Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Students’ Agency and Self-Regulated Skills through the Lenses of Assessment Co-creation in Post-COVID-19 Online and Blended Settings: A Multi-Case Study Cover

Students’ Agency and Self-Regulated Skills through the Lenses of Assessment Co-creation in Post-COVID-19 Online and Blended Settings: A Multi-Case Study

Journal of Interactive Media in Education
Volume 2022 (2022): Issue 1
By: Jennifer Saray Santana Martel and  Adolfina Perez Garcías  
Open Access
|Sep 2022

References

  1. 1Blau, I and Shamir-Inbal, T. 2018. Digital technologies for promoting “student voice” and co-creating learning experience in an academic course. Instructional Science, 46(2): 315–336. DOI: 10.1007/s11251-017-9436-y
    Back to article
  2. 2Bovill, C, Cook-Sather, A, Felten, P, Millard, L and Moore-Cherry, N. 2016. Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71(2): 195–208. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4
    Back to article
  3. 3Bovill, C and Woolmer, C. 2019. How conceptualisations of curriculum in higher education influence student-staff co-creation in and of the curriculum. Higher Education, 78(4). DOI: 10.1007/s10734-018-0349-8
    Back to article
  4. 4Colson, N, Shuker, M and Maddock, L. 2021. Switching on the creativity gene: A co-creation assessment initiative in a large first year genetics course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2021.2011133
    Back to article
  5. 5Deeley, SJ and Bovill, C. 2017. Staff student partnership in assessment: Enhancing assessment literacy through democratic practices. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3): 463–477. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1126551
    Back to article
  6. 6Dorta, T, Kinayoglu, G and Boudhraâ, S. 2016. A new representational ecosystem for design teaching in the studio. Design Studies, 47: 164–186. DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.003
    Back to article
  7. 7Doyle, E and Buckley, P. 2020. The impact of co-creation: An analysis of the effectiveness of student authored multiple choice questions on achievement of learning outcomes. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–10. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2020.1777166
    Back to article
  8. 8Doyle, E, Buckley, P and Whelan, J. 2019. Assessment co-creation: An exploratory analysis of opportunities and challenges based on student and instructor perspectives. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(6): 739–754. DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2018.1498077
    Back to article
  9. 9Frost, D. 2006. The concept of ‘agency’ in leadership for learning. Leading & Managing, 12(2): 19–28.
    Back to article
  10. 10Gros, B and López, M. 2016. Students as co-creators of technology-rich learning activities in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1). DOI: 10.1186/s41239-016-0026-x
    Back to article
  11. 11Haraldseid, C, Friberg, F and Aase, K. 2016. How can students contribute? A qualitative study of active student involvement in development of technological learning material for clinical skills training. BMC Nursing, 15(1): 1–10. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-016-0125-y
    Back to article
  12. 12Healey, M, Flint, A and Harrington, K. 2014. Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. HEA.
    Back to article
  13. 13Hussain, S, Gamage, KAA, Ahmad, W and Imran, MA. 2019. Assessment and feedback for large classes in transnational engineering education: Student-staff partnership-based innovative approach. Education Sciences, 9(3). DOI: 10.3390/educsci9030221
    Back to article
  14. 14Jääskelä, P, Poikkeus, AM, Vasalampi, K, Valleala, UM and Rasku-Puttonen, H. 2017. Assessing agency of university students: Validation of the AUS Scale. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11): 2061–2079. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1130693
    Back to article
  15. 15Kaminskiene, L, Žydžiunaite, V, Jurgile, V and Ponomarenko, T. 2020. Co-creation of learning: A concept analysis. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 9(2): 337–349. DOI: 10.13187/ejced.2020.2.337
    Back to article
  16. 16Marin, VI, de Benito Crosetti, B and Darder, A. 2020. Technology-enhanced learning for student agency in higher education: A systematic literature review. IxD&A, 45: 15–49. DOI: 10.55612/s-5002-045-001
    Back to article
  17. 17Martens, SE, Meeuwissen, SNE, Dolmans, DHJM, Bovill, C and Könings, KD. 2019. Student participation in the design of learning and teaching: Disentangling the terminology and approaches. Medical Teacher, 41(10): 1203–1205. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1615610
    Back to article
  18. 18Mercer-Mapstone, L, Dvorakova, SL, Matthews, KE, Abbot, S, Cheng, B, Felten, P, Knorr, K, Marquis, E, Shammas, R and Swaim, K. 2017. A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(1). DOI: 10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119
    Back to article
  19. 19Neubauer, BE, Witkop, CT and Varpio, L. 2019. How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(2): 90–97. DOI: 10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2
    Back to article
  20. 20Nicol, D. 2010. The foundation for graduate attributes: Developing self-regulation through self and peer assessment. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. http://www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/themes/21stCGraduates/outcomes.asp
    Back to article
  21. 21Quesada, V, Gómez Ruiz, MÁ, Gallego Noche, MB and Cubero-Ibáñez, J. 2019. Should I use co-assessment in higher education? Pros and cons from teachers and students’ perspectives. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(7): 987–1002. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1531970
    Back to article
  22. 22Salinas, J and De-Benito, B. 2020. Construction of personalized learning pathways through mixed methods. Comunicar, 28(65): 31–42. DOI: 10.3916/C65-2020-03
    Back to article
  23. 23Sanders, EB-N and Stappers, PJ. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1): 5–18. DOI: 10.1080/15710880701875068
    Back to article
  24. 24Santana-Martel, JS and Pérez-i-Garcias, A. 2020. El codiseño educativo haciendo uso de las TIC en educación superior: Una revisión sistemática de literatura. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa. Edutec., 74: 25–51. DOI: 10.21556/edutec.2020.74.1799
    Back to article
  25. 25Schunk, DH and Zimmerman, BJ. (eds.) 1998. Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
    Back to article
  26. 26Stake, R. 2006. Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
    Back to article
  27. 27Stefani, LAJ. 1998. Assessment in partnership with learners. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(4): 339–350. DOI: 10.1080/0260293980230402
    Back to article
  28. 28Thompson, J, Couzner, L and Houston, D. 2020. Assessment partnerships from the start: Building reflective practice as a beginning paramedic student competency. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, 17: 1–8. DOI: 10.33151/ajp.17.750
    Back to article
  29. 29Triantafyllakos, G, Palaigeorgiou, G and Tsoukalas, IA. 2011. Designing educational software with students through collaborative design games: The We!Design&Play framework. Computers and Education, 56(1): 227–242. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.002
    Back to article
  30. 30Villatoro Moral, S and de Benito, B. 2021. An approach to co-design and self-regulated learning in technological environments. Systematic review. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(2): 234–250. DOI: 10.7821/naer.2021.7.646
    Back to article
  31. 31Walters, SR, Silva, P and Nikolai, J. 2017. Teaching, learning, and assessment: Insights into students’ motivation to learn. Qualitative Report, 22(4): 1151–1168. DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2777
    Back to article
  32. 32Zimmerman, BJ. 1990. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1): 3–17. DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2
    Back to article
  33. 33Zimmerman, BJ. 2002. Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice. 41(2): 64–70. DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.746 | Journal eISSN: 1365-893X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Jan 31, 2022
Accepted on: May 6, 2022
Published on: Sep 12, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
assessment,
assessment co-creation,
students’ agency,
students’ self-regulation,
students’ participation,
higher education

© 2022 Jennifer Saray Santana Martel, Adolfina Perez Garcías, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 2022 (2022): Issue 1