Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Educative Experience of the Use of Concept Mapping in Science and Environmental Teacher Training Programmes Cover

Educative Experience of the Use of Concept Mapping in Science and Environmental Teacher Training Programmes

Open Access
|Sep 2014

References

  1. Anderson, O. R., & Demetrius, O. J. (1993). A flow-map method of representing cognitive structure based on respondentís narrative using science content. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(8), 953–969.10.1002/tea.3660300811
  2. Andrews, K. E., Tressier, K. D., & Mintzes, J. J. (2008). Environmental understanding: An application of concept mapping strategy. Environmental Education Research, 14(5), 519–536.10.1080/13504620802278829
  3. Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-94-015-9454-7
  4. Ausubel, D., Novak, J. D., & Hainesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology. A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehan and Winston.
  5. Balgopal, M. M., & Wallace, A. M. (2009). Decisions and dilemmas: Using writing to learn activities to increase ecological literacy. Journal of Environmental Education, 40(3), 13–26.10.3200/JOEE.40.3.13-26
  6. Barney, E. C., Mintzes, J. J., & Yen, C. F. (2005) Assessing knowledge, attitudes and behavior toward charismatic megafauna: The case of dolphins. Journal of Environmental Education, 36(2), 41–55.10.3200/JOEE.36.2.41-55
  7. Beyerbach, B. A. (1988). Developing a technical vocabulary on teacher planning: Preservice teachersí concept maps. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 339–347.10.1016/0742-051X(88)90032-7
  8. Buehl, M., & Fives, H. (2011). Best practices in educational psychology: Using evolving concept maps as instructional and assessment tools. Teaching Educational Psychology, 7(1), 62–87.
  9. Buntting, C., Coll, R., & Campbell, A. (2006). Students views of concept mapping use in introductory tertiary biology classes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(4), 641–668.10.1007/s10763-005-9014-7
  10. Ca–as, A. J. (2004). CmapTools: A knowledge modeling and sharing environment. In A. J. Ca–as, J. D. Novak & F. M. González (Eds.), Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping (pp. 125–133). Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra.
  11. Ca–as, A. J., Hill, G., & Lott, J. (2003). Support for constructing knowledge models in CmapTools. Retrieved May 1, 2014, from http://www.ihmc.us/Publications/
  12. Chiu, C. H., Huang, C., & Chang, W. (2000).The evaluation and influence of interaction in network supported collaborative concept mapping. Computers & Education, 34(1), 17–25.10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00025-1
  13. Daley, B. J., Ca–as, A. J., & Stark, T. (2007). CmapTools: Integrating teaching, learning and evaluation in online courses. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 113, 37–47.10.1002/ace.245
  14. Echarri, F., & Puig, J. (2009). Aprendizaje significativo y Educación Ambiental mediante el programa de software libre CmapTools [Meaningful learning and environmental education with free software CmapTools]. Comunicación y pedagogía: Nuevas tecnologías y recursos didácticos [Communication and Pedagogy: New Technologies and Didactic Resources], 235, 16–20.
  15. Edwards, J., & Fraser, K. (1983). Concept maps as reflections of conceptual understanding. Research in Science Education, 13, 19–26.10.1007/BF02356689
  16. Espinosa, J. M. (2008). La educación ambiental: un modelo de trabajo transversal [Environmental education: A cross-cutting model]. Caleidoscopio: Revista digital de contenidos educativos [Kaleidoscope: Digital Journal of Educational Resources], 1, 84–86.
  17. Fien, J. (1995). Teacher for sustainable world: The environmental and development education project for teacher education. Environmental Education Research, 1(1), 21–3310.1080/1350462950010102
  18. Ged˛°ne, I., & Ged˛°ne, G. (2011). Exploring and promoting ecological consciousness in teacher education: The possibilities of educational action research in education for sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 13(1), 43–61.10.2478/v10099-011-0004-2
  19. Gil Pérez, D., Vilches, A., Edwards, M., Praia, J., Marqués, L., & Oliveira, T. (2003). A proposal to enrich teachersí perception of the state of the world: First results. Environmental Education Research, 9(1), 67–90.10.1080/13504620303465
  20. González, F. (2008). El Mapa conceptual y el Diagrama V. Recursos para la Ense–anza Superior en el siglo XXI [Concept maps and V diagram. Resources for higher education in the 21st century]. Madrid: Narcea.
  21. Guruceaga, A., & González, F. (2004). Aprendizaje significativo y educación ambiental: análisis de los resultados de una práctica fundamentada teóricamente [Meaningful learning and environmental education: Analysis of the results of a theoretical supported practice]. Ense–anza de las Ciencias [Science Education], 22(1), 115–136.
  22. Hargreaves, A. (1998). The emotional practice of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(8), 835–854.10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00025-0
  23. Hicks, D., & Holden, C. (1995). Exploring the future: A missing dimension in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 1(2), 185–193.10.1080/1350462950010205
  24. Ilisko, D. (2007). Teachers as agents of societal change. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 7, 14–26.10.2478/v10099-009-0002-9
  25. Jones, M. G., Carter G., & Rua, M. J. (2000). Exploring the development of conceptual ecologies: Communities of concepts related to convention and heat. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 139–159.10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200002)37:2<139::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-1
  26. Korthagen, F., Loughran, J., & Russell, T. (2006). Developing fundamental principles for teacher education programs and practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(8), 1.020–1.041.10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.022
  27. MacKinnon, G. R., & Aylward, M. L. (2009). Models for building knowledge in a technology-rich setting: Teacher education. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 35(1), 1–7.10.21432/T2388Q
  28. Makrakis, V., Gkotzos, D., & Larios, N. (2012). ICT-enabled climate change education and childrenís rights. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 14(2), 89–110.10.2478/v10099-012-0011-y
  29. Martínez, G., Perez, A. L., Suero, M. I., & Pardo, P. J. (2013).The effectiveness of concept maps in teaching physics concepts applied to engineering education: Experimental comparison of the amount of learning achieved with and without concept maps. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(2), 204–214.10.1007/s10956-012-9386-8
  30. Miller, K. J., Koury, K. A., Fitzgerald, G. E., Hollingsead, C., Mitchem, K. J., Tsai, H. H., & Park, M. K. (2009).Concept mapping as a research tool to evaluate conceptual change related to instructional methods. Teacher Education and Special Education, 32(4), 365–378.10.1177/0888406409346149
  31. Miranda-Correia P. R., Silva, A. C., & Romano-Junior, J. G. (2010). Concept maps as a tool for evaluation in classroom. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física [Brazilian Journal of Physics Education], 32(4), 4402(1)–4402(8).
  32. Moreira, M. A. (1985). Concept mapping: An alternative strategy for evaluation. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 10(2), 159–168.10.1080/0260293850100206
  33. Mosothwane, M. (2002). Pre-service teachersí conceptions of environmental education. Research in Education, 68, 26–40.10.7227/RIE.68.3
  34. Murga-Menoyo, M. A., Bautista, M. J., & Novo, M. (2011). Mapas conceptuales con CmapTools en la ense–anza universitaria de la educación ambiental. Estudio de caso en la UNED [Concept maps with CmapTools in environmental education in higher education. UNED case study]. Ense–anza de las Ciencias [Science Education], 29(1), 47–60.
  35. Nejla, Y., Meryem, S., & Mehmet, Y. (2011). The effect of metaconceptual teaching activities on pre-service biology teachersí conceptual understanding about seed plants. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11(1), 459–464.
  36. Novak, J. D. (1978). A theory of education as a basis for environmental education. In T. S. Bakshi & Z. Naveh (Eds.), Environmental education. Principles, methods and applications (pp. 129–138). Nueva York: Plenum Press.
  37. Novak, J. D., & Ca–as, A. J. (2004). Building on constructivist ideas and CmapTools to create a new model for education. In A. J. Ca–as, J. D. Novak & F. M. Gonzalez (Eds.), Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping (pp. 1–9). Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra.
  38. Novak, J. D., & Ca–as, A. J. (2006).The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct them. Retrieved May 1, 2014, from http://www.ihmc.us/Publications/
  39. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173469
  40. Ojeda, F., Gutiérrez, J., & Perales, F. J. (2009). Qué herramientas proporcionan las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación a la educación ambiental? [What tools do information and communication technologies provide for environmental education?] Revista Eureka sobre Ense–anza y Divulgación de las Ciencias [Eureka Journal on Science Education and Spreading], 6(3), 318–344.10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2009.v6.i3.02
  41. Ospina, A. V. (2012). The outcome of Rio+20: An ICT perspective on the ìFuture we wantî. Retrieved August 23, 2013, from http://niccd.wordpress.com/
  42. Pontes, A. (2012). Representación y comunicación del conocimiento con mapas conceptuales en la formación del profesorado de ciencia y tecnología [Knowledge representation and communication with concept maps in science and technology teacher training]. Revista Eureka sobre Ense–anza y Divulgación de las Ciencias Eureka [Journal on Science Education and Spreading], 9(1), 108–125.
  43. Pontes, A., & Varo, M. (2013). Aprendizaje colaborativo con mapas conceptuales en la formación inicial del profesorado de secundaria [Collaborative learning with concept maps in secondary teachersí training]. In Actas IX Congreso Internacional de Ense–anza de las Ciencias [Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Science Education] (pp. 2826–283). Girona: Universidad de Girona.
  44. Preszler, R. W. (2004). Cooperative concept mapping improves performance in biology. Journal of College Science Teaching, 33, 30–35.
  45. Proctor, J. D., & Bernstein, J. (2013). Environmental connections and concept mapping: Implementing a new learning technology at Lewis & Clark College. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 38(1), 30–41. 10.1007/s13412-013-0109-0
  46. Reitano, P., & Green, N. C. (2012).The value of concept mapping in developing professional growth in a geography methods course. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 6(2), 160–174.10.5172/mra.2012.6.2.160
  47. Schaal, S. (2010). Cognitive and motivational effects of digital concept maps in preservice science teacher training. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 640– 647.10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.077
  48. Stapp, W. B. (1971). An environmental education program (K-12) based on environmental encounters. Environment and Behavior, 3(3), 263–283.10.1177/001391657100300303
  49. Stewart, J. (1980). Techniques for assessing and representing information in cognitive structure. Science Education, 64(2), 223–235.10.1002/sce.3730640212
  50. Stuart, H. A. (1985). Should concept map be scored numerically? European Journal of Science Education, 7(1), 73–81.10.1080/0140528850070108
  51. Tergan, S. O. (2005). Digital concept maps for managing knowledge and information. In Knowledge and information visualization (pp. 185–204). Heidelberg: Springer.
  52. UN (United Nations). (1992). The United Nations conference on environment and development: Agenda 21 Rio Declaration. Paris: UNESCO.
  53. Vanhear, J., & Pace, P. J. (2008). Integrating knowledge, feelings and action: Using Vee heuristics and concept mapping in education for sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 10, 42–55.10.2478/v10099-009-0024-3
  54. Wellie, D. (2002). Making biodiversity meaningful through environmental education. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 1143–1156.10.1080/09500690210134839
  55. Zak, K. M., & Munson, B. H. (2008). An exploratory study of elementary preservice teachersí understanding of ecology using concept maps. Journal of Environmental Education 39(3), 32–46. 10.3200/JOEE.39.3.32-46
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2014-0006 | Journal eISSN: 1691-5534 | Journal ISSN: 1691-4147
Language: English
Page range: 102 - 116
Published on: Sep 12, 2014
Published by: Daugavpils University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2014 Alfonso Pontes-Pedrajas, Marta Varo-Martínez, published by Daugavpils University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.