References
- Bartnikaitė, E., & Bijeikienė, V. (2017). Perspectives in legal English in-service education: Needs analysis in Lithuanian context. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 49(62), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1515/Slgr-2017-000210.1515/slgr-2017-0002
- Bijeikienė, V., & Pundziuvienė, D. (2015). IDKM diegimas Lietuvos bendrojo lavinimo mokyklose: atvejo analizė. Santalka: Filologija, Edukologija / Coactivity: Philology, Educology, 23(1), 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/cpe.2015.25210.3846/cpe.2015.252
- Coyle, D., Hood, P. & Marsh, D. (2010). Content and language integrated learning. CUP.
- de Bos, K. (2014). The effectiveness of early foreign language learning in the Netherlands. SSLLT, 4(3), 409–418. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.3.210.14746/ssllt.2014.4.3.2
- Hogan-Brun, G. (2017). Linguanomics: What is the market potential of multilingualism? Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781474238304
- Larson-Hall, J. (2008). Weighing the benefits of studying a foreign language at a younger starting age in a minimal input situation. Second Language Research, 24(1), 35–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/026765830708298110.1177/0267658307082981
- Mačianskienė, N., & Bijeikienė V. (2019). Metacognitive awareness as the basis of learner formative assessment in developing plurilingual competence in higher education. Conference paper in EDULEARN19 11th annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies. Palma de Mallorca (Spain), 1st–3rd of July.10.21125/edulearn.2019.1383
- Mehmedbegovic, D., & Bak, T. H. (2017). Towards an interdisciplinary lifetime approach to multilingualism. European Journal of Language Policy, 9(2), 150–167. https://doi.org/10.3828/ejlp.2017.1010.3828/ejlp.2017.10
- Meisel, J. (2013). Sensitive phases in successive language acquisition: The critical period hypothesis revisited. In C. Boeckx, & K. K. Grohmann (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Biolinguistics, 69–85. CUP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978051198043510.1017/CBO9780511980435
- Morrison, L. (2016, October 31). Native English speakers are the world’s worst communicators. http://www.bbc.com/capital/story/20161028-native-english-speakers-are-the-worlds-worst-communicators
- Muñoz, C. (2009). Input and long-term effects of early learning in a formal setting. In M. Nikolov (Ed.), The age factor and early language learning, 141–160. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110218282.14110.1515/9783110218282.141
- Myles, F. (2017). Learning foreign languages in primary schools: is younger better? Languages, Society & Policy. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9806
- Curtiss S. (n. d.). Ñandutí foreign language learning grades preK-8. http://www.cal.org/earlylang/index.html
- Nikolov, M. (Ed.). (2009). The age factor and early language learning. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/978311021828210.1515/9783110218282
- Lenneberg, E., H. (1967). Biological Foundations of Language. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1080/21548331.1967.11707799
- Penfield, W., & Roberts, L. (1959). Speech and Brain Mechanisms. Princeton UP.
- Phillipson, R. (2018). Language Challenges in Global and Regional Integration. Sustainable Multilingualism, 12, 14–35. https://doi.org/10.2478/sm-2018-000110.2478/sm-2018-0001
- Singleton, D. (2007). The critical period hypothesis: Some problems. Interlingüística, 17, 48–56.
- Surmont, J., Struys, E., van den Noort, M., & van de Craen, P. (2016). The effects of CLIL on mathematical content learning: A longitudinal study. SSLLT, 6(2), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.2.710.14746/ssllt.2016.6.2.7
- van de Craen, P., Mondt K., Allain, L., & Gao, Y. (2007). Why and how CLIL works. An outline for a CLIL theory. CLIL Special Issue 2, 16(3), 70–78.
- Viernes, G. B., Boven, C., & Pinho, S. (2019). Why do adults decide to learn a minority language? A study of the motivation(s) of potential new speakers of west Frisian. Sustainable Multilingualism, 14, 138–158. https://doi.org/10.2478/sm-2019-000710.2478/sm-2019-0007