Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Examining the Self-Efficacy of Pre-service Science Teachers Concerning Digital Material Development, Technology Integration, and Educational Standards Cover

Examining the Self-Efficacy of Pre-service Science Teachers Concerning Digital Material Development, Technology Integration, and Educational Standards

Open Access
|Aug 2024

References

  1. Akbaş, Y., & Toros, S. (2016). The effect of using interactive concept cartoons and concept maps on academic achievement in social studies teaching. Electronic Turkish Studies, 11(9), 5368. 10.7827/TurkishStudies.9727
  2. Albion, P. R. (1999). Self-efficacy beliefs as an indicator of teachers’ preparedness for teaching with technology. In J. Price et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 1999 (pp. 16021608). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  3. Algeo, C., Konstantinou, E., Nachbagauer, A., & Wehnes, H. (2021). Call for papers for the Special paper collection: Digital learning and education in a project society. Project Leadership and Society, 2, 100007. 10.1016/j.plas.2021.100007
  4. Altinpulluk, H., Kilinc, H., Alptekin, G., Yildirim, Y., & Yumurtaci, O. (2023). Self-directed learning and intrinsic motivation levels in MOOCs. Open Praxis, 15(2), 149161. 10.55982/openpraxis.15.2.556
  5. Anderson, R. E., & Dexter, S. (2005). School technology leadership: An empirical investigation of prevalence and effect. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 4982. 10.1177/0013161X04269517
  6. Aslan, B., & Inceoğlu, M. M. (2023). The relationship between students’ online learning readiness and satisfaction in emergency distance education. Journal of Open Education Practices and Research, 9(1), 238272. 10.51948/auad.1204435
  7. Azar, A. (2010). In-service and pre-service secondary science teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs about science teaching. Educational Research and Reviews, 5(4), 175188.
  8. Banitt, J. S., Theis, L. C., & Leeuwe, L. (2013). The effects of technology integration on student engagement. Sophia, the St. Catherine University. https://sophia.stkate.edu/maed/7
  9. Bauer Martin, W. (2003). Classical content analysis: A review. In Qualitative researching with text, image and sound. M. W. Bauer & G. Gaskell (Eds.), (pp. 131). Sage.
  10. Beard, J. L. (2016). Self-directed learning: A potential predictor of technology integration confidence among preservice teachers [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Tennessee.
  11. Bervell, B., & Umar, I. N. (2017). A decade of LMS acceptance and adoption research in Sub-Sahara African higher education: A systematic review of models, methodologies, milestones, and main challenges. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(11), 72697286. 10.12973/ejmste/79444
  12. Blaine, A. M. (2019). Interaction and presence in the virtual classroom: An analysis of the perceptions of students and teacher in online and blended advanced placement courses. Computers & Education, 132, 3143. 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.004
  13. Boluda, J. C., Peiro, M. A., Torres, M. L., Girones, R., & Palero, R. C. (2006). An active methodology for teaching electronic systems design. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49(3), 355359. 10.1109/TE.2006.879247
  14. Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to Corona Virus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), ivi. 10.5281/zenodo.3778083
  15. Bull, P. (2009). ISTE NETS.T Standards: Perceptions of In-service and Preservice Teachers to Technology in Education. In I. Gibson, R. Weber, K. McFerrin, R. Carlsen & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2009—Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 17601767). Charleston, SC, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  16. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Data analysis handbook for social sciences (7th Edition). PegemA Publishing.
  17. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2015). Scientific research methods (19th Edition). Pegem A.
  18. Cadenas, J. O. (2015). Virtualization for cost-effective teaching of assembly language programming. IEEE Transactions on Education, 58(4), 282288. 10.1109/TE.2015.2405895
  19. Çakmak, Ö. (2008). The Influence of education on economy and development, Journal of Ziya Gökalp Faculty of Education, 11, 3341.
  20. Çepni, S. (2007). Introduction to research and project work. Celepler Printing.
  21. Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1994). The interview. In L. Cohen & L. Manion (Eds.), Research Methods in Education (Fourth Edition). Routledge.
  22. Çoklar, A. N. (2008). Assessing The Self-Efficacy of Teacher Candidates Concerning The Educational Technology Standards [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Anadolu.
  23. Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., Magni, P., & Lam, S. (2020). COVID-19: 20 Countries’ Higher Education Intra-Period Digital Pedagogy Responses. Journal of Applied Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 928. 10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7
  24. Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209240). Sage.
  25. Dabbagh, N. (2007). The online learner: Characteristics and pedagogical implications. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(3), 217226.
  26. Daniel, J. (2020). Education and the COVID-19 Pandemic. Prospects, 49(1), 9196. 10.1007/s11125-020-09464-3
  27. Dele-Ajayi, O. (2018). How can digital educational games be used to improve engagement with mathematics in the classroom? [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Northumbria.
  28. De Oliveira, É. T. (2021). Assessment, interaction and technology in distance education: Anetnographic study at a Brazilian virtual university. Open Praxis, 13(3), 242252. 10.5944/openpraxis.13.3.133
  29. Dönmez-Usta, N. (2021). Using Technology in the Learning Environment within the Framework of Learning Theories, Approaches or Models, In N. Dönmez-Usta, E. Turan-Güntepe & Ü. G. Durukan (Eds.), Dijital Interactive Teaching Materials in (pp. 195201). Nobel Academy.
  30. Drew, C. J., Hardman, M. L., & Hart, A. W. (1996). Designing and conducting research: Inquiry in education and social science. Allyn & Bacon.
  31. Erbenzer, E., & Aslan, M. (2024). Primary school teachers’ self-efficacy perceptions of digital instructional materials development: A mixed-method study. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 25(1), 1849. 10.17679/inuefd.1173257
  32. Eurydice, R. (2019). Digital education at school in Europe, publications office of the European Union Retrieved February 20, 2023 from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d7834ad0-ddac-11e9-9c4e-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-105790537
  33. Gavora, P. (2010). Slovak pre-service teacher self-efficacy: Theoretical and research. The New Educational Review, 21(2), 1730.
  34. Günaydın, S., & Kurt, A. A. (2021). Use of digital interactive materials in the learning environment. N. Dönmez-Usta, E. Turan-Güntepe & Ü. G. Durukan (Eds.), Dijital Interactive Teaching Materials in (pp. 314). Nobel Academy.
  35. Hamada, M., & Hassan, M. (2017). An interactive learning environment for information and communication theory. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(1), 3559. 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00603a
  36. Hamada, M., & Sato, S. (2012). A Learning System for a Computational Science Related Topic. Procedia Computer Science, 9(2012), 17631772. 10.1016/j.procs.2012.04.194
  37. Hancock, R. D., & Algozzine, B. (2006). Doing case study research. Teachers College Press.
  38. International Society for Technology in Education. (2019). ISTE standard frequently asked questions. Retrieved April 4, 2023 from https://www.iste.org/standards/standards/iste-standards-2016-faq
  39. Kavrat, B., & Türel, Y. K. (2013). Development of a scale for teachers’ roles and competencies in online distance learning, The Journal of Instructional Technologies & Teacher Education, 1(3), 2333.
  40. Kayaduman, H. (2022). Integrating design-based learning and mentoring strategies into a professional development program for distance education instructors. Open Praxis, 14(1), 5467. 10.55982/openpraxis.14.1.139
  41. Kayaduman, H., & Demirel, T. (2019). Investigating the concerns of first-time distance education instructors. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(5), 85103. 10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4467
  42. Korkmaz, Ö., Arıkaya, C., & Altıntaş, Y. (2019). Developing the self-efficacy scale of teachers’ digital teaching material development. Turkish Journal of Primary Education, 4(2), 4056.
  43. Liliana, R. A., Raharjo, W., Jauhari, I., & Sulisworo, D. (2020). Effects of the online interactive learning media on student’s achievement and interest in physics. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 5968. 10.13189/ujer.2020.081507
  44. Liu, S. H. (2012). A multivariate model of factors influencing technology use by preservice teachers during practice teaching. Educational Technology & Society, 15, 137149.
  45. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
  46. Mohamed, H. (2008). An integrated virtual environment for active e-learning in theory of computation. Learning Technologies, 1(2), 114. 10.1109/TLT.2008.3
  47. Mtebe, J. S. (2020). Examining eLearning system self-efficacy amongst instructors at the University of Dodoma, Tanzania. Open Praxis, 12(3), 343357. 10.5944/openpraxis.12.3.1103
  48. Muzammil, M., Sutawijaya, A., & Harsasi, M. (2020). Investigating student satisfaction in online learning: the role of student interaction and engagement in distance learning university. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21, 8896. 10.17718/tojde.770928
  49. Nurbaiti, N., Panjaitan, R. G. P., & Titin, T. (2017). The properness of adobe flash basis interactive media for respiratory system learning material. Unnes Science Education Journal, 6(3). 16621668. 10.15294/USEJ.V6I3.20350
  50. Perkmen, S. (2008). Factors that influence pre-service teachers’ technology integration performance. [Unpublished doctoral thesis], University of Iowa.
  51. Petrova, K. (2007). Mobile learning as a mobile business application. International Journal of Innovation in Learning, 4(1), 113. 10.1504/IJIL.2007.011471
  52. Podschuweit, S., Bernholt, S., & Brückmann, M. (2016). Classroom learning and achievement: how the complexity of classroom interaction impacts students’ learning. Research in Science & Technological Education, 34(2), 142163. 10.1080/02635143.2015.1092955
  53. Roblyer, M. D. (2006). Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching (5th Edition). Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
  54. Sharp, L. A. (2014). Literacy in the Digital Age. Language and Literacy Spectrum, 24, 7485.
  55. Simsek, O., & Yazar, T. (2016). Education technology standards self-efficacy scale: A validity and reliability study. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 63, 311334. 10.14689/ejer.2016.63.18
  56. Tanahoung, C., Chitaree, R., Soankwan, C., Sharma, M. D., & Johnston, I. D. (2009). The effect of Interactive Lecture Demonstrations on students’ understanding of heat and temperature: a study from Thailand. Research in Science & Technological Education, 27(1), 6174. 10.1080/02635140802658909
  57. Taşkıran, A. (2021). Management, learning, technology and assessment dimensions of open and distance learning processes. Journal of Open Education Practices and Research, 7(4), 8098. 10.51948/auad.984969
  58. Telli, E., & Altun, A. (2023). Effect of semantic encoding strategy instruction on transfer of learning in e-learning environments. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 6(1), 115. 10.31681/jetol.1205276
  59. Telli Yamamoto, G., & Altun, D. (2020). The coronavirus and the rising of online education. Journal of University Research, 3(1), 2534. 10.32329/uad.711110
  60. Turan-Güntepe, E., Durmuş, T., & Dönmez-Usta, N. (2023). Assessment of Distance Learning Practices During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Grades K-12. Athens Journal of Education, 10(2), 249270. 10.30958/aje.10-2-4
  61. Ünal, E., & Teker, N. (2018). The adaption of technology integration self-efficacy scale in Turkish. Journal of Social Sciences of Mus Alparslan University, 6(6), 973978. 10.18506/anemon.400497
  62. UNESCO. (2020). 290 million students out of school due to Covid-19: Unesco releases first global numbers and mobilizes response. UNESCO. Retrieved from March 4, 2020: https://en.unesco.org/news/290-million-students-out-school-due-covid-19-unesco-releases-first-global-numbers-and-mobilizes
  63. URL-1 https://www.yok.gov.tr/Sayfalar/Haberler/2023/yok-baskani-ozvar-in-2022-2023-akademik-yili-bahar-donemine-iliskin-aciklamasi.aspx
  64. URL-2 Development and Design of Interactive Teaching Materials Suitable for the New World Order I-II. www.etkilesimlimateryal.giresun.edu.tr
  65. Van Acker, F., Van Buuren, H., Kreijns, K., & Marjan, V. (2013). Why teachers use digital learning materials: The role of self-efficacy, subjective norm and attitude. Education and Information Technologies, 18, 495514. 10.1007/s10639-011-9181-9
  66. Wang, Q., & Woo, H. L. (2007). Systematic planning for ICT integration in topic learning. Educational Technology and Society, 10(1), 148156.
  67. Wellington, J. (2000). Educational research contemporary issues and practical approaches. Continuum.
  68. Westelinck, K. D., Valcke, M., Craene, B. D., & Kirschner, P. (2005). Multimedia learning in social sciences: Limitations of external graphical representations. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(4), 555573. 10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.030
  69. Woodcock, S., Sisco, A., & Eady, M. (2015). The learning experience: Training teachers using online synchronous environments. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 5(1), 2134. 10.5590/JERAP.2015.05.1.02
  70. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
Language: English
Page range: 410 - 428
Submitted on: Mar 4, 2024
Accepted on: Jul 19, 2024
Published on: Aug 29, 2024
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Necla Dönmez Usta, Ebru Turan Güntepe, Ümmü Gülsüm Durukan, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.