References
- 1Alsaadani, S., & Bleil De Souza, C. (2018). Performer, consumer or expert? A critical review of building performance simulation training paradigms for building design decision-making. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 12(3), 289–307. 10.1080/19401493.2018.1447602
- 2American Institute of Architects. (2019). Architect’s guide to integrating building performance simulation in the design process.
https://www.aia.org/resource-center/architects-guide-building-performance - 3Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89(4), 369. 10.1037/0033-295X.89.4.369
- 4Anderson, K. (2014). Design energy simulation for architects: Guide to 3D graphics. Routledge.
- 5Beausoleil-Morrison, I. (2019). Learning the fundamentals of building performance simulation through an experiential teaching approach. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 12(3), 308–325. 10.1080/19401493.2018.1479773
- 6Charles, P. P., & Thomas, C. R. (2009). Four approaches to teaching with building performance simulation tools in undergraduate architecture and engineering education. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 2(2), 95–114. 10.1080/19401490802592798
- 7Checkland, P., & Casar, A. (1986). Vickers’ concept of an appreciative system: A systemic account. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 13(3), 3–17.
- 8Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: An overview. Design Studies, 25(5), 427–441. 10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.002
- 9Cross, N. (2007). Designerly ways of knowing. Birkhäuser.
- 10den Hartog, J., Koutamanis, A., & Luscuere, P. (1998). Simulation and evaluation of environmental aspects throughout the design process. Paper presented at the Fourth Design and Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning Maastricht, the Netherlands.
https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=453ba5693b61f0d9be320f789f6a07d3cd495d92 - 11Dervin, B. (1998). Sense-making theory and practice: An overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(2), 36–46. 10.1108/13673279810249369
- 12Doelling, M., & Jastram, B. (2013). Daylight prototypes: From simulation data to four-dimensional artefact. Paper presented at the Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 2013).
https://www.academia.edu/download/34092922/DaylightPrototypes_Doelling_CAADRIA2013.pdf - 13Doelling, M., & Nasrollahi, F. (2012). Building performance modeling in non-simplified architectural design. Proceedings of the 30th CAAD Curriculum, 1, 97–106.
https://www.academia.edu/download/78350781/ecaade2012_116.content.04662.pdf - 14Dritsa, D., & Houben, S. (2024). How design researchers make sense of data visualizations in data-driven design: An uncertainty-aware sensemaking model. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interactions, 31(6), 1–53. 10.1145/3685268
- 15Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133–187. 10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80038-X
- 16Fernandez-Antolin, M.-M., del-Rio, J.-M., del Ama Gonzalo, F., & Gonzalez-Lezcano, R.-A. (2020). The relationship between the use of building performance simulation tools by recent graduate architects and the deficiencies in architectural education. Energies (Basel), 13(5), 1134. 10.3390/en13051134
- 17Gero, J. S. (1990). Design prototypes: A knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine, 11(4), 26–36. 10.1609/aimag.v11i4.854
- 18Griffith, T. L. (1999). Technology features as triggers for sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 472–488. 10.5465/amr.1999.2202132
- 19Hamza, N., & Horne, M. (2007). Educating the designer: An operational model for visualizing low-energy architecture. Building and Environment, 42(11), 3841–3847. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.11.003
- 20Kim, J., Phillips, B., & W Braham, W. (2013). Discovery–performance–design. Paper presented at the Building Simulation 2013. 10.26868/25222708.2013.1378
- 21Klein, G., Moon, B., & Hoffman, R. R. (2006). Making sense of sensemaking 1: Alternative perspectives. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21(4), 70–73. 10.1109/MIS.2006.75
- 22Klein, G., Phillips, J. K., Rall, E. L., & Peluso, D. A. (2007). A data-frame theory of sensemaking. In Hoffman, R. R. (Ed.), Expertise out of context: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Naturalistic Decision Making (pp. 118–160).
Psychology Press . - 23Kolko, J. (2010) Sensemaking and framing: A theoretical reflection on perspective in design synthesis. In Durling, D., Bousbaci, R., Chen, L, Gauthier, P., Poldma, T., Roworth-Stokes, S., & Stolterman, E. (Eds.), Design and complexity—DRS International Conference 2010, Montreal, QC, Canada,
7–9 July 2010 .https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/drs-conference-papers/drs2010/researchpapers/67 - 24LaVine, L. (2001). Mechanics and meaning in architecture, new ed. University of Minnesota Press. 10.5749/j.cttts8jd
- 25Lawson, B. (2002). CAD and creativity: Does the computer really help? Leonardo, 35(3), 327–331. 10.1162/002409402760105361
- 26Li, Y., Chen, J., & Feng, L. (2013). Dealing with uncertainty: A survey of theories and practices. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 25(11), 2463–2482. 10.1109/TKDE.2012.179
- 27Linderoth, H. C. J. (2017). From visions to practice—The role of sensemaking, institutional logic and pragmatic practice. Construction Management and Economics, 35(6), 324–337. 10.1080/01446193.2016.1250930
- 28Lloyd, P., & Scott, P. (1995). Difference in similarity: Interpreting the architectural design process. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 22(4), 383–406. 10.1068/b220383
- 29Loukissas, Y. A. (2012). Co-designers: Cultures of computer simulation in architecture. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203123065
- 30Lurås, S. (2016). Systems intertwined: A systemic view on the design situation. Design Issues, 32(3), 30–41. 10.1162/DESI_a_00397
- 31Madina, R. F., Pratiwi, S. N., & Tundono, S. (2021). Architecture students experience on optimizing building design using BPS—Lesson learned. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 738(1), 012069. 10.1088/1755-1315/738/1/012069
- 32Oliveira, S., Marco, E., Gething, B., & Robertson, C. (2017). Exploring energy modelling in architecture logics of investment and risk. Energy Procedia, 111, 61–70. 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.008
- 33Passe, U. (2020). A design workflow for integrating performance into architectural education. Buildings & Cities, 1(1), 565–578. 10.5334/bc.48
- 34Peters, B. (2018). Computing the environment: Digital design tools for simulation and visualisation of sustainable architecture (Vol. 6). Wiley.
- 35Picon, A. (2010). Digital culture in architecture: An introduction for the design professions. Birkhäuser.
- 36Pirolli, P., & Card, S. (2005). The sensemaking process and leverage points for analyst technology as identified through cognitive task analysis. In Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligence Analysis.
- 37Reinhart, C. F., Dogan, T., Ibarra, D., & Samuelson, H. W. (2012). Learning by playing—Teaching energy simulation as a game. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 5(6), 359–368. 10.1080/19401493.2011.619668
- 38Rowe, P. G. (1987). Design thinking. MIT Press.
- 39Russell, D. M., Stefik, M. J., Pirolli, P., & Card, S. K. (1993). The cost structure of sensemaking. In Proceedings of the INTERACT ’93 and CHI ’93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 10.1145/169059.169209
- 40Rylander Eklund, A., Navarro Aguiar, U., & Amacker, A. (2022). Design thinking as sensemaking: Developing a pragmatist theory of practice to (re)introduce sensibility. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 39(1), 24–43. 10.1111/jpim.12604
- 41Sandberg, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2015). Making sense of the sensemaking perspective: Its constituents, limitations, and opportunities for further development. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), S6–S32. 10.1002/job.1937
- 42Schmid, A. L. (2008). The introduction of building simulation into an architectural faculty: Preliminary findings. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 1(3), 197–208. 10.1080/19401490802500726
- 43Schön, D. A. (1985). The design studio: An exploration of its traditions and potentials. RIBA Publications for RIBA Building Industry Trust.
- 44Schön, D. A. (1988). Toward a marriage of artistry & applied science in the architectural design studio. Journal of Architectural Education, 41(4), 4–10. 10.1080/10464883.1988.10758496
- 45Schön, D. A. (1992). The theory of inquiry: Dewey’s legacy to education. Curriculum Inquiry, 22(2), 119–139. 10.1080/03626784.1992.11076093
- 46Snowden, D. (2005). Multi-ontology sense making: A new simplicity in decision making. Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics, 13(1), 45–53. 10.14236/jhi.v13i1.578
- 47Soebarto, V., Hopfe, C. J., Crawley, D., & Rawal, R. (2015). Capturing the views of architects about building performance simulation to be used during design processes. Mathur, J., & Garg, V. (Eds.), Conference Proceedings of Building Simulation 2015 (pp. 1480–1487).
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/79091788.pdf - 48Suwa, M., Gero, J., & Purcell, T. (2000). Unexpected discoveries and S-invention of design requirements: Important vehicles for a design process. Design Studies, 21(6), 539–567. 10.1016/S0142-694X(99)00034-4
- 49Vickers, G. (1965). The art of judgment: A study of policy making. Chapman & Hall.
- 50Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Sage.
- 51Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2014).
Organizing and the process of sensemaking . In Shamiyeh, M. (Ed.), Driving desired futures: Turning design thinking into real innovation (pp. 216–235). De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783038212843.216