Table 1
Data Collection Methods Overview.
| DATA COLLECTION METHOD | DESCRIPTION | PURPOSE |
|---|---|---|
| Semi-Structured Interviews | In-depth interviews with 25 faculty members. | To explore faculty experiences, challenges, and support. |
| Document Analysis | Analysis of institutional documents (e.g., policies). | To understand the institutional context of BL adoption. |
| Participant Observation | Observation of faculty training sessions on BL. | To capture real-time interactions and institutional support. |
Table 2
Participant Demographics Overview.
| DISCIPLINE | NO. OF PARTICIPANTS | SENIOR FACULTY | JUNIOR FACULTY | HIGH DIGITAL LITERACY | MEDIUM DIGITAL LITERACY | LOW DIGITAL LITERACY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Humanities | 8 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| Sciences | 6 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Business | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Technical Fields | 6 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Total | 25 | 16 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 7 |
Figure 1
Constant Comparative Analysis in Grounded Theory.
Interview transcripts (B) Regrouping concepts (C) Identifying the core category
GT Process to Model Faculty Adoption Experiences (Adapted from Daengbuppha et al., 2006).