Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Fostering factors for perspective taking in students on the Zurich clinical interprofessional training ward ZIPAS®. First Results of the Evaluation / Fördernde Faktoren für die Perspektivenübernahme bei Studierenden auf der Zürcher klinischen interprofessionellen Ausbildungsstation ZIPAS®. Erste Ergebnisse der Evaluation Cover

Fostering factors for perspective taking in students on the Zurich clinical interprofessional training ward ZIPAS®. First Results of the Evaluation / Fördernde Faktoren für die Perspektivenübernahme bei Studierenden auf der Zürcher klinischen interprofessionellen Ausbildungsstation ZIPAS®. Erste Ergebnisse der Evaluation

Open Access
|Nov 2024

Figures & Tables

Figure 1:

Professions in ZIPAS®-project, own design.
Professions in ZIPAS®-project, own design.

Figure 2:

Code-relations model, Visual Tools MAXQDA, 2024.Note. The strength of the line is in relation to the frequency of the relationships.
Code-relations model, Visual Tools MAXQDA, 2024.Note. The strength of the line is in relation to the frequency of the relationships.

Figure 3:

Word-cloud Fostering factors, own design.Note. The font size represents the relative frequency of mentions of a term, colors are irrelevant.
Word-cloud Fostering factors, own design.Note. The font size represents the relative frequency of mentions of a term, colors are irrelevant.

Figure 4:

Word-cloud Hindering factors, own design.Note. The font size represents the relative frequency of mentions of a term, colors are irrelevant.
Word-cloud Hindering factors, own design.Note. The font size represents the relative frequency of mentions of a term, colors are irrelevant.

Categories with subcodes, own design_

Categories
Successful IPCLack of IP interaction
Successful IPEHindering factors

    Benefits

  • Perspective taking

    • Getting to know the competences of others

    • Work shadowing

    • Thinking for and with others

    • Helpfulness

    • Understanding others

Enabling factors
Quality of careProfession-specific delimination

Phases of thematic analysis_

PhaseTitle of PhaseContent of Phase
1Familiarization with dataTranscribe and thoroughly review all interviews, identifying the initial key topics that emerge.
2Generating codesSystematically code documents, assigning primary codes and subcodes where necessary. Create code segments encompassing all potential themes.
3Searching themesOrganize codes into broader themes, considering relationships between themes, codes, and different levels of thematic hierarchy.
4Reviewing themesExamine the functionality of themes in relation to codes and the entire dataset. Review and refine the analysis, recoding any missed data within themes. Develop a thematic map
5Defining and naming themesConduct a detailed analysis of each theme, establishing coherent definitions and names for each. Explore how each theme contributes to the overall narrative.
6Producing reportSelect statements from themes that capture their essence. Relate themes to the research question and existing literature, producing report for dissemination.
Language: English, German
Page range: 99 - 109
Submitted on: Jan 30, 2024
Accepted on: Aug 20, 2024
Published on: Nov 20, 2024
Published by: ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Trüb Moira, Kucera Anja, Schwärzler Patricia, Kerry-Krause Matthew, Stamm David, Huber Marion, published by ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.