81.
  6. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics, 4). Cambridge University Press.
  7. Campbell, K. (2013, March 7). The genre of email requests. ProsWrite. https://proswrite.com/author/proswrite/
  8. Carstens, A., & Fletcher, L. (2009). Evaluating the effectiveness of a cross-disciplinary genre-focused writing intervention. Journal for Language Teaching, 43(1), 54–65.
  9. EDK. (2014). Lehrplan 21. https://www.lehrplan21.ch/
  10. EFL. (2024). How to use EFL/ESL mobile apps to support language learning. EFLCafe.net. https://eflcafe.net/how-to-use-efl-esl-mobile-apps-to-support-language-learning/
  11. Economidou-Kogetsidis, M. (2011). “Please answer me as soon as possible”: Pragmatic failure in non-native speakers' email requests to faculty. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(13), 3193–3215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.006
  12. Ellis, R. (1997). Second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
  13. Europarat. (2020). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – Companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing. https://www.coe.int/lang-cefr
  14. Fleckenstein, J., Jansen, T., Meyer, J., Trüb, R., Raubach, E., & Keller, S. (2024). How am I going? Behavioral engagement mediates the effect of individual feedback on writing performance. Learning and Instruction, 93, 101977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101977
  15. Godwin-Jones, R. (2011). Emerging technologies: Mobile apps for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 15(2), 2–11.
  16. Graham, S., Cao, Y., Kim, Y. S. G., et al. (2024). Effective writing instruction for students in grades 6 to 12: A best evidence meta-analysis. Reading and Writing, 38, 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10539-2
  17. Graham, S., Hebert, M., & Harris, K. R. (2015). Formative assessment and writing: A meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 523–547. https://doi.org/10.1086/681947
  18. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
  19. Horbach, A., Laarmann-Quante, R., Liebenow, L., Jansen, T., Keller, S., Meyer, J., Zesch, T., & Fleckenstein, J. (2023). Bringing automatic scoring into the classroom: Measuring the impact of automated analytic feedback on student writing performance. In Proceedings of the Swedish Language Technology Conference (SLTC) and NLP4CALL (pp. 72–83).
  20. Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  21. Keller, S., Trüb, R., Raubach, E., Meyer, J., Jansen, T., & Fleckenstein, J. (2023). Designing and validating an assessment rubric for writing emails in English as a foreign language. Research in Subject-matter Teaching and Learning, 16–48. https://doi.org/10.2478/ristal-2023-0002
  22. KMK. (2023). Bildungsstandards für die erste Fremdsprache (Englisch/Französisch) für den Mittleren Schulabschluss [Educational standards for the first foreign language (English/French) for middle school]. Kultusministerkonferenz.
  23. Kultusministerkonferenz (KMK). (2023b). Bildungsstandards für die erste Fremdsprache (Englisch/Französisch) für den Ersten Schulabschluss und den Mittleren Schulabschluss. https://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/veroeffentlichungen_beschluesse/2023/2023_06_22-Bista-ESA-MSA-ErsteFremdsprache.pdf
  24. López-Serrano, S., Martínez-Flor, A., & Sánchez-Hernández, A. (2025). The effects of self-access web-based pragmatic instruction and L2 proficiency on EFL students' email request production and confidence. Languages, 10(11), 279. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages10110279
  25. Meyer, J., Jansen, T., Schiller, R., Liebenow, L., Steinbach, M., Horbach, A., & Fleckenstein, J. (2024). Using LLMs to bring evidence-based feedback into the classroom: AI-generated feedback increases secondary students' text revision, motivation, and positive emotions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100199
  26. Narciss, S. (2018). Feedbackstrategien für interaktive Lernaufgaben. In H. Niegemann & A. Weinberger (Eds.), Lernen mit Bildungstechnologien (Springer Reference Psychologie). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54373-3_35-1
  27. Quasthoff, U., & Kern, F. (2001). Briefe und E-Mails: Linguistische Merkmale und sprachdidaktische Verwendung. Deutschunterricht, 54(4), 16–21.
  28. Riley, J., & Reedy, D. (2000). Developing writing for different purposes: Teaching about genre in the early years. Sage.
  29. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
  30. Schmidt, V., Fiene, C., & Siegmund, A. (2024). Experimentelles Arbeiten im virtuellen Raum zur Vermittlung von Folgen des regionalen Klimawandels – Bedeutung und Potenziale von Feedback. In W. Becker & M. Metz (Eds.), Serious games und Gamification in der schulischen Bildung. Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-44317-7_11
  31. Simpson, J., Branagan, C., Lau Cheng Von, V., & Williams, L. (2024). Spamming our students? The use of email as a mass communication tool in higher education. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 29(3), 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2024.2440705
  32. Sujinpram, N., & Wannaruk, A. (2024). Enhancing business email writing ability through the integration of genre-based approach and data-driven learning. International Journal of Instruction, 17(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2024.17314a
  33. VERBI Software. (2022). MAXQDA 2022 [Computer software]. VERBI Software. https://www.maxqda.com
  34. Yasuda, S. (2011). Genre-based tasks in foreign language writing: Developing writers' genre awareness, linguistic knowledge, and writing competence. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(2), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.02.001
  35. Zhai, X., & Razali, A. B. (2023). Triple method approach to development of a genre-based approach to teaching ESL/EFL writing: A systematic literature review by bibliometric, content, and scientometric analyses. SAGE Open, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221147255
  36. Zhu, W. (2012). Polite requestive strategies in emails: An investigation of pragmatic competence of Chinese EFL learners. RELC Journal, 43(2), 217–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212449936
Language: English
Page range: 27 - 46
Published on: Dec 31, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Stefan D. Keller, Ruth Trüb, Andrea Horbach, Thorben Jansen, Johanna Fleckenstein, published by Gesellschaft für Fachdidaktik (GfD e.V.)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License.