Functional transposition of  TILL and UNTIL from a diachronic perspective

Yurii Kovbasko

doi:10.2478/exell-2023-0001

Abstract

The research traces the development of functional transposition of TILL and UNTIL in English. The study covers 16 historical periods and is based on 1,243 examples extracted from the writings from 850 to 1710, which are analyzed without resorting to any corpus software; 2,225 examples from 1710 to 1920, which are automatically tagged utilizing the corpus toolbox Lancsbox; and the statistical data on 127,544 examples over the period of 1920–2020. It is hypothesized that despite being synonyms and representatives of the same grammatical categories of prepositions and conjunctions in modern English, the lexical units TILL and UNTIL were initially formed as prepositions and later, following their own transpositional patterns, they were transposed into conjunctions.

References

Arista, Javier Martin (2019). Another look at old English zero derivation and alternations. Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies 41(1): 163–182.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Baugh, Albert, Thomas Cable (2002). A History of the English Language. London: Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bram, Barli (2011). Major Total Conversion in English: The Question of Directionality. PhD thesis. Victoria University of Wellington.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Don, Jan (2005). On conversion, relisting and zero-derivation. A comment on Rochelle Lieber: English word-formation processes. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2: 2–16.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dubinsky, Stanley, Kemp Williams (1995). Recategorization of prepositions as complementizers: The case of temporal prepositions in English. Linguistic Inquiry 26(1): 125–137.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fletcher, John Dexter (2006). Cognitive Readiness: Preparing for the Unexpected. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gadimova, Laila (2021). The cognitive bases of conversion in modern English. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 11(3): 308–313.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Goethem, Kristel Van, Nikos Koutsoukos (2018). “Morphological transposition” as the onset of recategorization: The case of luxe in Dutch. Linguistics 56(6): 1369–1412.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Greenblatt, Stephen, Carol Christ, Alfred David, Barbara Lewalski, & others (2006). The Norton Anthology of English Literature (8th edn). New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Halliday, Michael, Christian Matthiessen (1999). Construing Experience Through Meaning: A Language-based Approach to Cognition. London/New York: Cassell.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hancil, Sylvie (2018). Transcategoriality and right periphery. Hancil, Sylvie, Danh Thanh Do-Hurinville, Huy Linh Dao, eds. Transcategoriality: A Croslinguistic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 61–76.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
He, Qingshun, Bingjun Yang (2014). A Study of transfer directions in grammatical metaphor. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 34(3): 345–360.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hogg, Richard, David Denison (2006). A History of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jespersen, Otto (1924). The Philosophy of Grammar. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jespersen, Otto (1932). A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part IV. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ježek, Elisabetta, Paolo Ramat (2009). On parts-of-speech transcategorization. Folia Linguistica, 43(2): 391–416.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kisselew, Max, Laura Rimell, Alexis Palmer, Sebastian Pado (2016). Predicting the direction of derivation in English Conversion. Proceedings of the 14th Annual SIGMORPHON Workshop on Computational Research in Phonetics, Phonology, and Morphology: 93–98.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kovbasko, Yurii (2022a). Functional transposition of ‘AFTER’ from a diachronic perspective. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture 12: 66–85.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kovbasko, Yurii (2022b). Functional transposition of ‘ON’ from a diachronic perspective. Studies about Languages 40: 75–89.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kovbasko, Yurii (2022c). Procedure of functional transposition analysis in the English language. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 58(1): 59–98.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kruisinga, Etsko (1932). A Handbook of Present-day English. Part 3. Groningen: P. Noordhoff.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kurylowicz, Jerzy (1962). Ocherki po Lingvistike [The Outline on Linguistics]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo inostrannoi literatury.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Li, Bai, Guillaume Thomas, Yang Xu, Frank Rudzicz (2020). Word class flexibility: A deep contextualized approach. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: 983–994.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lipka, Leonhard (1990). An Outline of English Lexicology. Lexical Structure, Word Semantics, and Word-formation. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Orlandini, Anna, Paolo Poccetti (2014). Polyfunctionality and transcategoriality of coordinating particles in Latin and in other ancient languages. Journal of Latin Linguistics 13(2): 267–278.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ramat, Paolo (2019). The limits of transcategorization. Incontri Linguistici 42: 155–169.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Robert, Stephane (2003). Vers une typologie de la transcatégorialité. Robert, Stephanie, ed. Perspectives Synchroniques sur la Grammaticalisation: Polysémie, Transcatégorialité et Échelles Syntaxiques. Louvain: Editions Peeters, 255–270.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Robert, Stephane (2005). The challenge of polygrammaticalization for linguistic theory: fractal grammar and transcategorial functioning. Frajzyngier, Zygmunt, Adam Hodges, David S. Rood, eds. Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 119–142.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sanders, Gerald (1988). Zero derivation and the overt analogue criterion. Hammond, Michael, Michael Noonan, eds. Theoretical Morphology. Approaches in Modern Linguistics. San Diego: Academic Press, 155–175.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sheffield, Alfred Dwight (1912). Grammar and Thinking: A Study of the Working Conceptions in Syntax. New York/London: G. P. Putnam’s sons.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Štekauer, Pavol (2005). Onomasiological approach to word-formation. Štekauer, Pavol, Rochelle Lieber, eds. Handbook of Word Formation. New York: Springer, 207–232.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sternina, Maria (2014). Сопоставительно-параметрический метод лингвистических исследований. [Comparative-parametric method of linguistic research]. Voronezh: Istoki.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sweet, Henry (1892). A New English Grammar. Logical and Historical. Part 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tesnière, Lucien (1959). Elements de Syntaxe Structurale. Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Toon, Thomas (1992). Old English dialects. Hogg, Richard, ed. The Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. I. The Beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 409-451.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vea, Raquel (2015). Recategorization in the recursive formation of old English nouns and adjectives. RAEL: Revista Electronica de Linguistica Aplicada 1(14): 67–81.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bosworth-Toller Anglo-Saxon Dictionary Online. https://bosworthtoller.com
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hall, John Richard Clark (1916). A Concise Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mayhew, Anthony Lawson, Walter Skeat (1888). A Concise Dictionary of Middle English. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Skeat, Walter (1879). An English-Anglo-Saxon Vocabulary. Cambridge: The University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. https://www.ahdictionary.com
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
The British National Corpus. http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
The Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. https://dictionary.cambridge.org
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
The Collins English Dictionary. https://www.collinsdictionary.com
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
The Corpus of Contemporary American English. https://www.english-corpora.org/coca
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
The Corpus of Historical American English. https://www.english-corpora.org/coha
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
The Corpus of Late Modern English Texts. https://perswww.kuleuven.be/~u0044428/clmet3_0.htm
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
The Helsinki Corpus of English Texts. https://www.helsinkicorpus.arts.gla.ac.uk
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
The Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. https://www.ldoceonline.com
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
The Macmillan English Dictionary. https://www.macmillandictionary.com
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
The Merriam-Webster Dictionary. https://www.merriam-webster.com
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
The Middle English Dictionary. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/middle-english-dictionary
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
The Online Etymology Dictionary. https://www.etymonline.com
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 2009. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Functional transposition of TILL and UNTIL from a diachronic perspective

Abstract

Paradigm

My account