Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Degree of deterioration of the chemical composition of apricot fruits caused by Sharka disease Cover

Figures & Tables

Tab. 1:

Weather conditions of the Čačak region (Western Serbia) for 2023 and 2024*

MonthsAverage monthly air temperature (°C)Total precipitation (mm)
20232024LTA20232024LTA
Jan3.42.00.0390.056.044.1
Feb3.39.02.337.27.838.9
Mar7.510.06.865.049.646.2
Apr11.713.911.56.648.251.6
May16.215.916.820.092.472.7
June19.422.120.0140.861.487.3
July23.124.821.588.058.879.1
Aug21.925.321.249.618.458.0
Sep19.518.016.775.286.056.2
Oct15.112.911.411.837.051.1
Nov7.14.76.0134.666.855.9
Dec5.52.51.430.266.850.4
Mean or total12.813.411.3749.0649.2690.2

* Source: Republic Hydro-meteorological Bureau in Belgrade, Serbia (http://www.hidmet.gov.rs) LTA: normal refers to the long-term average (45-year average, i.e. 1965–2010 period)

Fig. 1:

Typical symptomatic fruits on a PPV-M-infected apricot cultivar ‘Precoce de Thyrinte’ tree in Prislonica village near Čačak city, Serbia (photo taken in mid-June 2024 by T. Milošević).

Tab. 2:

Impact of Sharka disease on fruit weight of apricot fruits from PPV uninfected and PPV infected trees

Source of variationFruit weight (g)
Viral status (A)
PPV unifected43.20 ± 1.89 a
PPV infected33.42 ± 1.47 b
Year (B)
202339.44 ± 1.97 a
202437.18 ± 1.39 b
ANOVA (F test)
A*
B*
A×Bns

[i] No statistically significant differences between averages by LSD test at P ≤ 0.05 are indicated by the same letter in columns. Asterisks in columns indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 by F test. ns: not significant.

Tab. 3:

Soluble solids content, titratable acidity, pH juice, ripening index and ash content in fruits from PPV uninfected and PPV infected apricot trees

Source of variationSoluble solids content (°Brix)Titratable acidity (%)pH juiceRipening indexAsh (%)
Malic acidCitric acid
Viral status (A)
PPV unifected12.86 ± 0.06 a1.80 ± 0.01 b1.72 ± 0.01 b3.46 ± 0.01 a7.40 ± 0.04 a0.63 ± 0.01 b
PPV infected11.45 ± 0.03 b1.89 ± 0.01 a1.80 ± 0.01 a3.47 ± 0.01 a6.06 ± 0.04 b0.70 ± 0.00 a
Year (B)
202312.66 ± 0.03 a1.68 ± 0.00 b1.61 ± 0.00 b3.50 ± 0.01 a7.67 ± 0.02 a0.72 ± 0.01 a
202411.64 ± 0.06 b2.01 ± 0.01 a1.92 ± 0.01 a3.42 ± 0.01 b5.78 ± 0.06 b0.62 ± 0.00 b
ANOVA (F test)
A***ns**
B******
A×B******

[i] No statistically significant differences between averages by LSD test at P ≤ 0.05 are indicated by the same letter in columns. Asterisks in columns indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 by F test. ns: not significant.

Tab. 4:

Impact of Sharka disease on sugar contents and sweetness index in apricot fruits

Source of variationInvert sugars (%)Reducing sugars (%)Sucrose (%)Total sugars (%)Sweetness index
Viral status (A)
PPV unifected7.99 ± 0.09 a1.81 ± 0.02 a7.59 ± 0.01 a9.80 ± 0.01 a5.60 ± 0.01 a
PPV infected7.62 ± 0.01 b0.81 ± 0.01 b7.24 ± 0.01 b8.46 ± 0.01 b4.50 ± 0.05 b
Year (B)
20237.92 ± 0.01 a1.10 ± 0.01 b7.53 ± 0.01 a9.02 ± 0.01 b5.49 ± 0.01 a
20247.68 ± 0.02 b1.52 ± 0.01 a7.30 ± 0.01 b9.23 ± 0.02 a4.62 ± 0.05 b
ANOVA (F test)
A*****
B*****
A×B*****

[i] No statistically significant differences between averages by LSD test at P ≤ 0.05 are indicated by the same letter in columns. Asterisks in columns indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 by F test.

Tab. 5:

Content of chlorophyll and total carotenoids in apricot fruit

Source of variationChlorophyll a (μg 100 g‒1)Chlorophyll b (μg 100 g‒1)Total chlorophyll (a + b) (μg 100 g‒1)Total carotenoids (μg 100 g‒1)
Viral status (A)
PPV unifected172.88 ± 0.72 a78.04 ± 2.49 a250.92 ± 2.92 a939.49 ± 4.36 a
PPV infected92.53 ± 0.65 b68.11 ± 2.55 b160.64 ± 2.13 b775.03 ± 2.67 b
Year (B)
2023166.97 ± 0.85 a35.00 ± 1.77 b201.97 ± 1.90 a846.17 ± 3.69 b
202498.44 ± 0.52 b111.16 ± 3.26 a209.59 ± 3.15 a868.35 ± 3.34 a
ANOVA (F test)
A****
B****
A×B****

[i] No statistically significant differences between averages by LSD test at P ≤ 0.05 are indicated by the same letter in columns. Asterisks in columns indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 by F test.

Tab. 6:

Content of total phenolics and total flavonoids in apricot fruit and their antioxidant capacity

Source of variationTotal phenolic content (mg 100 g‒1)Total flavonoid content (mg 100 g‒1)Total antioxidant capacity (mmol 100 g‒1)
Viral status (A)
PPV unifected26.19 ± 0.34 a7.24 ± 0.12 a0.35 ± 0.01 a
PPV infected22.13 ± 0.18 b4.93 ± 0.11 b0.35 ± 0.00 a
Year (B)
202325.87 ± 0.25 a7.04 ± 0.11 a0.36 ± 0.01 a
202422.46 ± 0.27 b5.12 ± 0.12 b0.34 ± 0.00 b
ANOVA (F test)
A**ns
B***
A×B***

[i] No statistically significant differences between averages by LSD test at P ≤ 0.05 are indicated by the same letter in columns. Asterisks in columns indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 by F test.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mittklbg-2025-0004 | Journal eISSN: 3061-063X (formerly 0007-5922) | Journal ISSN: 3061-0621
Language: English, German
Page range: 45 - 56
Submitted on: Mar 13, 2025
Published on: Jul 11, 2025
Published by: High School and Federal Office of Viticulture and Pomology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Tomo Milošević, Nebojša Milošević, Nemanja Miletić, Vesna Matejić, Darko Jevremović, Ivan Glišić, Radmila Ilić, Gorica Paunović, published by High School and Federal Office of Viticulture and Pomology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.