Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Deconstruction of the Discourse of Femininity: A Case of Thai Girls’ Schools Cover

Deconstruction of the Discourse of Femininity: A Case of Thai Girls’ Schools

Open Access
|Nov 2021

References

  1. Abdi, R., & Basarati, A. (2018). Legitimation in discourse and communication revisited: A critical view towards legitimizing identities in communication. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 6(1), 86–100.
  2. Aroonmanakun, W. (2007, December 13–15). Thoughts on word and sentence segmentation in Thai. Seventh Symposium on Natural language Processing 2007, Pattaya, Thailand.
  3. Anderson, E. & Grace, K. (2018). From schoolgirls to “virtuous” Khmer women: Interrogating Chbab Srey and gender in Cambodian education policy. Studies in Social Justice, 12(2), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v12i2.162610.26522/ssj.v12i2.1626
  4. Arya, T. (2020). Exploring discourse marker use in Thai university students’ conversations. LEARN, 13(1), 247–267.
  5. Athamneh, S., & Benjamin, O. (2019). Education as weapon: Poverty and school for Palestinian adolescent girls living in Israel. Gender and Education, 33(2), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2019.168565510.1080/09540253.2019.1685655
  6. Ault, M. K., Ness, A. M., Taylor, W. D., Johnson, G., Connelly, S., Jensen, M. L., & Dunbar, N. E. (2017). Ideological lens matters: Credibility heuristics, pre-existing attitudes, and reactions to messages on ideological websites. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.05310.1016/j.chb.2016.11.053
  7. Chris, B., & Pasuk, P. (2005). A history of Thailand. Cambridge University Press.
  8. Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. Continuum.10.5040/9781350933996
  9. Becker, J. C., & Wright, S. C. (2011). Yet another dark side of chivalry: Benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/a002261510.1037/a0022615
  10. Bingöl, D., Şener, İ., & Çevik, E. (2013). The effect of organizational culture on organizational image and identity: Evidence from a pharmaceutical company. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, 222–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.48910.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.489
  11. Brezina, V., McEnery, T., & Wattam, S. (2015). Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(2), 139–173. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.2.01bre10.1075/ijcl.20.2.01bre
  12. Bui, M.-T. T., & Permpoonwiwat, C. K. (2015). Gender wage inequality in Thailand: A sectoral perspective. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 10(2), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.14456/ijbs.2015.40
  13. Chareonkul, C., & Wijitsopon, R. (2020). The English present perfect in authentic use and textbooks: A corpus-driven study. PASAA, 60, 275–308.10.58837/CHULA.PASAA.60.1.10
  14. Chinlumprasert, N. (2001). Date rape perceptions of Thai university students. AU Journal of Technology, 5(1), 37–58.
  15. Chuaikun, D., & Wijitsopon, R. (2021). A corpus-based study of LGBT-related news discourse in Thailand’s and international English-language newspapers. Applied Linguistics Review. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2021-003610.1515/applirev-2021-0036
  16. Costa, L. (1997). Exploring the history of women’s education and activism in Thailand. A Journal of the Southeast Asian Studies Student Association, 1(2).
  17. Cutting, J. E. (1999). The grammar of the in-group code. Applied Linguistics, 20(2), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.2.17910.1093/applin/20.2.179
  18. Daniel, I. O. A. (2013). Language as a power positioning tool: National open university of Nigeria (noun) English course materials as genderised examples. Journal on English Language Teaching, 3(3), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.3.3.241510.26634/jelt.3.3.2415
  19. Farr, F. & O’Keeffe, A. (2002). Would as a hedging device in an Irish context. In R. Reppen, S. M. Fitzmaurice, & D. Biber (Eds.), Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation (pp. 25–48). John Benjamin Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.9.04far10.1075/scl.9.04far
  20. Firdaus, F. A., & Mariyat, A. (2017). Humanistic approach in education according to Paulo Freire. At-Ta’dib, 12(2), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.21111/at-tadib.v12i2.126410.21111/at-tadib.v12i2.1264
  21. Ford, N., & Kittisuksathit, S. (1996). Youth sexuality: The sexual awareness, lifestyles and related-health service needs of young, single factory workers in Thailand. Institute for Population and Social Research.
  22. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.49110.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
  23. Hackett, S., Parmanto, B., & Zeng, X. (2005). A retrospective look at website accessibility over time. Behaviour & Information Technology, 24(6), 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929050006666110.1080/01449290500066661
  24. Hamid, B. A., Keong, Y. C., Othman, Z., Subakir, M., Yasin, M., & Baharuddin, J. H. (2013). A corpus-based investigation of gender stereotyping and linguistic sexism in Qatari primary school science textbooks. Pertranika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 21, 197–218.
  25. Hawkins, M. & Norton, B. (2009). Critical language teacher education. In A. Burns, & J. Richards (Eds.), Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp. 30–39). Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139042710.006
  26. Hays, J. (2014). Thailand. Facts and Details. http://factsanddetails.com/southeast-asia/Thailand
  27. Isaraphakdi, P. (2000). Sexual attitudes and experience of rural Thai youth. Institute for Population and Social Research.
  28. Jarunratanakul, P., & Jinchang, K. (2018). Does sexism affect Thai women’s psychological and behavioural responses? The stereotype threat-buffering effect of mindfulness. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2018.1010.1017/prp.2018.10
  29. Jaworska, S., & Ryan, K. (2018). Gender and the language of pain in chronic and terminal illness: A corpus-based discourse analysis of patients’ narratives. Social Science & Medicine, 215, 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.09.00210.1016/j.socscimed.2018.09.002
  30. Jimenez, E., Lockheed, M., & Wattanawaha, N. (1988). The relative efficiency of private and public schools: The case of Thailand. The World Bank Economic Review, 2(2), 139–164. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/2.2.13910.1093/wber/2.2.139
  31. Jimenez, E., Lockheed, M. E., & Mundial, B. (1988). The relative effectiveness of single-sex and coeducational schools in Thailand. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
  32. Kaptein, M. (1998). Ethics management. In K. Muel (Ed.), Ethics Management (pp. 31–45). Springer.10.1007/978-94-011-4978-5_3
  33. Konner, M. (2012, October 1). Misogyny, chauvinism, sexism, or what? Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-tangled-wing/201210/misogyny-chauvinism-sexism-or-what
  34. Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. Columbia University Press.
  35. Lavrusheva, O. (2013). Discursive legitimation strategies in the media. Case study of the UK retail planning policy [Master Thesis, Aalto University]. https://aaltodoc2.org.aalto.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/12749/hse_ethesis_13528.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  36. Lee, J. F. (2018). Gender representation in Japanese EFL textbooks: A corpus study. Gender and Education, 30(3), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.121469010.1080/09540253.2016.1214690
  37. Louw, B. (1993). Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In M. Baker, G. Francis, & E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and technology (pp. 157–176). John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/z.64.11lou
  38. Louw, S., Watson Todd, R., & Jimarkon, P. (2016). Teacher trainers’ beliefs about feedback on teaching practice: Negotiating the tensions between authoritativeness and dialogic space. Applied Linguistics, 37(6), 745–764.
  39. Lynne, F. (2002). Corpus-based analysis in AEP. In F. John (Ed.), Academic Discourse (pp. 95–114). Routledge.
  40. Flowerdew, L. (2004). The argument for using English specialized corpora to understand academic and professional language. In U. Connor, & T. A. Upton (Eds.), Discourse in the professions: Perspectives from corpus linguistics. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.16.02flo10.1075/scl.16.02flo
  41. Ma, B. K C. (1993). Small-corpora concordancing in ESL teaching and learning. Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 16, 11–30.
  42. Matthews, A., & Kotzee, B. (2020). UK university part-time higher education: A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of undergraduate prospectuses. Higher Education Research & Development, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.171373010.1080/07294360.2020.1713730
  43. Mills, S., & Mullany, L. (2011). Language, gender and feminism: Theory, methodology and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020381466610.4324/9780203814666
  44. Muecke, M. (2004). Guest Editorial: Shifting sexuality among lowland Thai women. Culture, health & sexuality, 6(3), 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369105041000168055510.1080/13691050410001680555
  45. Na Nakorn, P. (2019). Virtue and ethics (N. Satienchayakorn, Trans.). Office of the Civil Service Commission [Original work published 2012].
  46. Oakes, M. P. (1998). Statistics for corpus linguistics. Edinburgh University Press.
  47. O’Keeffe, A. (2007, July). The pragmatics of corpus linguistics. The Fourth Corpus Linguistics Conference 2007, Birmingham, United Kingdoms.
  48. Onozawa, N. (2001). Thai women: Changing status and roles during the course of Thai modernization. Bulletin of Tokyo Kasei Gakuin Tsukuba Women’s University, 5, 81–99.
  49. Papulova, Z. (2014). The significance of vision and mission development for enterprises in Slovak Republic. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 2(1), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.7763/JOEBM.2014.V2.9010.7763/JOEBM.2014.V2.90
  50. Persaud, W. H. (2005). Gender, race and global modernity: A perspective from Thailand. Globalizations, 2(2), 210–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/1474773050020221410.1080/14747730500202214
  51. Pitukwong, K., Soranasathaporn, S., Thanathiti, T., & Engchuan, K. (2014). An investigation of vocabulary learning strategies employed by high and low English proficiency students based on selected vocabulary from a business corpus. Asian International Journal of Social Sciences, 14(1), 106–119. https://doi.org/10.29139/aijss.2014010610.29139/aijss.20140106
  52. Phili, C., & Ellece, S. E. (2013). Women in the news: Representations of women in the Sunday Standard newspaper in Botswana-A linguistic perspective. PULA: Botswana Journal of African Studies, 27(2), 218–236.
  53. Prabjandee, D. (2014). Journey to becoming a Thai-English teacher: New perspective on investigating teacher attrition. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 60(3), 522–537.10.55016/ojs/ajer.v60i3.55947
  54. Pramoj, K. (1998). Four Reigns. Silkworm Books.
  55. Rampton, M. (2015, October 25). Four waves of feminism. Pacificu. https://www.pacificu.edu/magazine/four-waves-feminism
  56. Regoli, N. (2019, April 30). 19 advantages and disadvantages of mixed gender schools. Connect Us. https://connectusfund.org/6-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-mixed-gender-schools
  57. Riissanen, A., & Watson, G. (2014). Gender difference in the use of thought representation: A corpus-based study. English Language Teaching, 7(3), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n3p7110.5539/elt.v7n3p71
  58. Robkob, R. (2008). A study of the evolution of women’s roles in Thai higher education institutions. International Forum of Teaching and Studies, 9(1), 39–45.
  59. Romanow, L. (2012). The women of Thailand. Global Majority E-Journal, 3(1), 44–60.
  60. Ruvio, A., Rosenblatt, Z., & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (2010). Entrepreneurial leadership vision in nonprofit VS. for-profit organizations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 144–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.10.01110.1016/j.leaqua.2009.10.011
  61. Salahshour, N. (2016). Liquid metaphors as positive evaluations: A corpus-assisted discourse analysis of the representation of migrants in a daily New Zealand newspaper. Discourse, Context & Media, 13, 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2016.07.00210.1016/j.dcm.2016.07.002
  62. Slattery, P., Finnegan, P., & Vidgen, R. (2019). Creating compassion: How volunteering websites encourage prosocial behaviour. Information and Organization, 29(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.02.00110.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.02.001
  63. Somswasdi, V. (2003). Women’s studies in Thailand. The UNESCO Conference on Women’s Studies in Asia, Bangkok, Thailand.
  64. Stubbs, M. (2001). Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics. Blackwell Publishers.
  65. Tantiwiramanond, D., & Pandey, S. R. (2008). Does advocacy matter? Women’s advocacy campaigns in Thailand. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES). http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/thailand/07042.pdf
  66. Thaweesit, S. (2004). The fluidity of Thai women’s gendered and sexual subjectivities. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 6(3), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/136910503100015636010.1080/1369105031000156360
  67. Tyson, L. (2014). Critical theory today: A user-friendly guide. Routledge.10.4324/9781315760797
  68. Wijitsopon, R. (2021). A corpus-based study of Thai and English quantity word equivalents: Laay, several and many. REFLections, 28(2), 188–207.10.61508/refl.v28i2.252502
  69. Yaguchi, M., Iyeiri, Y., & Baba, Y. (2010). Speech style and gender distinctions in the use of very and real/really: An analysis of the Corpus of Spoken professional American English. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(3), 585–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.00210.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.002
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sm-2021-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2335-2027 | Journal ISSN: 2335-2019
Language: English
Page range: 39 - 68
Published on: Nov 15, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Natakorn Satienchayakorn, Pattamawan Jimarkon, published by Vytautas Magnus University, Institute of Foreign Languages
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.