Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Learning in Context: Faculty Adoption of Blended Learning Through Socio-Constructivist and Ecological Lenses Cover

Learning in Context: Faculty Adoption of Blended Learning Through Socio-Constructivist and Ecological Lenses

Open Access
|Nov 2025

References

  1. Adarkwah, M. A. (2021). “I’m not against online teaching, but what about us?”: ICT in Ghana post COVID-19. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 16651685. 10.1007/s10639-020-10331-z
  2. Adarkwah, M. A., & Huang, R. (2023). Blended learning for the “multi-track” undergraduate students in Ghana in an adverse era. Scientific African, 21, e01772. 10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01772
  3. Agormedah, E., Henaku, E., Ayite, D. M., & Ansah, A. E. (2020). Online learning in higher education during COVID-19 pandemic: A case of Ghana. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 3(3), 183210. 10.31681/jetol.726441
  4. Akbaba Altun, S., & Turan Bora, H. (2024). Voices from the field: What do Turkish students suggest? A socio-ecological study on school belonging. Child Indicators Research, 17(3), 13291354. 10.1007/s12187-024-10130-9
  5. Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Three different design approaches. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4). 10.14742/ajet.693
  6. Alamri, H. A., Watson, S., & Watson, W. (2021). Learning technology models that support personalization within blended learning environments in higher education. TechTrends, 65(1), 6278. 10.1007/s11528-020-00530-3
  7. Anderson, J., Sadiq, A., & Anderson, A. (2024). The Routledge international handbook of equity and inclusion in education. Routledge.
  8. Antwi-Boampong, A. (2018). Institutional perspective of drivers influencing the adoption of blended learning in higher education: The case of Ghana Technology University College. In EDULEARN18 Proceedings (pp. 93629373). 10.21125/edulearn.2018.2211
  9. Antwi-Boampong, A. (2019). Towards a faculty blended learning adoption model for higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 16391662. 10.1007/s10639-019-10019-z
  10. Antwi-Boampong, A. (2020). Towards a faculty blended learning adoption model for higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 16391662. 10.1007/s10639-019-10019-z
  11. Antwi-Boampong, A. (2021). An investigation into barriers impacting against faculty blended learning adoption. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 281292. 10.17718/tojde.961849
  12. Antwi-Boampong, A. (2022). Testing and validating a faculty blended learning adoption model. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 851921. 10.3389/feduc.2022.851921
  13. Antwi-Boampong, A. (2023). Transitioning into fully blended learning: A model for faculty blended learning adoption. Nordic and Baltic Journal of Information & Communications Technologies, 1, 136. 10.13052/nbjict1902-097X.2023.001
  14. Antwi-Boampong, A., & Bokolo, A. J. (2021). Towards an institutional blended learning adoption model for higher education institutions. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(4), 10811100. 10.1007/s10758-021-09542-2
  15. Aristovnik, A., Karampelas, K., Umek, L., & Ravšelj, D. (2023). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on online learning in higher education: A bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1225834. 10.3389/feduc.2023.1225834
  16. Asamoah, M. K., & Oheneba-Sakyi, Y. (2024). Factors influencing the willingness and reluctance of lecturers to embrace learning management systems in two selected Ghanaian universities. E-Learning and Digital Media, 21(4), 387405. 10.1177/20427530231156172
  17. Asunka, S. (2013). Overcoming Barriers to Instructor Adoption of a Learning Management System: The Case of Regent University College in Ghana. In A. Ritzhaupt & S. Kumar (Eds.), Cases on Educational Technology Implementation for Facilitating Learning (pp. 239252). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. 10.4018/978-1-4666-3676-7.ch014
  18. Bayrak Karsli, M., & Karaman, S. (2022). Investigation of tendency among instructors to conduct a massive open online course: Case of Turkey. Open Praxis, 14(3), 214229. 10.55982/openpraxis.14.3.476
  19. Behara, K., Matthew, S., & Magenuka, T. K. (2024, December). Reimagining engineering education: An ecological systems approach to integrating educational. In Proceedings of the Focus Conference (TFC 2024) (Vol. 31, p. 393). Springer Nature. 10.2991/978-94-6463-630-7_22
  20. Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & McKenney, S. (2020). Conjecture mapping to support vocationally educated adult learners in open-ended tasks. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(3), 430470. 10.1080/10508406.2020.1759605
  21. Boelens, R., Voet, M., & De Wever, B. (2018). The design of blended learning in response to student diversity in higher education: Instructors’ views and use of differentiated instruction in blended learning. Computers & Education, 120, 197212. 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.009
  22. Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 120. 10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x
  23. Boyle, C. (2023). Reviewing a 5-year grant-funded campus OER initiative: Reflections, successes, and challenges. Open Praxis, 15(3), 226234. 10.55982/openpraxis.15.3.562
  24. Bozkurt, A. (2024). GenAI et al.: Cocreation, Authorship, Ownership, Academic Ethics and Integrity in a Time of Generative AI. Open Praxis, 16(1), 110. 10.55982/openpraxis.16.1.654
  25. Brenya, B. (2024). Higher education in emergency situations: Blended learning prospects and challenges for educators in developing countries. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(4), 10151028. 10.1108/JARHE-01-2023-0044
  26. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press. 10.4159/9780674028845
  27. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2007). The bioecological model of human development. Handbook of Child Psychology, 1. 10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0114
  28. Charmaz, K. (2015). Grounded theory: Methodology and theory construction. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 10, pp. 402407). Elsevier. 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.44029-8
  29. Clarke, E., & Visser, J. (2019). Pragmatic research methodology in education: Possibilities and pitfalls. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 42(5), 455469. 10.1080/1743727X.2018.1524866
  30. Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 321. 10.1007/BF00988593
  31. Daengbuppha, J., Hemmington, N., & Wilkes, K. (2006). Using grounded theory to model visitor experiences at heritage sites: Methodological and practical issues. Qualitative Market Research, 9(4), 367388. 10.1108/13522750610689096
  32. Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: The new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 116. 10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5
  33. Gherghel, C., Yasuda, S., & Kita, Y. (2023). Interaction during online classes fosters engagement with learning and self-directed study both in the first and second years of the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers & Education, 200, Article 104795. 10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104795
  34. Gillen, J. (2000). Versions of Vygotsky. British Journal of Educational Studies, 48(2), 183198. 10.1111/1467-8527.t01-1-00141
  35. Graham, C. R., Borup, J., Pulham, E., & Larsen, R. (2019). K–12 blended teaching readiness: Model and instrument development. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(3), 239258. 10.1080/15391523.2019.1586601
  36. Halverson, L. R., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., & Drysdale, J. S. (2012). An analysis of high impact scholarship and publication trends in blended learning. Distance Education, 33(3), 381413. 10.1080/01587919.2012.723166
  37. Hemphill, M. A., & Wright, P. M. (2024). Transformative social and emotional learning in physical education. Kinesiology Review, 13(2), 252262. 10.1123/kr.2023-0075
  38. Hocevar, C. (2017). Challenges and opportunities: Open educational resources (OERs) at McGill University. Open Praxis, 9(3), 307322. 10.5944/openpraxis.9.3.589
  39. Hofmann, R., Paavola, S., & Rainio, A. P. (2024). Abductive methodology: opening the mystery of generating theory through qualitative inquiry in practice settings. Apollo – University of Cambridge Repository. 10.17863/CAM.109359
  40. Johnson, N., Veletsianos, G., & Seaman, J. (2020). U.S. faculty and administrators’ experiences and approaches in the early weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic. Online Learning Journal, 24(2), 621. 10.24059/olj.v24i2.2285
  41. Kayi, E. A. (2024). Transitioning to blended learning during COVID-19: Exploring instructors and adult learners’ experiences in three Ghanaian universities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(6), 27602786. 10.1111/bjet.13475
  42. Khalil, R. (2013). A re-evaluation of academics’ expectations of preparatory year Egyptian students: A reconstructed understanding. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Educational Studies, 7(1), 55. 10.18848/2327-011X/CGP/v07i01/53230
  43. Kharroubi, S., & ElMediouni, A. (2024). Conceptual review: Cultivating learner autonomy through self-directed learning and self-regulated learning: A socio-constructivist exploration. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 6(2), 276296. 10.36892/ijlls.v6i2.1649
  44. Khodabandelou, R., Yousef, A. M. F., & Elhaj, A. (2025). Affordances and core features of successful digital courses design in higher education. Open Praxis, 17(3), 544560. 10.55982/openpraxis.17.3.890
  45. Loglo, F. S. (2024). Towards digital transformation of selected Ghanaian public universities: Leadership enablers, challenges, and opportunities. Open Praxis, 16(3), 374395. 10.55982/openpraxis.16.3.700
  46. Loglo, F. S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Müskens, W. (2024). Patterns of media usage by higher education students in Germany and Ghana: A cross-country analysis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 19(1). 10.5281/zenodo.10688175
  47. Mesmar, J., Badran, A., & Baydoun, E. (2023). An overview of e-learning and distance education in the higher education landscape: The good, the bad, and the ugly. In Higher Education in the Arab World: E-Learning and Distance Education (pp. 724). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-031-33568-6_2
  48. Mirbagheri, S. M., Atani, A. R., & Parsanejad, M. R. (2024). Conceptualizing collective decision-making in organizations: A grounded theory approach. International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management, 9(1), 6174. 10.22034/IJHCUM.2024.01.06
  49. Morgan, T. (2019). Instructional designers and open education practices: Negotiating the gap between intentional and operational agency. Open Praxis, 11(4), 369380. 10.5944/openpraxis.11.4.1011
  50. Mtebe, J. S. (2020). Examining eLearning system self-efficacy amongst instructors at the University of Dodoma, Tanzania. Open Praxis, 12(3), 343357. 10.5944/openpraxis.12.3.1103
  51. Ozan, Ö., & Özarslan, Y. (2025). Investigating factors influencing faculty members’ digital competence for capacity building on open and distance education in HEIs. Open Praxis, 17(2), 363375. 10.55982/openpraxis.17.2.775
  52. Piki, A., & Brzezinska, M. (2023). Teaching and Learning in the New Normal: Responding to Students’ and Academics’ Multifaceted Needs. In A. Coman & S. Vasilache (Eds.), Social Computing and Social Media. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (vol 14026). Springer, Cham. 10.1007/978-3-031-35927-9_9
  53. Porter, W. W., & Graham, C. R. (2016). Institutional drivers and barriers to faculty adoption of blended learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(4), 748762. 10.1111/bjet.12269
  54. Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Bodily, R. G., & Sandberg, D. S. (2016). A qualitative analysis of institutional drivers and barriers to blended learning adoption in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 28, 1727. 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.08.003
  55. Qazi, M. A., Sharif, M. A., & Akhlaq, A. (2024). Barriers and facilitators to adoption of e-learning in higher education institutions of Pakistan during COVID-19: Perspectives from an emerging economy. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 15(1), 3152. 10.1108/JSTPM-01-2022-0002
  56. Ricciutti, N. M., & Storlie, C. A. (2024). The experiences of clinical mental health counselors treating clients for process/behavioral addictions. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 42(1), 2744. 10.1080/07347324.2023.2267004
  57. Srivastava, B., & Srivastava, S. (2024). Evolution of blended learning: Analyzing historical developments, present innovations, and future trajectories. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(6), 824830. 10.14527/kuey.2024.030
  58. Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological theory, 30(3), 167186. 10.1177/0735275112457914
  59. Ujakpa, M. M. (2020). Developing an expanded Technological Acceptance Model for evaluating e-Learning in the Sub-Saharan African environment (Doctoral dissertation).
  60. Ujakpa, M. M., & Heukelman, D. (2018). Extended Technological Acceptance Model for Evaluating E-learning: The African Context (ETAM-4EEA). In 10th Cape Town International Conference on Education, Business, Humanities and Social Sciences Studies, Cape Town, South Africa. Retrieved from: https://www.eares.org/siteadmin/upload/3350EAP1118444.pdf, https://www.earet.org/proceedingspdf.php.
  61. Ujakpa, M. M., & Heukelman, D. (2020). Expanded Technological Acceptance Model for the Sub-Saharan African Environment. In 18th JOHANNESBURG International Conference on Education, Economics, Humanities & Social Sciences (EEHSS-20) Proceedings, South Africa, Johannesburg (pp. 294301).
  62. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  63. Xiong, Y., Ling, Q., & Li, X. (2021). Ubiquitous e-teaching and e-learning: China’s massive adoption of online education and launching MOOCs internationally during the COVID-19 outbreak. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2021, Article 6358976. 10.1155/2021/6358976
  64. Yulduzxon, S., & Gulmira, M. (2024). Effectiveness of blended learning in education. Spectrum Journal of Innovation, Reforms and Development, 26, 2023.
Language: English
Page range: 803 - 820
Submitted on: Jan 14, 2025
Accepted on: Oct 9, 2025
Published on: Nov 25, 2025
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Ahmed Antwi-Boampong, Martin Mabeifam Ujakpa, David King Boison, Frank Senyo Loglo, Ebenezer Malcalm, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.