Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Can Metaeconomics be a Framework for MCDA in Management? Cover
Open Access
|Apr 2026

References

  1. Allen, J. C., Tainter, J. A., Hoekstra, T. W. (2000). Supply-Side Sustainability // Systems Research and Behavioral Science. Vol. 16, pp. 403–427.
  2. Belton, V., Stewart, T. J. (2002). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. – Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  3. Bilbao-Osorio, B., et al. (2014, 2015). The Global Information Technology Report: Rewards and risks of big data, 2014; ICTs for inclusive growth, 2015. – INSEAD-World Economic Forum.
  4. Buračas, A. (1968). O štrukturnosti metodologie a o socialnych funkciach ekonomickych teorii (On Structure of Methodology and Social Functions of Economic Theories) // Ekonomicky časopis, July; Rev. in: Соревнование двух систем. Актуальные проблемы мировой экономики (1970), pp. 225–238. – Moscow, Nauka, USSR Acad. of Sciences.
  5. Buračas, A. (1985). Metatheoretical Conceptualization of Social Preferences // Science of Science. Vol. 3–4, pp. 265–286.
  6. Buračas, A. (2004). On Paradigm of Metaeconomics: Essence and Sense. // Organizacijų vadyba: sisteminiai tyrimai / Management of Organizations: Systematic Research. Vol. 29, pp. 21–35.
  7. Buračas, A., Zvirblis, A., Lopes, I. T. (2012). Metaeconomics Approach & Intellectual Resources Evaluation. Multiple objective methods: integrating into decision making. – Saarbrücken (Germany). doi 10.13140/2.1.5186.3842
  8. Buračas, A., Žvirblis, A. (2012) Backgrounds of Aggregated Assessment of SMEs Competitive Advantage Determinants // TEM Journal – Technology, Education, Management, Informatics. Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 213–220.
  9. Buracas, A., Navickas, V., Žvirblis, A. (2013). Knowledge Potential: Main Aggregated Assessment Principles // Journal of Knowledge Economy and Knowledge Management = Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi. Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 63–86.
  10. Buračas, A., Navickas, V. (2015) Contents of Global Talent Evaluations: Baltics & Serbia // TEM Journal – Technology, Education, Management, Informatics. Association for Information Communication Technology Education and Science. Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 187–196.
  11. Buračas, A. (2017). Metaeconomic Approaches in Global Management / In Economy, Finance and Business in Southeastern and Central Europe: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Economies of the Balkan and Eastern European Countries in the Changing World (EBEEC) in Split (Croatia, 2016), Ch. 43, Springer Nature.
  12. Buracas, A., Rutkauskas, A. V., Starkeviciute, M. (2021). Universal Sustainability: Metaeconomic Issues. – Generis.
  13. Buracas, A., Zelvys, R., Starkeviciute, M. (2025). Innovations intellectuelles et compétences: Approche multicritères, 128 p. – Éditions Notre Savoir.
  14. Clower, R. W. (1995). Axiomatics in Economics // Southern Economic Journal. Vol. 62, No. 2, pp. 307–319. doi:10.2307/1060684.
  15. Crosser, P. K. (1974). Prolegomena to All Future Metaeconomics. – Saint Louis.
  16. Dopfer, K., Foster, J., Potts, J. (2004). Micro-Meso-Macro // Evolutionary Economics – Springer. Internet access: https://ssrn.com/abstract=721599 [accessed June 25, 2025].
  17. Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2014, 2015, 2022). The Global Innovation Index: The Human Factor in Innovation, 2014; Effective Innovation Policies for Development, 2015; What is the Future of Innovation-Driven Growth? 2022. – INSEAD – Johnson Cornell Univ. WIPO.
  18. Global Indicator Framework for the Sustainable Development Goals and Targets of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (2020). – UN Gen Ass., A/RES/71/313. Internet access: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/indicators-list/ [accessed June 20, 2025].
  19. The Global Talent Competitiveness Index (2014–15; 2023). Growing Talent for Today and Tomorrow, 2014; Talent Attraction and International Mobility, 2015; Ten Years, 2023. Ed. B. Lanvin et al. – INSEAD, Descartes Institute for the Future & Human Capital Leadership Institute.
  20. Greco, S., Ehrgott, M., Figueira, J. R. (2016). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys (2nd ed.). – Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4
  21. A Holistic Scientific Vision of the Future World. – WIF, London. Internet access: http://www.thewif.org.uk/wif.php?xy=1600&pl=win32; http://www.thewif.org.uk/version2/wif/mainmission.html [accessed July 14, 2025].
  22. Inclusive Wealth Report. (2014). Measuring Progress Toward Sustainability: Summary for Decision-Makers. – UNU-IHDP-UNEP, Cambridge University Press.
  23. Inclusive Wealth Report. (2018). Measuring Sustainability and Well-Being. – UNU-IHDPUNEP, Cambridge University Press.
  24. An Introductory Guide to Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) (2025). – Government Analysis Function. Internet access: https://analysisfunction.civilservice.gov.uk/policy-store/an-introductory-guide-to-mcda/ [accessed July 14, 2025].
  25. Kickert, W. J. M., Van Gigch, J. P. (1979). A Metasystem Approach to Organizational Decision-making // Management Science, Vol. 25, No. 12, pp. 1217–1231.
  26. Beom-Su Kim et al. (2022). A Survey on Analytical Models for Dynamic Resource Management in Wireless Body Area Networks // Ad Hoc Networks. Vol. 135, 102936. doi: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2022.102936
  27. Lynne, G. D. (1999). Divided Self Models of the Socioeconomic Person: The Metaeconomics Approach // Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 28, No. 3.
  28. Lynne, G. D. (2003). Toward a Metaeconomic Foundation for the Right Kind of Economics. – AAEA-WAEA Annual Meeting.
  29. Lynne, G. D., Czap, N. V. (2023). Towards Dual Interest Theory in Metaeconomics // Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics. Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 7-25. doi:10.1177/02601079231172366
  30. Menger, K. (1954). The Logic of Laws of Return: A Study in Meta-Economics / In Economic Activity Analysis, ed. O. Morgenstern. – J. Wiley.
  31. Ocean, T. (2020). Intangible Asset Market Value Study. Internet access: chrome-extension:// ef aidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/ https://intellisys.fi/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Ocean-Tomo-Intangible-Asset-Market-Value-Study-IAMV-Report_08_01_17.pdf [accessed July 20, 2025].
  32. Oliveira, M. D., Mataloto, I., Kanavos, P. (2019). Multi-criteria Decision Analysis for Health Technology Assessment: Addressing Methodological Challenges to Improve the State of the Art // The European Journal of Health Economics. Vol. 20.
  33. Parkinson, M. (2016). Meta-economics: A New Vision. – Policy Press.
  34. Porter, M. E. et al. (2015). Social Progress Index / In The Global Competitiveness Report. – World Economic Forum.
  35. Roy, B. (1996). Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding. – Kluwer Acad. Publ., Berlin.
  36. Saaty, T. L., Vargas, L. G. (2012). Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. – Springer.
  37. Saarikoski, H. et al. (2016). Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Cost-Benefit Analysis: Comparing Alternative Frameworks for Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services // Ecosystem Services. Vol. 22, B, pp. 238–249.
  38. Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small Is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered. – Vintage Books, London.
  39. Schwab, K., Sala-i-Martín, X. (2019). The Global Competitiveness Report. – World Economic Forum.
  40. Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Policy Options. Internet access: https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/projects-activities/social-multi-criteria-evaluation-policy-options_en [accessed July 10, 2025].
  41. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Internet access: http://https//ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/8131721/8131772/Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi-Commission-report.pdf [accessed August 10, 2025].
  42. Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study. – Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  43. Use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Options Appraisal of Economic Cases. (2024). Internet access: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/green-book-supplementary-guidance-multi-criteria-decision-analysis/use-of-multi-criteria-decision-analysis-in-options-appraisal-of-economic-cases [accessed July 10, 2025].
  44. Yoon, K. P., Hwang, C. L. (1995). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction. – SAGE Publications. doi:10.4135/9781412985161. n3
  45. Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, K. (2011). Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods in Economics: An Overview // Technological and Economic Development of Economy. Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 397–427. doi: 10.3846/20294913.2011.593291.
  46. Zeleny, M. (1982). Multiple Criteria Decision Making. – McGraw-Hill.
  47. Zsolnai, L. (2013). The Importance of Meta-economics / In Responsible Economics. E. F. Schumacher and his legacy for the 21st century, ed. H. Opdebeeck. – Oxford: P Lang Academic Publishing.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mosr-2025-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2335-8750 | Journal ISSN: 1392-1142
Language: English
Page range: 33 - 65
Submitted on: Aug 27, 2025
|
Accepted on: Dec 30, 2025
|
Published on: Apr 1, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2026 Antanas Buračas, published by Vytautas Magnus University, Faculty of Economics and Management
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.