Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparative metabarcoding study performed on the mock soil nematode communities, composed of DESS-preserved and freshly extracted nematodes Cover

Comparative metabarcoding study performed on the mock soil nematode communities, composed of DESS-preserved and freshly extracted nematodes

Open Access
|May 2026

References

  1. Ahmed, M., Black, M. A., Prior, T., Karssen, G., Lawson, R., Adams, I. and Sapp, M. 2019. Metabarcoding of soil nematodes: The importance of taxonomic coverage and availability of reference sequences in choosing suitable marker(s). Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 3:77–99. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.3.36408
  2. Akanwari, J., Islam, M. R., Liang, P. and Sultana, T. 2025. Metabarcoding-approach-based profiling reveals dynamic nature of sustainable tillage practices on nematode communities in corn-soybean cropping systems. Scientific Reports 15(1):25372. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09356-6
  3. Ali, N., Tavoillot, J., Besnard, G., Khadari, B., Dmowska, E,. Winiszewska, G., Fossati-Gaschignard, O., Ater, M., Aďt Hamza, M., El, Mousadik, A., El Oualkadi, A., Moukhli, A., Essalouh, L., El Bakkali, A., Chapuis, E. and Mateille, T. 2017. How anthropogenic changes may affect soil-borne parasite diversity? Plant-parasitic nematode communities associated with olive trees in Morocco as a case study. BMC Ecology 17:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-016-0113-9
  4. Bezerra, T. N., Deprez, T., Eisendle, U., Hodda, M., Holovachov, O., Leduc, D., Mokievsky, V., Peña Santiago, R., Pérez-García, J. A., Sharma, J., Smol, N., Tchesunov, A., Vanreusel, A., Venekey, V., Zhao, Z. Nemys, World Database of Nematodes. In Bánki, O., Roskov, Y., Döring, M., Ower, G., Vandepitte, L., Hobern, D., Remsen, D., Schalk, P., DeWalt, R. E., Keping, M., Miller, J., Orrell, T., Aalbu, R., Abbott, J., Adlard, R., Adriaenssens, E. M., Aedo, C., Aescht, E., Akkari, N. et al. 2023. Catalogue of Life Checklist (ver. (01/2023)). https://doi.org/10.48580/dfqz-4rf
  5. Bird, G. W., Brooks, O. L. and Perry, C. E. 1974. Dynamics of concomitant field populations of Hoplolaimus columbus and Meloidogyne incognita. Journal of Nematology 6(4):190–194.
  6. Carini, P., Marsden, P., Leff, J., Morgan, E. E., Strickland, M. S. and Fierer, N. 2017. Relic DNA is abundant in soil and obscures estimates of soil microbial diversity. Nature Microbiology 2:16242. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.242
  7. Chombard, C., Boury-Esnault, N. and Tillier, S. 1998. Reassessment of homology of morphological characters in tetractinellid sponges based on molecular data. Systematic Biology 47(3):351–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/106351598260761
  8. Darby, B. J., Todd, T. C. and Herman, M. A. 2013. High-throughput amplicon sequencing of rRNA genes requires a copy number correction to accurately reflect the effects of management practices on soil nematode community structure. Molecular Ecology 22:5456–5471. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12480
  9. Dobosz, R., Rybarczyk-Mydłowska, K. and Winiszewska, G. 2020. Occurrence of Ditylenchus destructor Thorne, 1945 on a sand dune of the Baltic Sea. Journal of Plant Protection Research 60(1):31–40. https://journals.pan.pl/dlibra/publication/132206/edition/115499/content
  10. Donn, S., Neilson, R., Griffiths, B. S. and Daniell, T. J. 2012. A novel molecular approach for rapid assessment of soil nematode assemblages – variation, validation and potential applications. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3:12–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00145.x
  11. Drake, L. E., Cuff, J. P., Young, R. E., Marchbank, A., Chadwick, E. A., Symondson, W. O. C. 2022. An assessment of minimum sequence copy thresholds for identifying and reducing the prevalence of artefacts in dietary metabarcoding data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 13:694–710. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13780
  12. Edgar, R. C. 2010. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26:2460–2461. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461
  13. Edgar, R. C. 2016. UNOISE2: Improved error-correction for Illumina 16S and ITS amplicon sequencing. BioRxiv 81257. https://doi.org/10.1101/081257
  14. Ficetola, G. F., Guerrieri, A., Cantera, I. and Bonin, A. 2024. In silico assessment of 18S rDNA metabarcoding markers for the characterization of nematode communities. PLoS One 19(4):e0298905. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298905
  15. Geisen, S., Snoek, L. B., ten Hooven, F. C., Duyts, H., Kostenko, O., Bloem, J., Martens, H., Quist, C. W., Helder J. A. and van der Putten, W. H. 2018. Integrating quantitative morphological and qualitative molecular methods to analyse soil nematode community responses to plant range expansion. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9:1366–1378. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12999
  16. Gendron, E. M., Sevigny, J. L, Byiringiro, I., Thomas, W. K., Powers, T. O. and Porazinska, D. L. 2023. Nematode mitochondrial metagenomics: A new tool for biodiversity analysis. Molecular Ecology Resources 23(5):975–989. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13761
  17. Griffiths, B. S., de Groot G. A., Laros, I., Stone, D. and Geisen, S. 2018. The need for standardisation: Exemplified by a description of the diversity, community structure and ecological indices of soil nematodes. Ecological Indicators 87:43–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.002
  18. Hayden, H. L., Ghaderi, R., Trollip, C., Hu, H-W. and He, J-Z. 2025. Advancing the use of metabarcoding derived nematode-based indices as soil health bioindicators in agricultural and natural environments. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 205:109772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109772
  19. Hilário, H. O., Mendes, I. S., Guimarães Sales, N. and Carvalho, D. C. 2023. DNA metabarcoding of mock communities highlights potential biases when assessing Neotropical fish diversity. Environmental DNA, 5:1351–1361. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.456
  20. Holterman, M., Rybarczyk, K., Elsen, S. van den, Megen, H. van, Mooyman, P., Santiago, R. P., Bongers, T., Bakker, J. and Helder, J. 2008. A ribosomal DNA-based framework for the detection and quantification of stress-sensitive nematode families in terrestrial habitats. Molecular Ecology Resources, 8(1):23–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01963.x
  21. Holterman, M., van der Wurff, A., van den Elsen, S., van Megen, H., Bongers, T., Holovachov, O., Bakker, J. and Helder, J. 2006. Phylum-wide analysis of SSU rDNA reveals deep phylogenetic relationships among nematodes and accelerated evolution toward crown clades. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23:1792–1800. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msl044
  22. Kawanobe, M., Toyota, K. and Ritz, K. 2021. Development and application of a DNA metabarcoding method for comprehensive analysis of soil nematode communities. Applied Soil Ecology 166:103974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.103974.
  23. Macheriotou, L., Guilini, K., Bezerra, T. N., Tytgat, B., Nguyen, D. T., Phuong Nguyen, T. X., Noppe, F., Armenteros, M., Boufahja, F., Rigaux, A., Vanreusel, A. and Derycke, S. 2019. Metabarcoding free-living marine nematodes using curated 18S and CO1 reference sequence databases for species-level taxonomic assignments. Ecolology and Evolution 9(3):1211–1226. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4814
  24. McMurdie, P. J. and Holmes, S. 2013. phyloseq: An R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 8:61217. http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061217
  25. Nunn, G. B. 1992. Nematode molecular evolution: An investigation of evolutionary patterns among nematodes based upon DNA sequences. Nottingham, UK: Dissertation, University of Nottingham.
  26. Okada, H. and Oba, H. 2008. Comparison of nematode community similarities assessed by polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and by morphological identification. Nematology 10(5):689–700.
  27. Peham, T., Steiner, F. M., Schlick-Steiner, B. C. and Arthofer, W. 2017. Are we ready to detect nematode diversity by next generation sequencing? Ecology and Evolution 7:4147–4151. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2998
  28. Porazinska, D. L., Giblin-Davis, R. M., Faller, L., Farmerie, W., Kanzaki, N., Morris, K., Powers, T. O., Tucker, A. E., Sung, W. and Thomas, W. K. 2009. Evaluating high-throughput sequencing as a method for metagenomics analysis of nematode diversity. Molecular Ecology Resources 9:1439–1450. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02611.x
  29. Porazinska, D. L., Giblin-Davis, R. M., Sung, W. and Thomas, W. K. 2010. Linking operational clustered taxonomic units (OCTUs) from parallel ultra sequencing (PUS) to nematode species. Zootaxa 2427:55–63. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2427.1.6
  30. Posit team. 2024. RStudio: Integrated development environment for R. Boston, MA: Posit Software, PBC. URL http://www.posit.co/
  31. R Core Team. 2023. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
  32. Ren, Y., Porazinska, D. L., Ma, Q., Liu, S., Li, H. and Qing, X. 2024. A single degenerated primer significantly improves COX1 barcoding performance in soil nematode community profiling. Soil Ecology Letters 6:230204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42832-023-0204-4
  33. Ritz, K. and Trudgill, D. L. 1999. Utility of nematode community analysis as an integrated measure of the functional state of soils: Perspectives and challenges. Plant Soil 212:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004673027625
  34. Rodriguez-Martinez, S., Klaminder, J., Morlock, M. A., Dalén, L. and Huang, D.-T. 2023. The topological nature of tag jumping in environmental DNA metabarcoding studies. Molecular Ecology Resources, 23:621–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13745
  35. Rybarczyk-Mydłowska, K., Mooyman, P., van Megen, H., van den Elsen, S., Vervoort, M., Veenhuizen, P., van Doorn, J., Dees, R., Karssen, G., Bakker, J. and Helder, J. 2012. Small subunit ribosomal DNA-based phylogenetic analysis of foliar nematodes (Aphelenchoides spp.) and their quantitative detection in complex DNA backgrounds. Phytopathology 102(12):1153–1160
  36. Rybarczyk-Mydłowska, K., Sikora, G. and Kubicz, M. 2022. Morphological and molecular characteristics of Geocenamus longus and the first report of G. brevidens from a karst cave (Nematoda: Merliniidae Siddiqi, 1971). Zootaxa 5134(3):383–398. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5134.3.3
  37. Sapkota, R. and Nicolaisen, M, 2015. High-throughput sequencing of nematode communities from total soil DNA-extractions. BMC Ecology 15:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-014-0034-4
  38. Seinhorst, J. W. 1959. A rapid method for the transfer of nematodes from fixative to anhydrous glycerin. Nematologica 4:67–69. https://doi.org/10.1163/187529259X00381
  39. Sikder, M. M., Vestergård, M., Sapkota, R., Kyndt, T. and Nicolaisen, M. 2020. Evaluation of metabarcoding primers for analysis of soil nematode communities. Diversity 12(10):388. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12100388
  40. Singh, P. R,. van de Vossenberg B., Rybarczyk-Mydłowska, K., Kowalewska-Groszkowska, M., Bert, W. and Karssen, G. 2022. An integrated approach for synonymization of Rotylenchus rhomboides with R. goodeyi (Nematoda: Hoplolaimidae) reveals high intraspecific mitogenomic variation. Phytopathology 112(5):1152–1164. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-08-21-0363-R
  41. Thornton, C. and Matlack, G. 2002. Long-term disturbance effects in the nematode communities of South Mississippi Woodlands. Journal of Nematol 34(2):88–97.
  42. Treonis, A. M., Unangst, S. K., Kepler, R. M., Buyer, J. S., Cavigelli, M. A., Mirsky, S. B. and Maul, J. E. 2018. Characterization of soil nematode communities in three cropping systems through morphological and DNA metabarcoding approaches. Scientific Reports 8:2004. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20366-5
  43. van Bezooijen, J. 2006. Methods and techniques for nematology. The Netherlands: The Nematology Department Manual, Wageningen University.
  44. van der Loos, L. M. and Nijland, R. 2021. Biases in bulk: DNA metabarcoding of marine communities and the methodology involved. Molecular Ecology 30(13):3270–3288. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15592
  45. Vervoort, M. T. W., Vonk, J. A., Mooijman, P. J. W., van den Elsen, S. J. J., van Megen H. H. B., Veenhuizen, P., Landeweert, R., Bakker, J., Mulder, C. and Helder, J. 2012. SSU ribosomal DNA based monitoring of nematode assemblages reveals distinct seasonal fluctuations within evolutionary heterogeneous feeding guilds. PLoS One 7(10):e47555. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047555
  46. Waeyenberge, L., de Sutter, N., Viaene, N. and Haegeman, A. 2019. New insights into nematode DNA-metabarcoding as revealed by the characterization of artificial and spiked nematode communities. Diversity 11(4):52. https://doi.org/10.3390/d11040052
  47. Wheeler, B. and Torchiano, M. 2025. lmPerm: Permutation tests for linear models. R package version 2.1.4 https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmPerm
  48. Wickham, H. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. P. 2016 New York: Springer-Verlag. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org
  49. Yoder, M., De Ley, I. T., Wm King, I., Mundo-Ocampo, M., Mann, J., Blaxter, M., Poiras, L. and De Ley, P. 2006. DESS: A versatile solution for preserving morphology and extractable DNA of nematodes. Nematology 8(3):367–376. https://doi.org/10.1163/156854106778493448
  50. Zapałowska, A., Skwiercz, A., Tereba, A., Puchalski, C. and Malewski, T. 2023. Next-generation Sequencing for evaluating the soil nematode diversity and its role in composting processes. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 24:15749. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242115749
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2026-0014 | Journal eISSN: 2640-396X | Journal ISSN: 0022-300X
Language: English
Page range: 165 - 185
Submitted on: Aug 5, 2025
Accepted on: Apr 8, 2026
Published on: May 16, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Katarzyna Rybarczyk-Mydłowska, Mohammed Ahmed, Grażyna Winiszewska, published by Society of Nematologists, Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.