References
- 1Bada, SO and Olusegun, S. 2015. Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6): 66–70.
- 2Bessaha, M, Reed, R, Donlon, AJ, Mathews, W, Bell, AC and Merolla, D. 2020. Creating a more inclusive environment for students with disabilities: Findings from participatory action research. Disability Studies Quarterly, 40(3). DOI: 10.18061/dsq.v40i3.7094
- 3Bong, WK and Chen, W. 2021. Increasing faculty’s competence in digital accessibility for inclusive education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Inclusive Education. DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2021.1937344
- 4Boticario, JG, Rodriguez-Ascaso, A, Santos, OC, Raffenne, E, Montandon, L, Roldán Martínez, D and Buendía García, F. 2012. Accessible lifelong learning at higher education: Outcomes and lessons learned at two different pilotsites in the eu4all project. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 18(1): 62–85. DOI: 10.3217/jucs-018-01-0062
- 5Bouck, EC, Shurr, JC, Tom, K, Jasper, AD, Bassette, L, Miller, B and Flanagan, SM. 2012. Fix it with TAPE: Repurposing technology to be assistive technology for students with high-incidence disabilities. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 56(2): 121–128. DOI: 10.1080/1045988X.2011.603396
- 6Braun, V and Clarke, V. 2019. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4): 589–597. DOI: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
- 7Bremer, CD, Kachgal, M and Schoeller, M. 2003. Self-Determination: Supporting successful transition. Research to Practice Brief, 2(1).
- 8Coughlan, T and Lister, K. 2018. The accessibility of administrative processes: Assessing the impacts on students in higher education. In Proceedings of the 15th International Web for All Conference. ACM Press. DOI: 10.1145/3192714.3192820
- 9Coughlan, T, Ullmann, TD and Lister, K. 2017. Understanding accessibility as a process through the analysis of feedback from disabled students. In Proceedings of the 14th International Web for All Conference (pp. 1–10). DOI: 10.1145/3058555.3058561
- 10Dirth, TP and Branscombe, NR. 2017. Disability models affect disability policy support through awareness of structural discrimination. Journal of Social Issues, 73(2): 413–442. DOI: 10.1111/josi.12224
- 11Disabled Students UK. 2022. Going back is not a choice – Accessibility lessons for Higher Education. Available from:
https://disabledstudents.co.uk/not-a-choice/ . - 12Draffan, EA and Heumader, P. 2020. Artificial Intelligence, accessible and assistive technologies: Introduction to the special thematic session. In Computers Helping People with Special Needs: 17th International Conference, ICCHP 2020.
Springer International Publishing . 53–58. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58796-3_7 - 13Elias, M, Tavakoli, M, Lohmann, S, Kismihok, G and Auer, S. 2020. An OER recommender system supporting accessibility requirements. In Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility.
ACM Press . DOI: 10.1145/3373625.3418021 - 14Erdem, R. 2017. Students with special educational needs and assistive technologies: A literature review. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 16(1): 128–146.
- 15Fichten, CS, Asuncion, JV, Nguyen, MN, Wolforth, J, Budd, J, Barile, M, Gaulin, C, Martinello, N, Tibbs, A, Ferraro, V and Amsel, R. 2009. Development and validation of the POSITIVES scale (postsecondary information technology scale). Final project report. Available at:
https://eduq.info/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11515/32581/787331_fichten_et_al_positives_scale_dawson_CCL_2009.pdf . - 16Finkelstein, V. 1993.
The commonality of disability . In Swain, J, Finkelstein, V, French, S and Oliver, M (eds.), Disabling barriers, enabling environments. Open University Press; Sage Publications, Inc. pp. 9–16. - 17Gierach, J. (ed.) 2009. Assessing students’ needs for assistive technology (ASNAT). Madison, WI: Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative (WATI) and the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (DPI).
- 18Heumader, P, Murillo-Morales, T and Miesenberger, K. 2022. AI based recommendation and assessment of AT for people with cognitive disabilities. The Journal on Technology and Persons with Disabilities, 10.
- 19Iniesto, F, Coughlan, T, Lister, K, Devine, P, Freear, ND, Greenwood, R, Holmes, W, Kenny, I, McLeod, K and Tudor, R. 2023.
Creating ‘a simple conversation’: Designing a conversational user interface to improve the experience of accessing support for study . ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 16(1). Article No. 6. ACM Press. DOI: 10.1145/3568166 - 20Iniesto, F and Rodrigo, C. 2016. A preliminary study for developing accessible MOOC services. Journal of Accessibility and Design For All, 6(2): 126–150.
- 21Iniesto, F, Rodrigo, C and Hillaire, G. 2023. A case study to explore a UDL evaluation framework based on MOOCs. Applied Sciences, 13(1): 476. DOI: 10.3390/app13010476
- 22Kung, TH, Cheatham, M, Medenilla, A, Sillos, C, De Leon, L, Elepaño, C, Madriaga, M, Aggabao, R, Diaz-Candido, G, Maningo, J and Tseng, V. 2023. Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLOS Digital Health, 2(2):
e0000198 . DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198 - 23Lasecki, WS, Thiha, P, Zhong, Y, Brady, E and Bigham, JP. 2013. Answering visual questions with conversational crowd assistants. In Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility.
ACM Press . DOI: 10.1145/2513383.2517033 - 24Lee, S, Yu, R, Xie, J, Billah, SM and Carroll, JM. 2022, March. Opportunities for human-AI collaboration in remote sighted assistance. In 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 63–78). DOI: 10.1145/3490099.3511113
- 25Leonardi, M, Bickenbach, J, Ustun, TB, Kostanjsek, N and Chatterji, S. 2006. The definition of disability: What is in a name? The Lancet, 368(9543): 1219–1221. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69498-1
- 26Lister, K, Coughlan, T and Owen, N. 2020. ‘Disability’ or ‘Additional study needs’? Identifying students’ language preferences in disability-related communications. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 35(5): 620–635. DOI: 10.1080/08856257.2020.1743409
- 27Lister, K, Pearson, VK, Coughlan, T and Tessarolo, F. 2022. Inclusion in uncertain times: Changes in practices, perceptions, and attitudes around accessibility and inclusive practice in Higher Education. Education Sciences, 12(8): 571. DOI: 10.3390/educsci12080571
- 28Liu, Z, Glassey Balet, N, Sokhn, M and De Gaspari, E. 2017. Crowdsourcing-based mobile application for wheelchair accessibility. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual International Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference Scientific/Research.
- 29McAndrew, P, Farrow, R and Cooper, M. 2012. Adapting online learning resources for all: Planning for professionalism in accessibility. Research in Learning Technology, 20(4): 345–361. DOI: 10.3402/rlt.v20i0.18699
- 30McNicholl, A, Casey, H, Desmond, D and Gallagher, P. 2021. The impact of assistive technology use for students with disabilities in higher education: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 16(2): 130–143. DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1642395
- 31Murphy, R. 2021. Higher education students with disabilities’ perceptions of emergency remote learning–exploring the benefits and barriers of e-learning. The AHEAD Journal, 12.
- 32Norrie, CS, Waller, A and Hannah, EF. 2021. Establishing context: AAC device adoption and support in a special-education setting. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 28(2): 1–30. DOI: 10.1145/3446205
- 33Nulty, DD. 2008. The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3): 301–314. DOI: 10.1080/02602930701293231
- 34Oliver, M. 2013. The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability & Society, 28(7): 1024–1026. DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2013.818773
- 35Open University. 2020. Access and participation plan. Available from:
https://www.open.ac.uk/about/wideningparticipation/sites/www.open.ac.uk.about.wideningparticipation/files/files/OU%20Access%20and%20Participation%20Plan%202020-2025.pdf . - 36Policy Connect & Higher Education Commission. 2020. Arriving at thriving: Learning from disabled students to ensure access for all. Available at:
https://www.policyconnect.org.uk/research/arriving-thriving-learning-disabled-students-ensure-access-all . - 37Richardson, JTE. 2010. Course completion and attainment in disabled students taking courses with The Open University UK. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 25(2): 81–94. DOI: 10.1080/02680511003787263
- 38Richardson, JTE. 2015a. Academic attainment in deaf and hard-of-hearing students in distance education. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 30(2): 164–177. DOI: 10.1080/02680513.2015.1071245
- 39Richardson, JTE. 2015b. Academic attainment in students with dyslexia in distance education. Dyslexia, 21(4): 323–337. DOI: 10.1002/dys.1502
- 40Richardson, JTE. 2015c. Academic attainment in students with mental health difficulties in distance education. International Journal of Mental Health, 44(3): 231–240. DOI: 10.1080/00207411.2015.1035084
- 41Sapsford, R and Jupp, V. 2006. Data collection and analysis. Sage Publications Ltd. DOI: 10.4135/9781849208802
- 42Scherer, MJ and Craddock, G. 2002. Matching Person & Technology (MPT) assessment process. Technology & Disability, Special Issue: The Assessment of Assistive Technology Outcomes, Effects and Costs, 14(3): 125-131. DOI: 10.3233/TAD-2002-14308
- 43Seale, J, Colwell, C, Coughlan, T, Heiman, T, Kaspi-Tsahor, D and Olenik-Shemesh, D. 2021. ‘Dreaming in colour’: Disabled higher education students’ perspectives on improving design practices that would enable them to benefit from their use of technologies. Education and Information Technologies, 26: 1687–1719. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-020-10329-7
- 44Seale, J, Draffan, EA and Wald, M. 2008. Exploring disabled learners’ experiences of e-learning. LEXDIS Project Report.
- 45Seale, J, Georgeson, J, Mamas, C and Swain, J. 2015. Not the right kind of ‘digital capital’? An examination of the complex relationship between disabled students, their technologies and higher education institutions. Computers & Education, 82: 118–128. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.007
- 46Slaughter, R and Waller, A. 2022. MSc Educational Assistive Technology: Training a new professional group. Proceedings of Communication Matters International AAC Conference 2022. Available from:
https://discovery.dundee.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/84691618/CM2022BookofAbstracts.pdf . DOI: 10.3233/SHTI230661 - 47Thomas, D and Woods, H. 2003. Working with people with learning disabilities: Theory and practice. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
- 48UNESCO. 2018. Education and disability: Analysis of data from 49 countries. Available from:
http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/ip49-education-disability-2018-en.pdf . - 49W3C. 2021. Explainer for W3C Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 3.0. Available from:
https://www.w3.org/TR/wcag-3.0-explainer/ . - 50World Health Organisation. 2012. Measuring health and disability: Manual for WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0). Available from:
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/measuring-health-and-disability-manual-for-who-disability-assessment-schedule-(-whodas-2.0) . - 51World Health Organisation and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). 2022. Global report on assistive technology. Available from:
https://www.unicef.org/reports/global-report-assistive-technology . - 52Zawacki-Richter, O, Marín, VI, Bond, M and Gouverneur, F. 2019. Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1): 1–27. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0