Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Students as stakeholders in assessment: how students perceive the value of an assessment Cover

Students as stakeholders in assessment: how students perceive the value of an assessment

Open Access
|Nov 2018

References

  1. 1.
    Eva KW Armson H Holmboe E Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: on the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes Adv Health Sci Educ 2012 17 15 26 10.1007/s10459-011-9290-7
  2. 2.
    Nicol DJ Macfarlane-Dick D Formative assessment and self-regulated learning : a model and seven principles of good feedback practice Stud High Educ 2006 31 199 218 10.1080/03075070600572090
  3. 3.
    Tamblyn R Abrahamowicz M Brailovsky C Association between licensing examination scores and resource use and quality of care in primary care practice JAMA 1998 280 989 996 10.1001/jama.280.11.989
  4. 4.
    Tamblyn R Abrahamowicz M Dauphinee D Physician scores on a national clinical skills examination as predictors of complaints to medical regulatory authorities JAMA 2007 298 993 1001 10.1001/jama.298.9.993
  5. 5.
    Tamblyn R Abrahamowicz M Dauphinee WD Association between lincensure examination scores and practice in primary care JAMA 2002 288 3019 3026 10.1001/jama.288.23.3019
  6. 6.
    Boud D Sustainable assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning society Stud Contin Educ 2000 22 151 167 10.1080/713695728
  7. 7.
    Gipps CV Beyond testing: towards a theory of educational assessment 1994 Philadelphia, PA Psychology Press
  8. 8.
    Shepard AL The role of assessment in a learning culture Educ Res 2000 29 4 14 10.3102/0013189X029007004
  9. 9.
    Eva KW Bordage G Campbell C Towards a program of assessment for health professionals: from training into practice Adv Health Sci Educ 2016 21 897 913 10.1007/s10459-015-9653-6
  10. 10.
    Martinez ME Lipson JI Assessment for learning Educ Leadersh 1989 46 73 75
  11. 11.
    Rushton A Formative assessment: a key to deep learning? Med Teach 2005 27 509 513 10.1080/01421590500129159
  12. 12.
    Schuwirth LWT Van der Vleuten CPM Programmatic assessment: From assessment of learning to assessment for learning Med Teach 2011 33 478 485 10.3109/0142159X.2011.565828
  13. 13.
    Duffield K Spencer J A survey of medical students’ views about the purposes and fairness of assessment Med Educ 2002 36 879 886 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01291.x
  14. 14.
    Norcini J Anderson B Bollela V Criteria for good assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the ottawa 2010 conference Med Teach 2011 33 206 214 10.3109/0142159X.2011.551559
  15. 15.
    Norcini JJ McKinley DW Assessment methods in medical education Teach Teach Educ 2007 23 239 250 10.1016/j.tate.2006.12.021
  16. 16.
    Van der Vleuten CPM The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications Adv Health Sci Educ 1996 1 41 67 10.1007/BF00596229
  17. 17.
    Hill D Guinea A McCarthy W Formative assessment: a student perspective Med Educ 1994 28 394 399 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1994.tb02550.x
  18. 18.
    Stefani LA Assessment in partnership with learners Assess Eval High Educ 1998 23 339 350 10.1080/0260293980230402
  19. 19.
    Yorke M Formative assessment in higher education: moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice High Educ 2003 45 477 10.1023/A:1023967026413
  20. 20.
    Epstein RM Assessment in medical education N Engl J Med 2007 356 387 396 10.1056/NEJMra054784
  21. 21.
    Barclay LJ Skarlicki DP Pugh SD Exploring the role of emotions in injustice perceptions and retaliation J Appl Psychol 2005 90 629 10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.629
  22. 22.
    De Cremer D Van Knippenberg B Van Knippenberg D Mullenders D Stinglhamber F Rewarding leadership and fair procedures as determinants of self-esteem J Appl Psychol 2005 90 3 10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.3
  23. 23.
    Higgins RS Bridges J Burke JM O’Donnell MA Cohen NM Wilkes SB Implementing the ACGME general competencies in a cardiothoracic surgery residency program using 360-degree feedback Ann Thorac Surg 2004 77 12 17 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.09.075
  24. 24.
    Messick S Linn RL Validity Educational measurement 1989 New York Macmillan 13 103
  25. 25.
    American Educational Research Association American Psychological Association National Council on Measurement in Education Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Standards for educational and psychological testing 1999 Washington, DC AERA
  26. 26.
    Downing SM Validity: on the meaningful interpretation of assessment data Med Educ 2003 37 830 837 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01594.x
  27. 27.
    Cook DA Beckman TJ Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application Am J Med 2006 119 166 166e7 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.036
  28. 28.
    Kane MT Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores J Educ Meas 2013 50 1 73 10.1111/jedm.12000
  29. 29.
    DeVellis RF Scale development: theory and applications 2012 Thousand Oaks SAGE
  30. 30.
    Mundfrom DJ Shaw DG Ke LT Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analysis Int J Testing 2005 5 159 168 10.1207/s15327574ijt0502_4
  31. 31.
    Sandelowski M Focus on research methods-whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health 2000 23 334 340 10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<;334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
  32. 32.
    Greene JC Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology? J Mix Methods Res 2008 2 7 22 10.1177/1558689807309969
  33. 33.
    Ebel RL Frisbie DA Essentials of educational measurement 1991 Englewood Cliffs Prentice-Hall
  34. 34.
    Brett JF Atwater LE 360° feedback: accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness J Appl Psychol 2001 86 930 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.930
  35. 35.
    Dipboye RL de Pontbriand R Correlates of employee reactions to performance appraisals and appraisal systems J Appl Psychol 1981 66 248 10.1037/0021-9010.66.2.248
  36. 36.
    Sargeant J Mann K Sinclair D Van der Vleuten C Metsemakers J Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use Adv Health Sci Educ 2008 13 275 288 10.1007/s10459-006-9039-x
  37. 37.
    Gielen S Dochy F Dierick S Segers M Dochy F Cascallar E Evaluating the consequential validity of new modes of assessment: The influence of assessment on learning, including pre-, post-, and true assessment effects Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards 2003 Dordrecht Kluwer 37 54 10.1007/0-306-48125-1_3
  38. 38.
    Van der Vleuten CPM Schuwirth LWT Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes Med Educ 2005 39 309 317 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02094.x
  39. 39.
    Watling CJ Kenyon CF Zibrowski EM Rules of engagement: residents’ perceptions of the in-training evaluation process Acad Med 2008 83 S97 100 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318183e78c
  40. 40.
    Watling CJ Lingard L Toward meaningful evaluation of medical trainees: the influence of participants’ perceptions of the process Adv Health Sci Educ 2012 17 183 194 10.1007/s10459-010-9223-x
  41. 41.
    Isaacson J Posk L Litaker D Halperin A Resident perception of the evaluation process J Gen Intern Med 1995 10 S89 10.1007/BF02600234
  42. 42.
    Solomon DJ Conducting web-based surveys Pract Assess Res Eval 2001 7 1 4
Language: English
Published on: Nov 12, 2018
Published by: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Michelle Ricci, Christina St-Onge, Jing Xiao, Meredith Young, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.