References
- Ainsworth, S. (2015). Aging entrepreneurs and volunteers: Transition in late career. In P. Bal, D. Kooij, & D. Rousseau (Eds.), Aging workers and the employee-employer relationship. Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-08007-9_14.
- Alfageme, A. (2020). Żyć i nie umierać w Finlandii. Na czym polega sekret najszczęśliwszego kraju świata? [EL PAIS]. https://wyborcza.pl/7,75399,25654468,szczesliwy-jak-fin.html.
- Alpaslan, B., & Çelik, S. (2023). Industry 5.0 and National Development Plans. The Eurasia Proceedings of Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics, 24, 149–157. doi: 10.55549/epstem.1406267.
- Barataa, J., & Kayserb, I. (2022). Industry 5.0 – Past, Present, and Near Future, CENTERIS – International Conference on ENTERprise Information Systems/ProjMAN – International Conference on Project MANagement/HCist – International Conference on Health and Social Care Information Systems and Technologies (pp. 778–788). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050923003605.
- Blid, L. (2018). Senior entrepreneurship – key facts at regional level in Romania. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Business Excellence 2018 (pp. 139–150). doi: 10.2478/picbe-2018-0014. https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/picbe/12/1/article-p139.xml.
- Breque, M., De Nul, L., & Petridis, A. (2021). Industry 5.0 Towards a sustainable, human-centric and resilient European industry. European Commission Directorate – General for Research and Innovation. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/468a892a-5097-11eb-b59f-01aa75ed71a1/.
- Bąk, A. (2016). Porządkowanie liniowe obiektów metodą Hellwiga i TOPSIS – analiza porównawcza. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, (426), 22–31. https://www.dbc.wroc.pl/Content/33121/Bak_Porzadkowanie_Liniowe_Obiektow_Metoda_Hellwiga_i_Topsis_2016.pdf.
- CSO (Główny Urząd Statystyczny). (2022). Wskaźniki społeczeństwa informacyjnego. Badania wykorzystania technologii informacyjno-komunikacyjnych. https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/nauka-i-technika-spoleczenstwo-informacyjne/spoleczenstwo-informacyjne/zeszyt-metodologiczny-wskazniki-spoleczenstwa-informacyjnego-badania-wykorzystania-technologii-informacyjno-komunikacyjnych,8,2.html.
- Czekanowski, P. (2012). Społeczne aspekty starzenia się ludności w Polsce. Perspektywa socjologii starości. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
- De Hoyos Guevara, A. J., Terra, D. M., Portes, J. H., Magalhães, K. E., & da Silva, J. L. A. (2021). A ranking of countries concerning progress towards a society 5.0. Journal on Innovation and Sustainability RISUS, 11(4), 188–199. doi: 10.23925/2179-3565.2020v11i4p188-199.
- Domonkost, T., Horvát, P, Hvozdíková, V., Lichner, I., Miklošovič, T., Páleník, V., Radvanský, M., & Štefánik, M. (2013). Modelling the economic potential of the silver economy. NEUJOBS WORKING PAPER, 12(3), 1–65. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.25400.42243.
- Enste, P., Naegele, G., & Leve, V. (2008). The discovery and development of the silver market in Germany. In F. Kohlbacher & C. Herstatt (Eds.), The Silver Market Phenomenon. Business Opportunities in an Era of Demographic Change (pp. 330–331). Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-75331-5.
- European Commission. (2018). Silver Economy – Final Report, Technopolis Group – Oxford Economics, European Union (pp. 1–58). https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/a9efa929-3ec7-11e8-b5fe-01aa75ed71a1.
- Finland. (n.d.). Finlandia – informacyjne państwo dobrobytu, retrieved May 15, 2024 from https://ideologia.pl/finlandia-informacyjne-panstwo-dobrobytu/.
- Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Mubarak, M. F., Mubarik, M., Rejeb, A., & Nilashi, M. (2022). Identifying industry 5.0 contributions to sustainable development: A strategy roadmap for delivering sustainability values. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 33, 716–737. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2022.08.003.
- Gladden, M. E. (2019). Who will be the members of society 5.0? Towards an anthropology of technologically posthumanized future societies. Social Science, 8(5), 1–39.
- Golovianko, M., Terziyan, V., Branytskyi, V., & Malyk, D. (2023). Industry 4.0 vs. Industry 5.0: Co-existence, transition, or a hybrid. Procedia Computer Science, 217, 102–113. doi: 10.1016/J.PROCS.2022.12.206.
- Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., Sachs, J. D., De Neve, J.-E., Aknin, L. B., & Wang, S. (Eds.). (2024). World Happiness Report 2024. Wellbeing Research Centre, University of Oxford. https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2024/.
- Kawa, M., Kisiel, M., & Grzybek, M. (2017). Wybrane aspekty jakości życia mieszkańców Podkarpacia. Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy, 49, 182–194. doi: 10.15584/nsawg.2017.1.14.
- Kim, A. B. (2023). Index of economic freedom. The Heritage Foundation.
- Kisielińska, J., Borkowski, B., Czech, K., Górska, A., Koszela, G., Krawiec M., Landmesser, J., Ochnio, L., Pietrych, Ł., Pietrzykowski, R., Wsilewska, E., & Zielińska-Sitkiewicz, M. (2021). Wielowymiarowa analiza danych w ekonomice rolnictwa. Wydawnictwo SGGW.
- Klimczuk, A. (2016). Modele “srebrnej gospodarki” w Unii Europejskiej w ujęciu porównawczym: próba wprowadzenia do dyskusji. Problemy Zarzadzania, 14(2), 41–59. doi: 10.7172/1644-9584.59.3.
- Krzyminiewska, G. (2021). The olderpreneur: Future market challenges. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series, 51(51), 75–83. doi: 10.2478/bog-2021-0006.
- Liu, L., Guo, C., Qi, L., Wang, Y., & Shu, R. (2023). Associated factors of participation in digital technology: a study based on older people in China. Innovation in Aging, 7(S1), 991–992. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igad104.3187.
- Mangra, A. M. A. (2023). Seniors and the use of new technologies: Loneliness and support networks. Culture Society Economy Politics, 3(1), 37–49. doi: 10.2478/csep-2023-0003.
- Moody, H. R., & Sasser, J. R. (2012). Ageing: Concepts and controversies. Thousand Oaks.
- Neumann, A. C. (Ed.). (2023). Old Age before Modernity, Case Studies and Methodological Perspectives, 500 BC–1700 AD. Heidelberg University Publishing. doi: 10.17885/heiup.1086.
- Niehaves, B. i Plattfaut, R. (2014). Internet adoption by the elderly: employing IS technology acceptance theories for understanding the age-related digital divide. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(6), 708–726. doi: 10.1057/ejis.2013.19.
- OECD-GCOA. (2014). The silver economy as a pathway for growth. Insights from the OECD-GCOA Expert Consultation, University of Oxford, Global Coalition for Ageing.
- Palacios, J. F. (2023). The senior economy, an emerging reality. Economics & Insurance, 11, 24–30. https://www.economiayseguromapfre.com/number-11/the-senior-economy-an-emerging-reality/?lang=en.
- Palmore, E. B. (1990). Ageism negative and positive. Springer Publishing.
- Pauhofova, I., & Dovalova, G. (2015). Potential of silver economy in the European Union (selected views). European Scientific Journal, 11(10), 190–205.
- Peacock, S. E., & Künemund, H. (2007). Senior citizens and Internet technology. European Journal of Ageing, 4, 191–200. doi: 10.1007/s10433-007-0067-z.
- Pirhonen, J., Lolich, L., Tuominen, K., Jolanki, O., & Timonen, V. (2020). “These devices have not been made for older people’s needs” – Older adults’ perceptions of digital technologies in Finland and Ireland. Technology in Society, 62, 101287. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101287.
- Prettner, K. (2013). Population aging and endogenous economic growth. Journal of Population Economics, 26, 811–834.
- Radvanský, M., & Páleník, V. (2011). Silver economy as possible export direction at ageing Europe – case of Slovakia. Conference: EcoMod 2011, at: Ponta Delada, Azores, Portugal. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268292079_Silver_economy_as_possible_export_direction_at_ageing_Europe_-_case_of_Slovakia.
- Report. (2012). Global Population Ageing: Peril or Promise?. Global Agenda Council on Ageing Society, World Economic Forum. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GAC_GlobalPopulationAgeing_Report_2012.pdf.
- Report. (2019). Real Opportunities for Adult Online Education. The White Paper. Information Society Development Foundation. https://epale.ec.europa.eu/en/resource-centre/content/real-opportunities-adult-online-education-white-paper.
- Scheerder, A., van Deursen, A., & van Dijk, J. (2017), Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second-and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8), 1607–1624. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007.
- Schoenmaeckers, R. (2005). Population ageing and its economic and financial implication. In R. Schoenmaeckers & I. E. Kotowska (Eds.), Population ageing and its challenges to social policies, population studies (No. 50, pp. 27–95). Council of Europe Publishing.
- Shiroishi, Y., Uchiyama, K., & Suzuki, N. (2019). Better actions for Society 5.0: Using AI or evidence-based policy making that keeps humans in the loop. Computer, 52(11), 73–78.
- van Dijk, J., & Hacker, K. (2003). The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. The Information Society, 19(4), 315–326. doi: 10.1080/01972240309487.
- Walker, A., & Mollenkopf, H. (2007). International and multi-disciplinary perspectives on quality of life in old age: Conceptual issues. In H. Mollenkopf & A. Walker (Eds.), Quality of life in old age, social indicators research series (Vol. 31, pp. 3–14). Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5682-6_1.
- Weber, P., & Schaper, M. (2004). Understanding the grey entrepreneur. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 12(2), 147–164.
- World Health Organization. (1997). Division of Mental Health and Prevention of Substance Abuse. WHOQOL: Measuring quality of life. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/63482.
- World Social Report. (2023). Leaving no one behind in an ageing world. https://desapublications.un.org/publications/world-social-report-2023-leaving-no-one-behind-ageing-world.
- Wu, S. Z., Zhao, Q., Wu, Y., Yang, J., & Huang, X. (2023). Critical array of Society 5.0. FURP, 1(12), 1–9. doi: 10.1007/s44243-023-00019-6.
- Zein, B, Elrashidi, A, Dahlan, M., Jarwan, A., & Jabbour, G. (2024). Nano and Society 5.0: Advancing the human-centric revolution (pp. 1–26). IntechOpen. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.1004221.