Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Statistical and Metrological Framework for Evaluation of micro-CT 3D Data with Application to Dental Implant Components Cover

Statistical and Metrological Framework for Evaluation of micro-CT 3D Data with Application to Dental Implant Components

Open Access
|Oct 2026

References

  1. Kruth, J.-P., Bartscher, M., Carmignato, S., Schmitt, R., De Chiffre, L., Weckenmann, A. (2011). Computed tomography for dimensional metrology. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 60 (2), 821–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2011.05.006.
  2. Villarraga-Gómez, H., Lee, C., Smith, S. T. (2018). Dimensional metrology with X-ray CT: A comparison with CMM measurements on internal features and compliant structures. Precision Engineering, 51, 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.08.021.
  3. Schlecht, J., Ferley, E., Coughlin, S., Phillips, S. D., Lee, V. D., Shakarji, C. M. (2014). Evaluating CT for metrology: The influence of material thickness on measurements. In 11th European Conference on Non-Destructive Testing (ECNDT 2014). Brussels, Belgium: EFNDT, 1684–1693. ISBN 978-1-63439-504-5. https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=916961.
  4. Carmignato, S., Dreossi, D., Mancini, L., Marinello, F., Tromba, G., Savio, E. (2009). Testing of X-ray microtomography systems using a traceable geometrical standard. Measurement Science and Technology, 20 (8), 084021. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/20/8/084021.
  5. Dewulf, W., Kiekens, K., Tan, Y., Welkenhuyzen, F., Kruth, J.-P. (2013). Uncertainty determination and quantification for dimensional measurements with industrial computed tomography. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 62 (1), 535–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2013.03.017.
  6. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. (2008). Evaluation of measurement data—Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Standard JCGM 100:2008(E). https://doi.org/10.59161/JCGM100-2008E.
  7. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. (2020). Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement—Part 6: Developing and using measurement models. Standard JCGM GUM-6:2020. https://doi.org/10.59161/JCGMGUM-6-2020.
  8. Wimmer, G., Palenčár, R., Witkovský, V. (2002). Spracovanie a vyhodnocovanie meraní [Elaboration and Processing Measurement]. Bratislava: VEDA, Publishing House of the Slovak Academy of Science, ISBN 80-224-0734-8. (In Slovak)
  9. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. (2012). International vocabulary of metrology—Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM). 200:2012, JCGM. https://doi.org/10.59161/JCGM200-2012.
  10. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. (2008). Evaluation of measurement data—Supplement 1 to the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement”—Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method. . Standard JCGM 101:2008. https://doi.org/10.59161/JCGM101-2008.
  11. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. (2012). Evaluation of measurement data—The role of measurement uncertainty in conformity assessment. Standard JCGM 106:2012. https://doi.org/10.59161/JCGM106-2012.
Language: English
Page range: 267 - 277
Submitted on: Jul 6, 2026
Accepted on: Aug 25, 2026
Published on: Oct 13, 2026
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open

© 2026 Miroslav Hain, Alexander Šatka, Tomáš Czán, Andrej Czán, Mário Drbúl, Jaromír Markovič, Viktor Witkovský, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Measurement Science
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.