Have a personal or library account? Click to login
How New Digital-Based Service Offers Change Consumer Practices: A Theory of Social Practise (TSP) Approach Cover

How New Digital-Based Service Offers Change Consumer Practices: A Theory of Social Practise (TSP) Approach

Open Access
|Jun 2024

References

  1. Akaka, M. A., Schau, H. J., & Vargo, S. L. (2021). Practice Diffusion. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(6), 939–969. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucab045
  2. Autorent. (2020). Impact of technology on car rental industry. Retrieved October 27, 2023, from https://autorent-me.com/blog-info/impact-of-technology-on-car-rental-industry
  3. Bezerra, B., dos Santos, A. L., & Delmonico, D. V. B. (2020). Unfolding barriers for urban mobility plan in small and medium municipalities – A case study in Brazil. Transportation Research Part A, 132, 808–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.12.006
  4. Castelo, A. F. M., Schäfer, M., & Silva, M. E. (2021). Food practices as part of daily routines: A conceptual framework for analysing networks of practices. Appetite, 157, 104978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104978
  5. Chen, T. D., & Kockelman, K. M. (2016). Carsharing’s life-cycle impacts on energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 47, 276–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.05.012
  6. Christensen, T. H., Friis, F., Freudendal-Pedersen, M., Grindsted, T. S., & Hartmann-Petersen, K. (2019). Analytical Framework on Everyday Mobility Practices and Guidelines for Interventions. Retrieved March 6, 2022, from https://www.sims.aau.dk/digitalAssets/640/640973_deliverable-d1_analytical-freamework_final.pdf
  7. Echeverri, P., & Skålén, P. (2011). Co-creation and co-destruction: A practice-theory based study of interactive value formation. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593111408181
  8. Farag, S. & Lyons G. (2010). Explaining public transport information use when a car is available: attitude theory empirically investigated. Transportation, 37 (6), 897–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-010-9265-1
  9. Grönroos, Ch., Strandvik, T. & Heinonen, K. (2015). Value co-creation. Critical Reflections. In: The Nordic School - Service Marketing and Management for the Future (ed Gummerus J, von Koskull C) CERS, Hanken School of Economics, 69–82. https://helda.helsinki.fi/server/api/core/bitstreams/e6e0208e-8208-4095-aa7b-ada6252479ba/content
  10. Hargreaves, T. (2011). Practiceing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(1), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540510390500
  11. Hebrok, M., & Heidenstrøm, N. (2019). Contextualising food waste prevention ‒ Decisive moments within everyday practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 1435–1448. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.141
  12. Heidenstrøm, N. (2021). The utility of social practice theory in risk research. Journal of Risk Research, 25(2), 236–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2021.1936608
  13. Hietanen, S. (2014). Mobility as a service: The new transport model? Eurotransport (ITS & Transport Management Supplement), 12(2), 2–4.
  14. Holt, D. (2012). Constructing sustainable consumption: From ethical values to cultural transformation of unsustainable markets. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212453260
  15. Holtz, G. (2014). Generating social practices. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 17(1). Retrieved March 6, 2022, from https://www.jasss.org/17/1/17.html. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.2333
  16. Luckman, J. & Hegene, M. (2013). Lean Transformational Leadership Program Will Change How You Lead [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P55BzDLCfzA
  17. Lyons, G. (2018). Getting smart about urban mobility – aligning the paradigms of smart and sustainable. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 115, 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.12.001
  18. Magaudda, P. (2011). When materiality ‘bites back’: Digital music consumption practices in the age of dematerialization. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(1), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540510390499
  19. Matyas, M., & Kamargianni, M. (2019). The potential of mobility as a service bundles as a mobility management tool. Transportation, 46, 1951–1968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9913-4
  20. Medberg, G., & Heinonen, K. (2014). Invisible value formation: A netnography in retail banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 32(6), 590–607. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-03-2014-0041
  21. Morgan, D. L., & Nica, A. (2020). Iterative Thematic Inquiry: A New Method for Analyzing Qualitative Data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 160940692095511. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920955118
  22. Mylan, J. (2015). Understanding the diffusion of Sustainable Product-Service Systems. Insights from the sociology of consumption and practice theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 97, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.065
  23. Mylan, J., Holmes, H., & Paddock, J. (2016). Re-introducing consumption to the ‘Circular Economy’: A sociotechnical analysis of domestic food provisioning. Sustainability, 8(8), 794. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080794
  24. Norman, D.A. & Verganti, R. (2014). Incremental and Radical Innovation: Design Research vs. Technology and Meaning Change. Design Issues, 30(1), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00250.
  25. Paddock, J. (2017). Household consumption and environmental change: Rethinking the policy problem through narratives of food practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 17(1), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540515586869
  26. Papa, E., & Lauwers, D. (2015). Smart mobility: Opportunity or threat to innovate places and cities? In 20th International Conference on Urban Planning and Regional Development in the Information Society (pp. 543–550). REAL CORP.
  27. Reckwitz, A. (2002a). The Status of the “Material” in Theories of Culture: From “Social Structure” to “Artefacts”. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 32(2), 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00183
  28. Reckwitz, A. (2002b). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432
  29. Shove, E., & Pantzar, M. (2005). Consumers, producers and practices: Understanding the invention and reinvention of Nordic walking. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540505049846
  30. Shove, E., & Walker, G. (2010). Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life. Research Policy, 39(4), 471–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.019
  31. Shove, E., Watson, M., & Spurling, N. (2015). Conceptualising Connections: Energy Demand, Infrastructures and Social Practices. European Journal of Social Theory, 18(3), 274–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431015579964
  32. Sinek, S. (2010, May 4). How great leaders inspire action | Simon Sinek | TED [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qp0HIF3SfI4
  33. Smagacz-Poziemska, M., Bukowski, A., & Martini, N. (2020). Social practice research in practice. Some methodological challenges in applying practice-based approach to urban research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1760577
  34. Spotswood, F., Chatterton, T., Tapp, A., & Williams, D. (2015). Analysing cycling as a social practice: An empirical grounding for behaviour change. Transportation Research Part F, 29, 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.12.001
  35. Spurling, N., McMeekin, A., Southerton, D., Shove, E., & Welch, D. (2013). Interventions in practice: Reframing policy approaches to consumer behaviour. Retrieved August 14, 2021, from http://www.sprg.ac.uk/uploads/sprg-report-sept-2013.pdf
  36. TfL. (2017). Healthy Streets. Retrieved November 24, 2020, from http://content.tfl.gov.uk/healthy-streets-for-london.pdf
  37. Torkkeli, K., Mäkelä, J., & Niva, M. (2018). Elements of practice in the analysis of auto-ethnographical cooking videos. Journal of Consumer Culture, 20(4), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540518764248
  38. Tyrinopoulos, Y., & Antoniou, C. (2013). Factors affecting modal choice in urban mobility. European Transport Research Review, 5(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-012-0088-3
  39. Warde, A. (2005). Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540505053090
  40. Warde, A. (2014). After taste: Culture, consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 14(3), 279–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540514547828
  41. Vargo, S. L., and Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.
  42. Vargo S.L., and Lusch R.F. (2015) Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0456-3
  43. Zeithaml, V. A., Jaworski, B. J., Kohli, A. K., Tuli, K. R., Ulaga, W., & Zaltman, G. (2020). A Theories-in-Use Approach to Building Marketing Theory. Journal of Marketing, 84(1), 32–51.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/minib-2024-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2353-8414 | Journal ISSN: 2353-8503
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 24
Submitted on: Aug 24, 2023
|
Accepted on: Mar 27, 2024
|
Published on: Jun 25, 2024
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Ryszard Kłeczek, Mirosława Pluta-Olearnik, Anetta Pukas, published by ŁUKASIEWICZ RESEARCH NETWORK – INSTITUTE OF AVIATION
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.