Self-efficacy beliefs among prospective teachers about inclusive geography education: Examining the relationships of general and geography-specific beliefs using structural equation modelling

Winklmaier, Ann-Sophie; Schubert, Jan Christoph

doi:10.2478/ristal-2025-0003

Abstract

Against the background of inclusion, teachers' self-efficacy beliefs about inclusive education are particularly relevant to the implementation of inclusive teaching. The present study focuses on how general and subject-specific (in this case geography-specific) constructs influence the self-efficacy beliefs of prospective geography teachers about inclusive geography teaching.

A survey of prospective geography teachers measured self-efficacy beliefs about inclusive geography teaching (SEB-IGT), beliefs about inclusive geography teaching (B-IGT), general self-efficacy beliefs about teaching (SEB-T), and general attitudes towards inclusive education (A-IE). Assumptions regarding the relationships between the SEB-IGT and the other constructs under consideration were conceptualized theoretically and empirically. Structural equation modelling was utilized to assess the hypothesized impacts on the SEB-IGT. The findings revealed that the geography-specific B-IGT exerts the strongest positive effect on the SEB-IGT. It follows that the subject-specific constructs under consideration exert a more important influence on the geography- and inclusion-related SEB-IGT than the more general constructs.

References

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W.H. Freeman.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2006). Stichwort: Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 9(4), 469–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-006-0165-2
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2013). The COACTIV model of teachers' professional competence. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Mathematics teacher education: Vol. 8. Cognitive Activation in the Mathematics Classroom and Professional Competence of Teachers: Results from the COACTIV Project (pp. 25–48). Springer.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bosse, S., Henke, T., & Jäntsch, C. (2016). Die Entwicklung der Einstellung zum inklusiven Lernen und der Selbstwirksamkeit von Grundschullehrkräften. Empirische Sonderpädagogik(1), 103–116.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. Guilford publications.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bühner, M. (2011). Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion (3rd ed.). Psychologie. Pearson Studium.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modelling. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 22(1), 7–16.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chow, W. S. E. (2024). Examining factors influencing teachers' intentions in implementing inclusive practices in Hong Kong classrooms. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 24(2), 376–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12632
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2012). Spring cleaning for the “messy” construct of teachers' beliefs: What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us? In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, S. Graham, J. M. Royer, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Vol. 2. Individual Differences and Cultural and Contextual Factors (pp. 471–499). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13274-019
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Forlin, C. (2010). Teacher education for inclusion. In R. Rose (Ed.), Confronting Obstacles to Inclusion: International Responses to Developing Inclusive Education (pp. 155–170). Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gill, M. G., & Fives, H. (2015). Introduction. In H. Fives & M. G. Gill (Eds.), Educational Psychology Handbook Ser. International Handbook of Research on Teachers' Beliefs (1–10). Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gölitz, D., Thieroff, B., Tellesch-Bülow, C., Winklmaier, A.-S., Pluhatsch, V., & Schubert, J. C. (2021). Quantitative GeoLInk-Rohdaten - Designzyklus 2. Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5798630
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Grube, J. W., Mayton, D. M., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (1994). Inducing change in values, attitudes, and behaviors: Belief system theory and the method of value self-confrontation. Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01202.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Richter, N. F., & Hauff, S. (2024). Partial Least Squares Strukturgleichungsmodellierung: Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung (2nd ed.). Vahlen. https://doi.org/10.15358/9783800671465
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hecht, P., Niedermair, C., & Feyerer, E. (2016). Einstellungen und inklusionsbezogene Selbstwirksamkeitsüberzeugungen von Lehramtsstudierenden und Lehrpersonen im Berufseinstieg. Messverfahren und Befunde aus einem Mixed-Methods-Design. Empirische Sonderpädagogik(1), 86–102.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jorgensen, T. D., Pornprasertmanit, S., Schoemann, A. M., & Rosseel, Y. (2022). semTools (Version 0.5-6) [Computer software].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Klassen, R. M., & Tze, V. M. (2014). Teachers' self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12, 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.06.001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford publications.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kopp, B. (2009). Inklusive Überzeugungen und Selbstwirksamkeit im Umgang mit Heterogenität - Wie denken Studierende des Lehramts für Grundschulen? Empirische Sonderpädagogik, 1(1), 5–25.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Korkmaz, S., Göksülük, D., & Zararsiz, G. (2021). MVN: An R Package for Assessing Multivariate Normality. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MVN/vignettes/MVN.html
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kuckartz, U., Rädiker, S., Ebert, T., & Schehl, J. (2013). Statistik. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19890-3
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Li, C.-H. (2014). The Performance of MLR, USLMV, and WLSMV Estimation in Structural Regression Models with Ordinal Variables [Dissertation, Michigan State University]. DataCite.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Little, T. D., Card, N. A., Bovaird, J. A., Preacher, K. J., & Crandall, C. S. (2007). Structural equation modeling of mediation and moderation with context factors. In T. D. Little, J. A. Bovaird, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Modeling Contextual Effects in Longitudinal Studies (pp. 207–230). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Little, T. D., Rhemtulla, M., Gibson, K., & Schoemann, A. M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn't be one. Psychological Methods, 18(3), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033266
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lüke, T., & Grosche, M. (2017). Professionsunabhängige Einstellungsskala zum Inklusiven Schulsystem (PREIS).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lüke, T., & Grosche, M. (2018). Konstruktion und Validierung der Professionsunabhängigen Einstellungsskala zum Inklusiven Schulsystem (PREIS). Empirische Sonderpädagogik, 10(1), 3–20.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Miesera, S., & Gebhardt, M. (2018). Inclusive vocational schools in Canada and Germany. A comparison of vocational pre-service teachers' attitudes, self-efficacy and experiences towards inclusive education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 33(5), 707–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2017.1421599
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rhemtulla, M. (2016). Population performance of SEM parceling strategies under measurement and structural model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 21(3), 348–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000072
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. P. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (2^nd ed., pp. 102–119). Macmillan.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rokeach, M. (1963). The organization and modification of beliefs. The Centennial Review, 7(4), 375–395.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rönkkö, M., & Cho, E. (2022). An updated guideline for assessing discriminant validity. Organizational Research Methods, 25(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120968614
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Savolainen, H., Engelbrecht, P., Nel, M., & Malinen, O.-P. (2012). Understanding teachers' attitudes and self-efficacy in inclusive education: Implications for pre-service and in-service teacher education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 27(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2011.613603
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schubert, J. C., Winklmaier, A.-S. (2023). Inklusiver Geographieunterricht. In D. Böhn (Ed.), Wörterbuch der Geographiedidaktik: Definitionen, Klassifikationen, Diskussionen, (2^nd ed., pp. 124–25). Westermann.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schubert, J. C., Winklmaier, A.-S., & Gölitz, D. (2021). Hinweise zu den quantitativen GeoLInk-Rohdaten - Designzyklus 2. Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5798688
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schulte, K. (2008). Selbstwirksamkeitserwartungen in der Lehrerbildung: Zur Struktur und dem Zusammenhang von Lehrer-Selbstwirksamkeitserwartungen, Pädagogischem Professionswissen und Persönlichkeitseigenschaften bei Lehramtsstudierenden und Lehrkräften [Dissertation, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (2002). Das Konzept der Selbstwirksamkeit. Zeitschrift Für Pädagogik(44), 28–53.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sharma, U., & Jacobs, K. E. (2016). Predicting in-service educators' intentions to teach in inclusive classrooms in India and Australia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.12.004
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sharma, U., Loreman, T., & Forlin, C. (2012). Measuring teacher efficacy to implement inclusive practices. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2011.01200.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using Multivariate Statistics (7^th ed.). Always learning. Pearson. https://www.pearsonhighered.com/assets/preface/0/1/3/4/0134790545.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Thieroff, B., Tellesch-Bülow, C., Winklmaier, A.-S., Pluhatsch, V., Gölitz, D., & Schubert, J. C. (2021). Instrument zur Messung von Überzeugungen, Selbstwirksamkeitserwartungen und fachdidaktischem Wissen von (angehenden) Lehrpersonen für inklusiven Geographieunterricht: GeoLInk-Fragebogen mit Skalenbenennungen und Itemkürzeln. Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5801462
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
UNESCO. (2019). Promoting Inclusive Teacher Education: Introduction (2^nd ed.).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Urton, K., Wilbert, J., & Hennemann, T. (2015). Die Einstellung zur Integration und die Selbstwirksamkeit von Lehrkräften. Psychologie in Erziehung Und Unterricht, 62(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.2378/peu2015.art09d
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Winklmaier, A.-S., & Schubert, J. C. (2024). Inklusiver Geographieunterricht – Grundlagen, Perspektiven und Leitlinien. Zeitschrift für Geographiedidaktik, 52(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.60511/52214
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Woodcock, S., Gibbs, K., Hitches, E., & Regan, C. (2023). Investigating teachers' beliefs in inclusive education and their levels of teacher self-efficacy: Are teachers constrained in their capacity to implement inclusive teaching practices? Education Sciences, 13(280), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030280
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Woodcock, S., Sharma, U., Subban, P., & Hitches, E. (2022). Teacher self-efficacy and inclusive education practices: Rethinking teachers' engagement with inclusive practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 117, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103802
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Spero, R. B. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(4), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.007
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yada, A., Leskinen, M., Savolainen, H., & Schwab, S. (2022). Meta-analysis of the relationship between teachers' self-efficacy and attitudes toward inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103521
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Self-efficacy beliefs among prospective teachers about inclusive geography education: Examining the relationships of general and geography-specific beliefs using structural equation modelling

Abstract

Paradigm

My account