Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Re-using questions in classroom-based assessment: An exploratory study at the undergraduate medical education level Cover

Re-using questions in classroom-based assessment: An exploratory study at the undergraduate medical education level

Open Access
|Nov 2018

References

  1. 1.
    Jozefowicz RF Koeppen BM Case S Galbraith R Swanson D Glew RH The quality of in-house medical school examinations Acad Med 2002 77 156 161 10.1097/00001888-200202000-00016
  2. 2.
    Holmboe ES Sherbino J Long DM Swing SR Frank JR The role of assessment in competency-based medical education Med Teach 2010 32 676 682 10.3109/0142159X.2010.500704
  3. 3.
    Norman G Norcini J Bordage G Competency-based education: milestones or millstones? J Grad Med Educ 2014 6 1 6 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00445.1
  4. 4.
    Wiliam D What is assessment for learning? Stud Educ Eval 2011 37 3 14 10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
  5. 5.
    Haladyna TM Downing SM Rodriguez MC A review of multiple-choice item-writing guidelines for classroom assessment Appl Meas Educ 2002 15 309 334 10.1207/S15324818AME1503_5
  6. 6.
    Wallach PM Crespo LM Holtzman KZ Galbraith RM Swanson DB Use of a committee review process to improve the quality of course examinations Adv. Health. Sci. Educ. Theory. Pract. 2006 11 61 68 10.1007/s10459-004-7515-8
  7. 7.
    Vachon-Lachiver E St-Onge C Cloutier J Farand P La rédaction de questions à choix multiple et de questions à réponse ouverte et courte pour les examens écrits dans les programmes de formation en santé: une étude docimologique des consignes de rédaction Pedagog. Med. 2017 18 55 64
  8. 8.
    Wagner-Menghin M Preusche I Schmidts M The effects of reusing written test items: a study using the Rasch model ISRN Educ. 2013 10.1155/2013/585420
  9. 9.
    Varpio L Aschenbrener C Bates J Tackling wicked problems: how theories of agency can provide new insights Med Educ 2017 51 353 365 10.1111/medu.13160
  10. 10.
    O’Neill TR Sun L Peabody MR Royal KD The impact of repeated exposure to items Teach Learn Med 2015 27 404 409 10.1080/10401334.2015.1077131
  11. 11.
    Haladyna TM Rodriguez MC Developing and validating test items 2013 New York Routledge 10.4324/9780203850381
  12. 12.
    Smith RW Prometric T The impact of braindump sites on item exposure and item parameter drift 2004
  13. 13.
    Veerkamp WJJ Glas CAW Detection of known items in adaptive testing with a statistical quality control method J Educ Behav Stat 2000 25 373 389 10.3102/10769986025004373
  14. 14.
    Baldwin JDC Daugherty SR Rowley BD Schwarz MD Cheating in medical school: a survey of second-year students at 31 schools Acad Med 1996 71 267 273 10.1097/00001888-199603000-00020
  15. 15.
    Gotzmann A De Champlain A Homayra F Cheating in OSCes: the impact of simulated security breaches on OSCE performance Teach Learn Med 2017 29 52 58 10.1080/10401334.2016.1202832
  16. 16.
    Downing SM Threats to the validity of locally developed multiple-choice tests in medical education: construct-irrelevant variance and construct underrepresentation Adv. Health. Sci. Educ. Theory. Pract. 2002 7 235 241 10.1023/A:1021112514626
  17. 17.
    Sierles F Hendrickx I Cheating in medical school Acad Med 1980 55 124 125 10.1097/00001888-198002000-00006
  18. 18.
    Rennie SC Crosby JR Are ‘tomorrow’s doctors’ honest? Questionnaire study exploring medical students’ attitudes and reported behaviour on academic misconduct BMJ 2001 322 274 275 10.1136/bmj.322.7281.274
  19. 19.
    Hrabak M Vujaklija A Vodopivec I Hren D Marušić M Marušić A Academic misconduct among medical students in a post-communist country Med Educ 2004 38 276 285 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2004.01766.x
  20. 20.
    Henning MA Ram S Malpas P Shulruf B Kelly F Hawken SJ Academic dishonesty and ethical reasoning: pharmacy and medical school students in New Zealand Med Teach 2013 35 e1211 e1217 10.3109/0142159X.2012.737962
  21. 21.
    Hafeez K Khan ML Jawaid M Haroon S Academic misconduct among students in medical colleges of Karachi, Pakistan Pak. J. Med. Sci. 2013 29 699 10.12669/pjms.293.3300
  22. 22.
    Raymond MR Neustel S Anderson D Retest effects on identical and parallel forms in certification and licensure testing Pers Psychol 2007 60 367 396 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00077.x
  23. 23.
    Wood TJ The effect of reused questions on repeat examinees Adv. Health. Sci. Educ. Theory. Pract. 2009 14 465 473 10.1007/s10459-008-9129-z
  24. 24.
    Raymond MR Neustel S Anderson D Same-form retest effects on credentialing examinations Educ Meas Issues Pract 2009 28 19 27 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00144.x
  25. 25.
    Friedman H Repeat examinations in introductory statistics courses Teach Psychol 1987 14 20 23 10.1207/s15328023top1401_4
  26. 26.
    Geving AM Webb S Davis B Opportunities for repeat testing: practice doesn’t always make perfect Appl. HMR Res. 2005 10 47 56
  27. 27.
    Park YS Yang EB Three controversies over item disclosure in medical licensure examinations Med Educ Online 2015 20 28821 10.3402/meo.v20.28821
  28. 28.
    Reise SP Revicki DA Handbook of item response theory modeling: applications to typical performance assessment 2014 New York Routledge 10.4324/9781315736013
  29. 29.
    Hambleton RK Swaminathan H Rogers HJ Fundamentals of item response theory 1991 Thousand Oaks SAGE
  30. 30.
    Crocker L Algina J Introduction to classical and modern test theory 2006 Boston Cengage Learning
  31. 31.
    IBM Corp SPSS statistics for Windows, version 22.0 2013 Armonk NY
  32. 32.
    Gierl MJ Lai H Evaluating the quality of medical multiple-choice items created with automated processes Med Educ 2013 47 726 733 10.1111/medu.12202
  33. 33.
    Gierl M Hollis L Zhang X Automatic item generation Encyclopedia of information science and technology 2018 4 Hershey IGI Global 2369 2379 10.4018/978-1-5225-2255-3.ch206
  34. 34.
    Gierl MJ, Zhou J, Alves C. Developing a taxonomy of item model types to promote assessment engineering. J Technol Learn Assess. 2008;7. https://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/jtla/article/view/1629/1664
  35. 35.
    Pugh D De Champlain A Gierl M Lai H Touchie C Using cognitive models to develop quality multiple-choice questions Med Teach 2016 38 838 843 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1150989
  36. 36.
    Gierl MJ Lai H Turner SR Using automatic item generation to create multiple-choice test items Med Educ 2012 46 757 765 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04289.x
Language: English
Published on: Nov 12, 2018
Published by: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Sébastien Xavier Joncas, Christina St-Onge, Sylvie Bourque, Paul Farand, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.