Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
Average error in different materials_
| Material | SiC | PTFE | Graphene | Ni/rGO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Δ̅ [dB] | 6.01 | 7.16 | 6.68 | 7.33 |
Electromagnetic parameters in absorbing materials_
| Material | Relative permittivity ɛr | Relative permeability μr |
|---|---|---|
| Graphene | 4.5 | 1.01 |
| SiC | 4.1 | 0.64 |
| PTFE | 2.01 | 0.95 |
| Ni/rGO | 13.45 | 1.14 |
Comparison of average CPU utilization rate and computational time_
| Computational method | Average CPU utilization rate [%] | Mean calculation time [min] |
|---|---|---|
| The proposed model | 2 | 0.1 |
| CST software | 73 | 43 |