The Relationship between Satisfaction, Interaction, E-learning Readiness, and Academic Achievement in Online Learning
References
- Abuhassna, H., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahya, N., Zakaria, M. A. Z. M., Kosnin, A. B. M., & Darwish, M. (2020). Development of a new model on utilizing online learning platforms to improve students’ academic achievements and satisfaction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 1–23. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-020-00216-z
- Acar-Güvendir, M., & Özer-Özkan, Y. (2021). Distance education’s impact on assessment: Online exams or classroom exams?. Journal of Digital Measurement and Evaluation Research, 1(1), 22–34. DOI: 10.29329/dmer.2021.285.2
- Akıncı, M., & Tunç, M. P. (2021). The problems encountered by pre-service mathematics teachers in distance education practices and solution suggestions. Ekev Academic Journal, 85, 359–376. DOI: 10.1207/S15389286AJDE1602_3
- Al Rawashdeh, A. Z., Mohammed, E. Y., Al Arab, A. R., Alara, M., & Al-Rawashdeh, B. (2021). Advantages and disadvantages of using e-learning in university education: Analyzing students’ perspectives. Electronic Journal of E-learning, 19(3), 107–117. DOI: 10.34190/ejel.19.3.2168
- Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2014). Grade change: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED602449.pdf - Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Burrell, N., & Mabry, E. (2002). Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: A meta-analysis. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 83–97. DOI: 10.1207/S15389286AJDE1602_3
- Alzahrani, M. (2022). Traditional learning compared to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons learned from faculty’s perspectives. SAGE Open, 12(2), 1–11. DOI: 10.1177/21582440221091720
- Ayanbode, O. F., Fagbe, A., Owolabi, R., Oladipo, S., & Ewulo, O. R. (2022). Students’ interactions, satisfaction and perceived progress in an online class: Empirical evidence from Babcock university Nigeria. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2060783. DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2022.2060783
- Bağrıacık, A. (2015).
The relationship between perceptions of interaction and satisfaction levels of students in online learning environments . Master’s thesis, Gazi University, Department of Computer Education and Instructional Technology, Ankara, Türkiye. - Bağrıacık Yılmaz, A., & Karataş, S. (2018). Development and validation of perceptions of online interaction scale. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(3), 337–354. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2017.1333009
- Bağrıacık Yılmaz, A., & Karataş, S. (2022). Why do open and distance education students drop out? Views from various stakeholders. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1–22. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-022-00333-x
- Barrot, J. S., Llenares, I. I., & del Rosario, L. S. (2021). Students’ online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope with them: The case of the Philippines. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7321–7338. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-021-10589-x
- Bayır, Ö. Ö., Dulay, S., & Tekel, E. (2022). Being a Teacher without Entering Classrooms: Pre-Service Teachers’ Experiences in Online Teaching Practicum. Anatolian Journal of Education, 7(2), 31–48. DOI: 10.29333/aje.2022.724a
- Byrne, B. M. (1998).
Structural equation modeling with Lisrel , Prelis and Simplis: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. - Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
- Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
- Çabı, E. (2016). The perception of students on e-assessment in distance education. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 6(1), 094–101.
https://www.academia.edu/75749259/The_perception_of_students_on_e_assessment_in_distance_education . DOI: 10.5961/jhes.2016.146 - Çebi, A. (2023). How e-learning readiness and motivation affect student interactions in distance learning?. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 2941–2960. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-022-11312-0
- Demir-Kaymak, Z., & Horzum, M. B. (2013). Relationship between online learning readiness and structure and interaction of online learning students. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(3), 1792–1797. DOI: 10.12738/estp.2013.3.1580
- Dikbaş Torun, E. D. (2020). Online distance learning in higher education: E-learning readiness as a predictor of academic achievement. Open Praxis, 12(2), 191–208. DOI: 10.5944/openpraxis.12.2.1092
- Doll, W. J., Deng, X., Raghunathan, T. S., Torkzadeh, G., & Xia, W. (2004). The meaning and measurement of user satisfaction: A multigroup invariance analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(1), 227–262.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/40398790 . DOI: 10.1080/07421222.2004.11045789 - Dursun, Y., & Kocagöz, E. (2010). Structural equation modeling and regression: A comparative analysis. Erciyes University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 35, 1–17.
https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/66557 - Einfeld, D. H. (2014). Learner-content, learner-instructor, and learner-learner interaction in a web-enhanced, internet videoconference Ap Calculus Course. Doctoral Thesis, The University of West Florida, The Department of Instructional and Performance Technology, Pensacola, U.S.A.
- Erdoğan, B. (2013).
The effect of adaptive learning management system on student’s satisfaction, motivation and achievement in online learning . Doctoral thesis, Ankara University, Department of Computer Education and Instructional Technology, Ankara, Türkiye. - Eryılmaz, M. (2011). The impact of hypermedia on satisfaction and cognitive load of students by using adaptive presentation and adaptive navigation. Journal of Educational Sciences & Practices, 10(20), 181–195.
http://www.ebuline.com/pdfs/20Sayi/EBU20_4.pdf - Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. DOI: 10.1177/002224378101800104
- Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
- Fulford, C. P., & Zhang, S. (1993). Perceptions of interaction: The critical predictor in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 7(3), 8–21. DOI: 10.1080/08923649309526830
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
- Hawkins, A., Barbour, M. K., & Graham, C. R. (2011). Strictly business: Teacher perceptions of interaction in virtual schooling. Journal of Distance Education, 25(2), 211.
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1812&context=facpub - Hillier, M. (2014). The very idea of e-Exams: student (pre) conceptions. In Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Conference. Sydney, Australia.
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/43365108.pdf - Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., Loughin, T. M., Kovanović, V., & Hatala, M. (2015). Learning at distance: Effects of interaction traces on academic achievement. Computers & Education, 87, 204–217. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.002
- Kalelioğlu, F., & Baturay, M. H. (2014). Adaptation of e-learning readiness self-assessment instrument to Turkish: The validity and reliability study. Başkent University Journal of Education, 1(2), 22–30.
http://buje.baskent.edu.tr/index.php/buje/article/view/34 - Kayaduman, H., Battal, A., & Polat, H. (2022). The relationship between undergraduate students’ digital literacy and self-regulation in online interaction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–12. DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2022.2113113
- Khatib Zanjani, N., Ajam, A. A., & Badnava, S. (2017). Determining the relationship between self-directed learning readiness and acceptance of e-learning and academic achievement of students. Iran Journal of Nursing, 30(106), 11–22. DOI: 10.29252/ijn.30.106.11
- Kim, H. J., Hong, A. J., & Song, H. D. (2019). The roles of academic engagement and digital readiness in students’ achievements in university e-learning environments. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–18. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-019-0152-3
- Kirmizi, Ö. (2015). The influence of learner readiness on student satisfaction and academic achievement in an online program at higher education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 14(1), 133–142.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1057353.pdf - Kornpitack, P., & Sawmong, S. (2022). Analysis of factors affecting satisfaction in using different online systems for successful learning in the next normal era of high school students in Thailand. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 28(2), 1–14.
https://www.proquest.com/openview/a92566fc3e7924029122dbed9531262e/1?cbl=29726&pq-origsite=gscholar - Kukul, V. (2011).
Student and faculty satisfaction in information technologies-based distance education . Master’s Thesis, Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara. - Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 16–39. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1338
- Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The internet and higher education, 20, 35–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001
- Lasfeto, D. B., & Ulfa, S. (2020). The relationship between self-directed learning and students’ social interaction in the online learning environment. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 16(2), 34–41. DOI: 10.20368/1971-8829/1135078
- Lee, H. J., & Rha, I. (2009). Influence of structure and interaction on student achievement and satisfaction in web-based distance learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 372–382.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.12.4.372 - Moore, M. G. (1993).
Theory of Transactional Distance . In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical Principles of Distance Education (pp. 22–29). Routledge. - Miles, J., & Shevlin, M. (2007). A time and a place for incremental fit indices. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 869–874. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.022
- Quayyum, A., Zipf, S., Gungor, R., & Dillon, J. M. (2019). Financial aid and learner persistence in online education in the United States. Distance Education, 40(1), 20–31. DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2018.1553561
- Parlak, Ö. (2004).
İnternet temelli uzaktan eğitimde öğrenci doyum ölçeği [Student satisfaction scale in internet-based distance education] . Mater’s Thesis, Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara. - Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (M. Bütün & S. B. Demir, Trans.). Pegem.
- Parahoo, S. K., Santally, M. I., Rajabalee, Y., & Harvey, H. L. (2016). Designing a predictive model of student satisfaction in online learning. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 26(1), 1–19. DOI: 10.1080/08841241.2015.1083511
- Rajabalee, Y. B., & Santally, M. I. (2021). Learner satisfaction, engagement and performances in an online module: Implications for institutional e-learning policy. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 2623–2656. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-020-10375-1
- Rasouli, A., Rahbania, Z., & Attaran, M. (2016). Students’ readiness for e-learning application in higher education. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(3), 51–64.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1106478.pdf - Radovan, M. (2019). Should I stay, or Should I go? Revisiting Student retention models in distance education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(3), 29–40. DOI: 10.17718/tojde.598211
- Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). A first course in structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Sher, A. (2009). Assessing the relationship of student-instructor and student-student interaction to student learning and satisfaction in web-based online learning environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2).
https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=7810cfba73c549ffc94437375b9e6e8f84336af5 - Uttley, J. (2019). Power analysis, sample size, and assessment of statistical assumptions—Improving the evidential value of lighting research. Leukos, 15(2–3), 143–162. DOI: 10.1080/15502724.2018.1533851
- Wagner, E. D. (1994). In support of a functional definition of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 6–29. DOI: 10.1080/08923649409526852
- Wei, H. C., & Chou, C. (2020). Online learning performance and satisfaction: do perceptions and readiness matter?. Distance Education, 41(1), 48–69. DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2020.1724768
- West, S. G., Taylor, A. B., & Wu, W. (2012).
Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling . In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209–231). The Guilford Press. - Yang, C., & Xu, D. (2023). Predicting student and instructor e-readiness and promoting e-learning success in online EFL class during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case from China. Plos one, 18(5),
e0284334 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284334 - Yıldırım, D., & Usluel, Y. (2022). Interrelated analysis of interaction, sequential patterns and academic achievement in online learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 181–200. DOI: 10.14742/ajet.7360
- Yılmaz, A. (2020).
Why do open and distance education students dropout or persist? Doctoral thesis, Gazi University, Department of Computer Education and Instructional Technology, Ankara, Türkiye. - Yılmaz, R. (2017). Exploring the role of e-learning readiness on student satisfaction and motivation in flipped classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 251–260. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.085
- Yılmaz, R., & Keser, H. (2015). The adaptation study of transactional distance scale. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 30(4), 91–105.
http://efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/shw_artcl-1775.html - Yükseltürk, E. (2009).
Do entry characteristics of online learners affect their satisfaction? . International Journal on E-Learning, 8(2), 263–281. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/25266/ . - Yükselturk, E., & Bulut, S. (2007). Predictors for student success in an online course. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 71–83.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.10.2.71 - Yurdugül, H., & Demir, Ö. (2017). An investigation of pre-service teachers’ readiness for e-learning at undergraduate level teacher training programs: The case of Hacettepe University. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 32(4), 896–915. DOI: 10.16986/HUJE.2016022763
- Zalat, M. M., Hamed, M. S., & Bolbol, S. A. (2021). The experiences, challenges, and acceptance of e-learning as a tool for teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic among university medical staff. PLOS ONE, 16(3). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248758
- Zawacki-Richter, O., & Bozkurt, A. (2022).
Research Trends in Open, Distance, and Digital Education . In: Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_12-1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.15.3.578 | Journal eISSN: 2304-070X
Language: English
Page range: 199 - 213
Submitted on: Jul 22, 2023
Accepted on: Aug 15, 2023
Published on: Sep 5, 2023
Published by: International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2023 Ayşe Bağrıacık Yılmaz, published by International Council for Open and Distance Education (ICDE)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.