Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Between Innovation and Skepticism: How Pre-Service Teachers Perceive the Integration of GenAI Chatbots Cover

Between Innovation and Skepticism: How Pre-Service Teachers Perceive the Integration of GenAI Chatbots

Open Access
|Sep 2026

References

  1. Ait Baha, T., El Hajji, M., Es-Saady, Y., & Fadili, H. (2023). The impact of educational chatbot on student learning experience. Education and Information Technologies, 1–24. 10.1007/s10639-023-12166-w
  2. Al Darayseh, A. (2023). Acceptance of artificial intelligence in teaching science: Science teachers’ perspective. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100132. 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100132
  3. Alvarez, L., Ortoleva, G., Widmer, D. S., Fritz, M., Bugmann, J., Boéchat-Heer, S., & Ramillon, C. (2024). Future teachers’ beliefs about generative AI. Assessing technology acceptance as students or as aspiring professionals. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 32(3), 383–408. 10.70725/379206cljimb
  4. An, X., Chai, C. S., Li, Y., Zhou, Y., Shen, X., Zheng, C., & Chen, M. (2023). Modeling English teachers’ behavioral intention to use artificial intelligence in middle schools. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 5187–5208. 10.1007/s10639-022-11286-z
  5. Belda-Medina, J., & Calvo-Ferrer, J. R. (2022). Using chatbots as AI conversational partners in language learning. Applied Sciences, 12(17), 8427. 10.3390/app12178427
  6. Bui, P., Korhonen, T., Kontkanen, S., Karme, S., Piispa-Hakala, S., & Veermans, M. (2025). Exploring pre-service teachers’ generative AI readiness and behavioral intentions: A pilot study. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 13(1), 8. 10.31129/LUMAT.13.1.2755
  7. Chang, C. Y., Kuo, S. Y., & Hwang, G. H. (2022). Chatbot-facilitated nursing education. Educational Technology & Society, 25(1), 15–27.
  8. Choi, S., Jang, Y., & Kim, H. (2023). Influence of pedagogical beliefs and perceived trust on teachers’ acceptance of educational artificial intelligence tools. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(4), 910–922. 10.1080/10447318.2022.2049145
  9. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319–340. 10.2307/249008
  10. Deng, X., & Yu, Z. (2023). A meta-analysis and systematic review of the effect of chatbot technology use in sustainable education. Sustainability, 15(4), 2940. 10.3390/su15042940
  11. Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Román-Graván, P., Reyes-Rebollo, M. M., & Montenegro-Rueda, M. (2021). Impact of educational technology on teacher stress and anxiety: A literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 548. 10.3390/ijerph18020548
  12. Granić, A. (2022). Educational technology adoption: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 9725–9744. 10.1007/s10639-022-10951-7
  13. Hu, P. J. H., Clark, T. H., & Ma, W. W. (2003). Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: A longitudinal study. Information & Management, 41(2), 227–241. 10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00050-8
  14. Klímová, B., & Ibna Seraj, P. M. (2023). The use of chatbots in university EFL settings: Research trends and pedagogical implications. Frontiers in psychology, 14, 1131506. 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1131506
  15. McGehee, N. (2024). Meta-analysis of educator acceptance of AI: Trends, predictors, and professional learning implications. Michigan Virtual. May 30, 2025, https://michiganvirtual.org/research
  16. Molefi, R. R., Ayanwale, M. A., Kurata, L., & Chere-Masopha, J. (2024). Do in-service teachers accept artificial intelligence-driven technology? The mediating role of school support and resources. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100191. 10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100191
  17. Nang, A. F. M., Maat, S. M., & Mahmud, M. S. (2022). Teacher technostress and coping mechanisms during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 12(2), 200–212. 10.47750/pegegog.12.02.20
  18. Nee, C. K., Rahman, M. H. A., Yahaya, N., Ibrahim, N. H., Razak, R. A., & Sugino, C. (2023). Exploring the Trend and Potential Distribution of Chatbot in Education: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(3), 516–525. 10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.3.1834
  19. Sadaf, A., & Gezer, T. (2020). Exploring factors that influence teachers’ intentions to integrate digital literacy using the decomposed theory of planned behavior. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 36(2), 124–145. 10.1080/21532974.2020.1719244
  20. Sun, J., Wu, Q., Ma, Z., Zheng, W., & Hu, Y. (2025). Understanding pre-service teachers’ acceptance of generative artificial intelligence: an extended technology acceptance model approach. Educational technology research and development, 1–23. 10.1007/s11423-025-10495-w
  21. Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65, 555–575. 10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
  22. UNESCO. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO. https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/files/unesco_ai_competency_framework_for_teachers.pdf
  23. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  24. Wang, Y., Pi, T., & Xie, B. (2025). Exploring factors influencing pre-service teachers’ intention to use ChatGPT. Education and Information Technologies, 30(16), 23761–23790. 10.1007/s10639-025-13621-6
  25. Weng, F., Yang, R. J., Ho, H. J., & Su, H. M. (2018). A TAM-based study of the attitude towards use intention of multimedia among school teachers. Applied system innovation, 1(3), 36. 10.3390/asi1030036
  26. Wollny, S., Schneider, J., Di Mitri, D., Weidlich, J., Rittberger, M., & Drachsler, H. (2021). Are we there yet? – A systematic literature review on chatbots in education. Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 4, 654924. 10.3389/frai.2021.654924
  27. Xu, Y., Zhu, J., Wang, M., Qian, F., Yang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2024). The impact of a digital game-based AI chatbot on students’ academic performance, higher-order thinking, and behavioral patterns in an information technology curriculum. Applied Sciences, 14(15), 6418. 10.3390/app14156418
  28. Yang, D., Liu, J., Wang, H., Chen, P., Wang, C., & Metwally, A. H. S. (2025). Technostress among teachers: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Computers in Human Behavior, 156, 108196. 10.1016/j.chb.2025.108619
  29. Zhang, C., Schießl, J., Plößl, L., Hofmann, F., & Gläser-Zikuda, M. (2023). Acceptance of artificial intelligence among pre-service teachers: A multigroup analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 49. 10.1186/s41239-023-00420-7
  30. Zou, D., & Huang, Y. (2025). Design language learning with artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots based on activity theory from a systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 12(1), Article 4. 10.1186/s40561-025-00379-0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.65043/eurodl.193 | Journal eISSN: 1027-5207
Language: English
Page range: 11 - 11
Submitted on: Jan 17, 2026
Accepted on: Sep 7, 2026
Published on: Sep 22, 2026
Published by: EDEN Digital Learning Europe
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2026 Adi Yaakov-Azaria, Guy Cohen, Anat Cohen, published by EDEN Digital Learning Europe
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.