Can Metaeconomics be a Framework for MCDA in Management?

Antanas Buračas

doi:10.2478/mosr-2025-0010

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

Can Metaeconomics be a Framework for MCDA in Management?

Management of Organizations: Systematic Research

Volume 94 (2025): Issue 1 (December 2025)

By: Antanas Buračas

Open Access

|Apr 2026

Abstract

Metaeconomics is a methodological system integrating MCDA to bridge the gap between economics and management. It assesses multidimensional cases such as competitiveness, sustainability, and resilience in management. The paper reviews its principles, evaluates its strengths and limitations, and considers its perspective.

References

Allen, J. C., Tainter, J. A., Hoekstra, T. W. (2000). Supply-Side Sustainability // Systems Research and Behavioral Science. Vol. 16, pp. 403–427.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Belton, V., Stewart, T. J. (2002). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. – Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bilbao-Osorio, B., et al. (2014, 2015). The Global Information Technology Report: Rewards and risks of big data, 2014; ICTs for inclusive growth, 2015. – INSEAD-World Economic Forum.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Buračas, A. (1968). O štrukturnosti metodologie a o socialnych funkciach ekonomickych teorii (On Structure of Methodology and Social Functions of Economic Theories) // Ekonomicky časopis, July; Rev. in: Соревнование двух систем. Актуальные проблемы мировой экономики (1970), pp. 225–238. – Moscow, Nauka, USSR Acad. of Sciences.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Buračas, A. (1985). Metatheoretical Conceptualization of Social Preferences // Science of Science. Vol. 3–4, pp. 265–286.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Buračas, A. (2004). On Paradigm of Metaeconomics: Essence and Sense. // Organizacijų vadyba: sisteminiai tyrimai / Management of Organizations: Systematic Research. Vol. 29, pp. 21–35.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Buračas, A., Zvirblis, A., Lopes, I. T. (2012). Metaeconomics Approach & Intellectual Resources Evaluation. Multiple objective methods: integrating into decision making. – Saarbrücken (Germany). doi 10.13140/2.1.5186.3842
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Buračas, A., Žvirblis, A. (2012) Backgrounds of Aggregated Assessment of SMEs Competitive Advantage Determinants // TEM Journal – Technology, Education, Management, Informatics. Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 213–220.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Buracas, A., Navickas, V., Žvirblis, A. (2013). Knowledge Potential: Main Aggregated Assessment Principles // Journal of Knowledge Economy and Knowledge Management = Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi. Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 63–86.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Buračas, A., Navickas, V. (2015) Contents of Global Talent Evaluations: Baltics & Serbia // TEM Journal – Technology, Education, Management, Informatics. Association for Information Communication Technology Education and Science. Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 187–196.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Buračas, A. (2017). Metaeconomic Approaches in Global Management / In Economy, Finance and Business in Southeastern and Central Europe: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Economies of the Balkan and Eastern European Countries in the Changing World (EBEEC) in Split (Croatia, 2016), Ch. 43, Springer Nature.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Buracas, A., Rutkauskas, A. V., Starkeviciute, M. (2021). Universal Sustainability: Metaeconomic Issues. – Generis.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Buracas, A., Zelvys, R., Starkeviciute, M. (2025). Innovations intellectuelles et compétences: Approche multicritères, 128 p. – Éditions Notre Savoir.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Clower, R. W. (1995). Axiomatics in Economics // Southern Economic Journal. Vol. 62, No. 2, pp. 307–319. doi:10.2307/1060684.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Crosser, P. K. (1974). Prolegomena to All Future Metaeconomics. – Saint Louis.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dopfer, K., Foster, J., Potts, J. (2004). Micro-Meso-Macro // Evolutionary Economics – Springer. Internet access: https://ssrn.com/abstract=721599 [accessed June 25, 2025].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2014, 2015, 2022). The Global Innovation Index: The Human Factor in Innovation, 2014; Effective Innovation Policies for Development, 2015; What is the Future of Innovation-Driven Growth? 2022. – INSEAD – Johnson Cornell Univ. WIPO.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Global Indicator Framework for the Sustainable Development Goals and Targets of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (2020). – UN Gen Ass., A/RES/71/313. Internet access: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/indicators-list/ [accessed June 20, 2025].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
The Global Talent Competitiveness Index (2014–15; 2023). Growing Talent for Today and Tomorrow, 2014; Talent Attraction and International Mobility, 2015; Ten Years, 2023. Ed. B. Lanvin et al. – INSEAD, Descartes Institute for the Future & Human Capital Leadership Institute.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Greco, S., Ehrgott, M., Figueira, J. R. (2016). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys (2nd ed.). – Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
A Holistic Scientific Vision of the Future World. – WIF, London. Internet access: http://www.thewif.org.uk/wif.php?xy=1600&pl=win32; http://www.thewif.org.uk/version2/wif/mainmission.html [accessed July 14, 2025].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Inclusive Wealth Report. (2014). Measuring Progress Toward Sustainability: Summary for Decision-Makers. – UNU-IHDP-UNEP, Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Inclusive Wealth Report. (2018). Measuring Sustainability and Well-Being. – UNU-IHDPUNEP, Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
An Introductory Guide to Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) (2025). – Government Analysis Function. Internet access: https://analysisfunction.civilservice.gov.uk/policy-store/an-introductory-guide-to-mcda/ [accessed July 14, 2025].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kickert, W. J. M., Van Gigch, J. P. (1979). A Metasystem Approach to Organizational Decision-making // Management Science, Vol. 25, No. 12, pp. 1217–1231.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Beom-Su Kim et al. (2022). A Survey on Analytical Models for Dynamic Resource Management in Wireless Body Area Networks // Ad Hoc Networks. Vol. 135, 102936. doi: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2022.102936
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lynne, G. D. (1999). Divided Self Models of the Socioeconomic Person: The Metaeconomics Approach // Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 28, No. 3.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lynne, G. D. (2003). Toward a Metaeconomic Foundation for the Right Kind of Economics. – AAEA-WAEA Annual Meeting.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lynne, G. D., Czap, N. V. (2023). Towards Dual Interest Theory in Metaeconomics // Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics. Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 7-25. doi:10.1177/02601079231172366
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Menger, K. (1954). The Logic of Laws of Return: A Study in Meta-Economics / In Economic Activity Analysis, ed. O. Morgenstern. – J. Wiley.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ocean, T. (2020). Intangible Asset Market Value Study. Internet access: chrome-extension:// ef aidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/ https://intellisys.fi/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Ocean-Tomo-Intangible-Asset-Market-Value-Study-IAMV-Report_08_01_17.pdf [accessed July 20, 2025].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Oliveira, M. D., Mataloto, I., Kanavos, P. (2019). Multi-criteria Decision Analysis for Health Technology Assessment: Addressing Methodological Challenges to Improve the State of the Art // The European Journal of Health Economics. Vol. 20.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Parkinson, M. (2016). Meta-economics: A New Vision. – Policy Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Porter, M. E. et al. (2015). Social Progress Index / In The Global Competitiveness Report. – World Economic Forum.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Roy, B. (1996). Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding. – Kluwer Acad. Publ., Berlin.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Saaty, T. L., Vargas, L. G. (2012). Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. – Springer.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Saarikoski, H. et al. (2016). Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Cost-Benefit Analysis: Comparing Alternative Frameworks for Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services // Ecosystem Services. Vol. 22, B, pp. 238–249.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small Is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered. – Vintage Books, London.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schwab, K., Sala-i-Martín, X. (2019). The Global Competitiveness Report. – World Economic Forum.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Policy Options. Internet access: https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/projects-activities/social-multi-criteria-evaluation-policy-options_en [accessed July 10, 2025].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Internet access: http://https//ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/8131721/8131772/Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi-Commission-report.pdf [accessed August 10, 2025].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study. – Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Options Appraisal of Economic Cases. (2024). Internet access: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/green-book-supplementary-guidance-multi-criteria-decision-analysis/use-of-multi-criteria-decision-analysis-in-options-appraisal-of-economic-cases [accessed July 10, 2025].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yoon, K. P., Hwang, C. L. (1995). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction. – SAGE Publications. doi:10.4135/9781412985161. n3
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, K. (2011). Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods in Economics: An Overview // Technological and Economic Development of Economy. Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 397–427. doi: 10.3846/20294913.2011.593291.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zeleny, M. (1982). Multiple Criteria Decision Making. – McGraw-Hill.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zsolnai, L. (2013). The Importance of Meta-economics / In Responsible Economics. E. F. Schumacher and his legacy for the 21st century, ed. H. Opdebeeck. – Oxford: P Lang Academic Publishing.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mosr-2025-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2335-8750 | Journal ISSN: 1392-1142

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 33 - 65

Submitted on: Aug 27, 2025

Accepted on: Dec 30, 2025

Published on: Apr 1, 2026

Published by: Vytautas Magnus University, Faculty of Economics and Management

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

Keywords:

metaeconomics,

management,

Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)

Related subjects:

Business and economics,

Business management,

Marketing, sales, customer relations,

Management, organization, corporate governance,

Business development, change management, cooperation,

Human resources, labor practice, job and career

© 2026 Antanas Buračas, published by Vytautas Magnus University, Faculty of Economics and Management
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 94 (2025): Issue 1 (December 2025)