Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Design-Based Research Approach to What Distance Learners Expect and Value from an Institutional AI Digital Assistant Cover

A Design-Based Research Approach to What Distance Learners Expect and Value from an Institutional AI Digital Assistant

Open Access
|Jun 2025

References

  1. Adelana, O. P., Ayanwale, M. A., & Sanusi, I. T. (2024). Exploring pre-service biology teachers’ intention to teach genetics using an AI intelligent tutoring – based system. Cogent Education, 11(1). 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2310976
  2. Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-Based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 1625. 10.3102/0013189x11428813
  3. Bektik, D., Ullmann, T., Edwards, C., Herodotou, C., & Whitelock, D. (2024). AI-Powered Curricula: Unpacking the Potential and Progress of Generative Technologies in Education. Paper presented at EDEN 2024 Annual Conference, Graz, Austria. 10.5334/uproc.160
  4. Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., Negrea, V., Oxley, E., Pham, P., Chong, S. W., & Siemens, G. (2024). A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: a call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour. Int J Educ Technol High Educ, 21(1), 4. 10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z
  5. Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2023). Challenging the status quo and exploring the new boundaries in the age of algorithms: Reimagining the role of generative AI in distance education and online learning. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 18. 10.5281/zenodo.7755273
  6. Chung, J., Henderson, M., Pepperell, N., Slade, C., & Liang, Y. (2024). Student perspectives on AI in Higher Education: Student Survey. Student perspectives on AI in Higher Education: Student Survey. Monash University. Standard. 10.26180/27915930
  7. Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., Gašević, D., & Siemens, G. (2024). Impact of AI assistance on student agency. Computers & Education, 210, 104967. 10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104967
  8. Freeman, J. (2024). Provide or punish? Students’ views on generative AI in higher education. https://www.hepi.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/HEPI-Policy-Note-51.pdf
  9. Giannakos, M., Azevedo, R., Brusilovsky, P., Cukurova, M., Dimitriadis, Y., Hernandez-Leo, D., Järvelä, S., Mavrikis, M., & Rienties, B. (2024). The promise and challenges of generative AI in education. Behaviour & Information Technology, 127. 10.1080/0144929X.2024.2394886
  10. Hamilton, A., Wiliam, D., & Hattie, J. (2023). The Future of AI in Education: 13 Things We Can Do to Minimize the Damage. 10.35542/osf.io/372vr
  11. Hoadley, C. (2004). Methodological Alignment in Design-Based Research. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 203212. 10.1207/s15326985ep3904_2
  12. Hoadley, C., & Campos, F. C. (2022). Design-based research: What it is and why it matters to studying online learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 207220. 10.1080/00461520.2022.2079128
  13. Iniesto, F., Coughlan, T., Lister, K., Devine, P., Freear, N., Greenwood, R., Holmes, W., Kenny, I., McLeod, K., & Tudor, R. (2023). Creating ‘a Simple Conversation’: Designing a Conversational User Interface to Improve the Experience of Accessing Support for Study. ACM Trans. Access. Comput., 16(1), Article 6. 10.1145/3568166
  14. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. 10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
  15. Mikroyannidis, A., Sharma, N., Ekuban, A., & Domingue, J. (2024). Using Generative AI and ChatGPT for improving the production of distance learning materials. Paper presented at 24th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2024), Near East University, Nicosia, North Cyprus. 10.1109/ICALT61570.2024.00061
  16. Morgan, D. L. (2023). Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Qualitative Data Analysis: The Case of ChatGPT. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. 10.1177/16094069231211248
  17. Nguyen, Q., Rienties, B., & Richardson, J. T. E. (2020). Learning analytics to uncover inequality in behavioural engagement and academic attainment in a distance learning setting. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 594606. 10.1080/02602938.2019.1679088
  18. Ravšelj, D., Keržič, D., Tomaževič, N., Umek, L., Brezovar, N., Iahad, N. A., Abdulla, A. A., Akopyan, A., Aldana Segura, M. W., AlHumaid, J., Allam, M. F., Alló, M., Andoh, R. P. K., Andronic, O., Arthur, Y. D., Aydın, F., Badran, A., Balbontín-Alvarado, R., Ben Saad, H., … Aristovnik, A. (2025). Higher education students’ perceptions of ChatGPT: A global study of early reactions. PLOS One, 20(2), e0315011. 10.1371/journal.pone.0315011
  19. Richards, M., Waugh, K., Slaymaker, M., Petre, M., Woodthorpe, J., & Gooch, D. (2024). Bob or Bot: Exploring ChatGPT’s answers to University Computer Science Assessment. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 24(1), 132. 10.1145/3633287
  20. Rienties, B., Domingue, J., Duttaroy, S., Herodotou, C., Tessarolo, F., & Whitelock, D. (2024a). What distance learning students want from an AI Digital Assistant. Distance Education, 46(2), 173189. 10.1080/01587919.2024.2338717
  21. Rienties, B., Herodotou, C., Tessarolo, F., Domingue, J., Duttaroy, S., & Whitelock, D. (2024b). An institutional AI digital assistant: what do distance learners expect and value? Ubiquity Proceedings. 10.5334/uproc.129
  22. Rienties, B., & Ramanau, R. (2025). ‘It’s extremely weird to understand UK culture when you don’t live there and just study from abroad’: an empirical investigation of internationalisation at a distance perspectives. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(2), 947966 10.1111/bjet.13542
  23. Rienties, B., & Townsend, D. (2012). Integrating ICT in business education: using TPACK to reflect on two course redesigns. In P. Van den Bossche, W. H. Gijselaers & R. G. Milter (Eds.), Learning at the Crossroads of Theory and Practice (Vol. 4, pp. 141156). Springer. 10.1007/978-94-007-2846-2_10
  24. Shibani, A., Knight, S., Kitto, K., Karunanayake, A., & Buckingham Shum, S. (2024). Untangling Critical Interaction with AI in Students’ Written Assessment. In Extended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Article 357, 16). Association for Computing Machinery. New York, NY, USA. 10.1145/3613905.3651083
  25. Strzelecki, A. (2023). To use or not to use ChatGPT in higher education? A study of students’ acceptance and use of technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(9), 51425155. 10.1080/10494820.2023.2209881
  26. Yan, L., Sha, L., Zhao, L., Li, Y., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Chen, G., Li, X., Jin, Y., & Gašević, D. (2024). Practical and ethical challenges of large language models in education: A systematic scoping review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 551, 90112. 10.1111/bjet.13370
DOI: https://doi.org/10.65043/eurodl.154 | Journal eISSN: 1027-5207
Language: English
Page range: 4 - 4
Submitted on: Sep 18, 2024
Accepted on: Apr 24, 2025
Published on: Jun 13, 2025
Published by: EDEN Digital Learning Europe
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Bart Rienties, Felipe Tessarolo, Tim Coughlan, Christothea Herodotou, John Domingue, Denise Whitelock, published by EDEN Digital Learning Europe
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.