Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Teacher Education in the Emergency: a MOOC-Inspired Teacher Professional Development Strategy Grounded in Critical Digital Pedagogy and Pedagogy of Care Cover

Teacher Education in the Emergency: a MOOC-Inspired Teacher Professional Development Strategy Grounded in Critical Digital Pedagogy and Pedagogy of Care

Journal of Interactive Media in Education
Volume 2021 (2021): Issue 1
By: Virginia Rodés,  Mariana Porta,  Lucia Garófalo and  Carolina Rodríguez Enríquez  
Open Access
|Sep 2021

References

  1. 1Adams, C and Rose, E. 2014. Will I ever connect with the students? Online teaching and the pedagogy of care. Phenomenology & Practice, 8(1): 5–16. DOI: 10.29173/pandpr20637
    Back to article
  2. 2Arocena, R and Sutz, J. 2017. La universidad Latinoamericana del futuro: Tendencias, escenarios, alternativas. UNICEN. Available at http://beu.extension.unicen.edu.ar/xmlui/handle/123456789/197.
    Back to article
  3. 3Aronowitz, S. 2000. Higher education as a public good. Routledge.
    Back to article
  4. 4Barnes, M, Brannelly, T, Ward, L and Ward, N. (eds.) 2015. Ethics of care. Bristol University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1t89d95
    Back to article
  5. 5Bates, T. 2016. 10 Fundamentals of teaching online for faculty and instructors. Canada: Contact North. Available at http://teachonline.ca/10fundamentals.
    Back to article
  6. 6Borko, H, Jacobs, J and Koellner, K. 2010. Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. International Encyclopedia of Education, 7(2): 548–556. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00654-0
    Back to article
  7. 7Borning, A, Friedman, B and Logler, N. 2020. The “invisible” materiality of information technology. Communications of the ACM, 63(6): 57–64. DOI: 10.1145/3360647
    Back to article
  8. 8Bozkurt, A, et al. 2020. A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 Pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1): 1–126. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3878572
    Back to article
  9. 9Brown, M, Costello, E and Giolla, M. 2020. The good, the bad and the ugly of teaching online. National Institute for Digital Learning, Dublin City University. Available at https://www.icde.org/icde-blog/2020/3/26/responding-to-covid-19.
    Back to article
  10. 10Brunner, JJ. 2007. Dr. Prometheus visits Latin America. In: Enders, J and van Vught, FA (eds.), Towards a cartography of higher education policy change. A Festschrift in Honour of Guy Neave. Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS). Available at: https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/towards-a-cartography-of-higher-education-policy-change-a-festsch (Last accessed 3 September 2018).
    Back to article
  11. 11Burke, K and Larmar, S. 2021. Acknowledging another face in the virtual crowd: Reimagining the online experience in higher education through an online pedagogy of care. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(5): 601–615. DOI: 10.1080/0309877X.2020.1804536
    Back to article
  12. 12Castañeda, L and Selwyn, N. 2018. More than tools? Making sense of the ongoing digitizations of higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1): 22. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-018-0109-y
    Back to article
  13. 13Czerwonogora, A and Rodés, V. 2019. PRAXIS: Open educational practices and open science to face the challenges of critical educational action research. Open Praxis, 11(4): 381. DOI: 10.5944/openpraxis.11.4.1024
    Back to article
  14. 14DGPlan, Dirección General de Planeamiento, Universidad de la República. 2019. Síntesis estadística de la universidad de la república. Montevideo, Uruguay.
    Back to article
  15. 15Didriksson, A. 2020. La educación superior en América Latina y el Caribe: El reto de la desigualdad frente a los ODS. Revista Educación Superior y Sociedad (ESS), 32(2): 279–304.
    Back to article
  16. 16Ellis, C, Adams, T and Bochner, A. 2011. Autoethnography: An overview. Historical Social Research, 36(4): 273–290.
    Back to article
  17. 17Gast, I, Schildkamp, K and van der Veen, JT. 2017. Team-based professional development interventions in higher education: A systematic review. Review of educational research, 87(4): 736–767. DOI: 10.3102/0034654317704306
    Back to article
  18. 18Giroux, HA. 2002. Neoliberalism, corporate culture, and the promise of higher education: The university as a democratic public sphere. Harvard Educational Review, 72(4): 425–463. DOI: 10.17763/haer.72.4.0515nr62324n71p1
    Back to article
  19. 19Giroux, HA. 2005. The terror of neoliberalism: Rethinking the significance of cultural politics. College Literature, 32(1): 1–19. DOI: 10.1353/lit.2005.0006
    Back to article
  20. 20Goodson, I. 2005. Learning, curriculum and life politics: The selected works of Ivor F. Goodson. London; New York: Routledge (World library of educationalists series).
    Back to article
  21. 21Graham, R. 2015. Does teaching advance your academic career? Perspectives of promotion procedures in UK higher education. London, England: Royal Academy of Engineering.
    Back to article
  22. 22Harland, T. 2009. The university, neoliberal reform and the liberal educational ideal. In: Tight, M, Mok, KH, Huisman, J and Morphew, C (eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Higher Education. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203882221-37
    Back to article
  23. 23Huang, YL, Xie, YR, Qiu, Y, Yuan, Q, Liu, YC and Thong, HW. 2020. Research on support services of MOOC-based online teacher professional development during the COVID19 pandemic. In: Ninth International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology. Porto. 52–57. DOI: 10.1109/EITT50754.2020.00015
    Back to article
  24. 24Jackson, P. 2002. Práctica de la enseñanza. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Amorrortu.
    Back to article
  25. 25Ji, Z and Cao, Y. 2016. A prospective study on the application of MOOC in teacher professional development in China. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(9): 2061–2067. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2016.040917
    Back to article
  26. 26Johnston, B, MacNeill, S and Smyth, K. 2018. Conceptualising the digital university. England: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-99160-3
    Back to article
  27. 27Kennedy, E and Laurillard, D. 2019. The potential of MOOCs for large-scale teacher professional development in contexts of mass displacement. London Review of Education, 17(2): 141–158. DOI: 10.18546/LRE.17.2.04
    Back to article
  28. 28Koukis, N and Jimoyiannis, A. 2019. MOOCS for teacher professional development: Exploring teachers’ perceptions and achievements. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 16(1): 74–91. DOI: 10.1108/ITSE-10-2018-0081
    Back to article
  29. 29Koukis, N and Jimoyiannis, A. 2020. Towards a design framework of MOOCs for teacher development. Themes in eLearning, 13: 69–86. Available at http://earthlab.uoi.gr/tel/index.php/themeselearn/article/view/27.
    Back to article
  30. 30Koutsodimou, K and Jimoyiannis, A. 2015. MOOCs for teacher professional development: Investigating views and perceptions of the participants. In: 8th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation. Seville, Spain.
    Back to article
  31. 31Lazarus, J. 2019. Hacking the MOOC: Towards a postdigital pedagogy of critical hope. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(2): 391–412. DOI: 10.1007/s42438-019-00063-w
    Back to article
  32. 32López Segrera, F. 2007. Educación superior internacional comparada (escenarios, temas y problemas). Global University Network for Innovation (GUNi).
    Back to article
  33. 33Marginson, S and Rhoades, G. 2002. Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic. Higher Education, 43(3): 281–309. DOI: 10.1023/A:1014699605875
    Back to article
  34. 34Martin, F, Budhrani, K, Kumar, S and Ritzhaupt, A. 2019. Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Roles and competencies. Online Learning, 23(1): 184–205. Available at https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1211042.pdf. DOI: 10.24059/olj.v23i1.1329
    Back to article
  35. 35Martínez Bonafé, J. 2008. Pero¿ Qué es la innovación educativa. Cuadernos de pedagogía, 375: 78–82.
    Back to article
  36. 36Medina, J and Sandín, M. 2006. La complejidad del cuidado y el cuidado de la complejidad: Un tránsito pedagógico de los reduccionismos fragmentantes a las lógicas no líneales de la complejidad. Texto & Contexto Enfermagem, 15(2): 312–319. ISSN: 0104-0707. Available at https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=71415216 (Last accessed 31 May 2021). DOI: 10.1590/S0104-07072006000200016
    Back to article
  37. 37Milligan, C, Littlejohn, A and Margaryan, A. 2013. Patterns of engagement in connectivist MOOCs. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2): 149–159. Available at: https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/186192/1/186192.pdf.
    Back to article
  38. 38Mishra, P and Koehler, MJ. 2006. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6): 1017–1054. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
    Back to article
  39. 39Morris, S and Stommel, J. 22 January 2013. A bill of rights and principles for learning in the digital age. Hybrid Pedagogy [online]. Available at https://hybridpedagogy.org/bill-rights-principles-learning-digital-age/.
    Back to article
  40. 40Morris, S and Stommel, J. 2017. Open education as resistance: MOOCs and critical digital pedagogy. In: Losh, E (ed.), MOOCs and their afterlives. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    Back to article
  41. 41Noddings, N. 2013. Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education. 2nd ed. Oakland, CA: University of California Press. Available at https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt7zw1nb. DOI: 10.1525/9780520957343
    Back to article
  42. 42Porta, M, Motz, R and de Queiroz Lopes, D. 2020. Teachers’ strategies for a multimodal teaching model in higher education. In: 2020 XV Conferencia Latinoamericana de Tecnologias de Aprendizaje (LACLO), 19–23 October 2020. 1–6. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/LACLO50806.2020.9381150
    Back to article
  43. 43ProEVA. 2020. Plan de contingencia. Programa de Entornos Virtuales de Aprendizaje, Comisión Sectorial de Enseñanza, Universidad de la República. Available at https://proeva.udelar.edu.uy/plan-de-contingencia-del-programa-de-entornos-virtuales-de-aprendizaje-de-la-udelar/.
    Back to article
  44. 44Queiroga, E, Cechinel, C and Araújo, R. 2017. Predição de estudantes com risco de evasão em cursos técnicos a distância. In: Anais do XXVIII Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação (SBIE 2017). 1547. DOI: 10.5753/cbie.sbie.2017.1547
    Back to article
  45. 45Queiroga, EM, Lopes, JL, Kappel, K, Aguiar, M, Araujo, RM and Munoz, R. 2020. A learning analytics approach to identify students at risk of dropout: A case study with a technical distance education course. Applied Sciences, 10(11). DOI: 10.3390/app10113998
    Back to article
  46. 46Rodés, V and García-Lutz, G. 2020. Emergency online learning at the Universidad De La República, Uruguay: Challenges for the post-pandemic digital university. In: Proceedings of the European Distance and E-Learning Network (EDEN) 2020 Research Workshop, Lisbon, 21–23 October 2020, 257–264. DOI: 10.38069/edenconf-2020-rw-0028
    Back to article
  47. 47Rolón-Dow, R. 2005. Critical care: A color(full) analysis of care narratives in the schooling experiences of Puerto Rican girls. American Educational Research Journal, 42(1): 77–111. DOI: 10.3102/00028312042001077
    Back to article
  48. 48Selwyn, N. 2014. Digital technology and the contemporary university: Degrees of digitization. London, New York: Routledge (Research into higher education). DOI: 10.4324/9781315768656
    Back to article
  49. 49Solbrekke, TD and Sugrue, C. 2020. Leading higher education as and for public good: Rekindling education as praxis. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780429261947
    Back to article
  50. 50Srnicek, N. 2017. The challenges of platform capitalism: Understanding the logic of a new business model. Juncture, 23(4): 254–257. DOI: 10.1111/newe.12023
    Back to article
  51. 51Stommel, J and Morris, SM. 2018. Critical digital pedagogy: A definition. In: Morris, SM and Stommel, J (eds.), An urgency of teachers. Pressbooks. Available at https://pb.openlcc.net/urgencyofteachers/chapter/chapter-1-2/ (Last accessed 7 June 2021).
    Back to article
  52. 52Trehan, S, Sanzgiri, J, Li, C, Wang, R and Joshi, RM. 2017. Critical discussions on the Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) in India and China. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 13(2): 141–165. Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1153318.pdf.
    Back to article
  53. 53Van de Poël, J and Verpoorten, D. 2019. Designing a MOOC: A new channel for teacher professional development? In: Calise, M, Kloos, CD, Reich, J, Ruiperez-Valiente, JA and Wirsing, M (eds.), Digital Education: At the MOOC crossroads where the interests of academia and business converge. Springer. 91–101. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-19875-6_11
    Back to article
  54. 54Vivian, R, Falkner, K and Falkner, N. 2014. Addressing the challenges of a new digital technologies curriculum. Research in Learning Technology, 22(1063519). DOI: 10.3402/rlt.v22.24691
    Back to article
  55. 55Wambugu, PW. 2018. Massive open online courses (MOOCs) for professional teacher and teacher educator development. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(6): 1153–1157. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2018.060604
    Back to article
  56. 56Williamson, B, Eynon, R and Potter, J. 2020. Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: Digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(2): 107–114. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2020.1761641
    Back to article
  57. 57Williamson, B, Macgilchrist, F and Potter, J. 2021. Covid-19 controversies and critical research in digital education. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(2): 117–127. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2021.1922437
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.657 | Journal eISSN: 1365-893X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 12, 2021
Accepted on: Jul 19, 2021
Published on: Sep 8, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Teacher Professional Development,
MOOC,
Emergency Remote Teaching,
Higher Education,
Critical Digital Pedagogy,
Pedagogy of Care

© 2021 Virginia Rodés, Mariana Porta, Lucia Garófalo, Carolina Rodríguez Enríquez, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 2021 (2021): Issue 1Next article