The development of student feedback literacy through peer feedback in the online learning environment
References
- Bıkmaz Bilgen, Ö., & Doğan, N. (2017). The comparison of interrater reliability estimating techniques. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 8(1), 63–78.
- Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Los Angeles, CA, USA: Sage Publications.
- Carless, D. (2022). From teacher transmission of information to student feedback literacy: Activating the learner role in feedback processes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(2), 143–153. doi:10.1177/1469787420945845
- Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
- Cheng, M. W. T., & Chan, C. K. Y. (2019). An experimental test: Using rubrics for reflective writing to develop reflection. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 61, 176–182. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.04.001
- Cheng, K. H., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). Examining the role of feedback messages in undergraduate students’ writing performance during an online peer assessment activity. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 78–84. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.001
- Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2016). Supporting second language writing using multimodal feedback. Foreign Language Annals, 49(1), 58–74. doi:10.1111/flan.12183
- Ene, E., & Upton, T. A. (2018). Synchronous and asynchronous teacher electronic feedback and learner uptake in ESL composition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 41, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2018.05.005
- Er, E., Dimitriadis, Y., & Gašević, D. (2020). A collaborative learning approach to dialogic peer feedback: A theoretical framework. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(4), 586–600. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1786497
- Espasa, A., Guasch, T., Mayordomo, R. M., Martinez-Melo, M., & Carless, D. (2018). A dialogic feedback index measuring key aspects of feedback processes in online learning environments. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(3), 499–513. doi:10.1080/07294360.2018.1430125
- Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.,). London, England: Sage Publications.
- Filius, R. M., de Kleijn, R. A., Uijl, S. G., Prins, F. J., van Rijen, H. V., & Grobbee, D. E. (2018). Strengthening dialogic peer feedback aiming for deep learning in SPOCs. Computers & Education, 125, 86–100. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.004
- Filius, R. M., de Kleijn, R. A., Uijl, S. G., Prins, F. J., van Rijen, H. V., & Grobbee, D. E. (2019). Audio peer feedback to promote deep learning in online education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(5), 607–619. doi:10.1111/jcal.12363
- Foo, S. Y. (2021). Analysing peer feedback in asynchronous online discussions: A case study. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 4553–4572. doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10477-4
- Foster, J. J. (2001). Data analysis using SPSS for Windows versions 8 to 10: A beginner's guide (2nd ed., pp. 222–223). London: Sage Publications.
- Gikandi, J. W., & Morrow, D. (2016). Designing and implementing peer formative feedback within online learning environments. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(2), 153–170. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2015.1058853
- Göktaş, Y. (2016). Öğretim Teknolojilerinde Akademik Yazım - (Academic Writing in Instructional Technology). Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/6268100/%C3%96%C4%9Fretim_Teknolojilerinde_Akademik_Yaz%C4%B1m_Academic_Writing_in_Instructional_Technology_
- Green, S. (2019). What students don’t make of feedback in higher education: An illustrative study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 83–94. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2019.01.010
- Greene, J. C. (2005). The generative potential of mixed methods inquiry. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 28(2), 207–211. doi:10.1080/01406720500256293
- Gürsakal, N. (2012). Betimsel İstatistik. Bursa: Dora Publication.
- Han, Y., & Xu, Y. (2020). The development of student feedback literacy: The influences of teacher feedback on peer feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(5), 680–696. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1689545
- Hey-Cunningham, A. J., Ward, M. H., & Miller, E. J. (2020). Making the most of feedback for academic writing development in postgraduate research: Pilot of a combined programme for students and supervisors. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(2), 182–194. doi:10.1080/14703297.2020.1714472
- Iglesias Pérez, M. C., Vidal-Puga, J., & Pino Juste, M. R. (2020). The role of self and peer assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), 683–692. doi:10.1080/03075079.2020.1783526
- Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. doi:10.3102/0013189×033007014
- Karagöz, Y. (2010). Nonparametrik Tekniklerin Güç ve Etkinlikleri. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(33), 18–40. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/esosder/issue/6147/82524
- Kennette, L., & Chapman, M. 2021. Providing positive student feedback in an online environment. Academia Letters, 203, 1–3. doi: 10.20935/al203
- Ketonen, L., Nieminen, P., & Hähkiöniem, M. (2020). The development of secondary students’ feedback literacy: Peer assessment as an intervention. The Journal of Educational Research, 113(6), 407–417. doi:10.1080/00220671.2020.1835794
- Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310
- Malecka, B., Boud, D., & Carless, D. (2020). Eliciting, processing and enacting feedback: Mechanisms for embedding student feedback literacy within the curriculum. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–15. doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1754784
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage Publications.
- Min, H. T. (2006). The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(2), 118–141. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003
- Molloy, E., Boud, D., & Henderson, M. (2020). Developing a learning-centred framework for feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 527–540. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955
- Özsoy, O. (2010). İktisatçılar ve İşletmeciler İçin İstatistik Excel Uygulamalı. Ankara, Turkey: Siyasal Publication.
- Panadero, E., & Romero, M. (2014). To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of self-assessment on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy. Assessment Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 21(2), 133–148. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2013.877872
- Paterson, C., Paterson, N., Jackson, W., & Work, F. (2020). What are students’ needs and preferences for academic feedback in higher education? A systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 85, 104236. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104236
- Planas-Lladó, A., Feliu, L., Arbat, G., Pujol, J., Suñol, J. J., Castro, F., & Martí, C. (2021). An analysis of teamwork based on self and peer evaluation in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(2), 191–207. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1763254
- Price, M., Handley, K., & Millar, J. (2011). Feedback: Focusing attention on engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 36(8), 879–896. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.483513
- Prins, F. J., de Kleijn, R., & van Tartwijk, J. (2017). Students’ use of a rubric for research theses. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(1), 128–150. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1085954
- Razı, S. (2015). Development of a rubric to assess academic writing incorporating plagiarism detectors. Sage Open, 5(2), 1–13. doi:10.1177/2158244015590162
- Sutton, P. (2012). Conceptualizing feedback literacy: Knowing, being, and acting. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49(1), 31–40. doi:10.1080/14703297.2012.647781
- Tian, L., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Learner engagement with automated feedback, peer feedback and teacher feedback in an online EFL writing context. System, 91, 102247. doi:10.1016/j.system.2020.102247
- To, J. (2016). ‘This is not what I need’: Conflicting assessment feedback beliefs in a post-secondary institution in Hong Kong. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 21(4), 447–467. doi:10.1080/13596748.2016.1226588
- Wei, W., Sun, Y., & Xu, X. (2020). Investigating the impact of increased student feedback literacy level on their expectations on university teachers’ feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(7), 1092–1103. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1846017
- Winstone, N. E., Mathlin, G., & Nash, R. A. (2019). Building feedback literacy: Students’ perceptions of the developing engagement with feedback toolkit. Frontiers in Education, 4(39), 1–11. doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00039
- Winstone, N., Nash, R., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Education Psychologist, 52(1), 17–37. doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538
- Wood, J. M. (2022). Supporting the uptake process with dialogic peer screencast feedback: A sociomaterial perspective. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–23. doi:10.1080/13562517.2022.2042243
- Xu, Y., & Carless, D. (2017). ‘Only true friends could be cruelly honest’: Cognitive scaffolding and social-affective support in teacher feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(7), 1082–1094. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1226759
- Yang, M., & Carless, D. (2013). The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 285–297. doi:10.1080/13562517.2012.719154
- Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Nitel veri analizi. Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara, Turkey: Seçkin Publications.
- Yu, S., & Liu, C. (2021). Improving student feedback literacy in academic writing: An evidence-based framework. Assessing Writing, 48, 100525. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100525
- Zhan, Y. (2019). Conventional or sustainable? Chinese university students’ thinking about feedback used in their English lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(7), 973–986. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1557105
- Zheng, L., Cui, P., Li, X., & Huang, R. (2018). Synchronous discussion between assessors and assessees in web-based peer assessment: Impact on writing performance, feedback quality, meta-cognitive awareness and self-efficacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(3), 500–514. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1370533
- Zong, Z., Schunn, C. D., & Wang, Y. (2020). Learning to improve the quality peer feedback through experience with peer feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(6), 973–992. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1833179
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2022-0004 | Journal eISSN: 1027-5207
Language: English
Page range: 36 - 52
Published on: Dec 30, 2022
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Related subjects:
© 2022 Yasemin Karal, Rabia Özdemir Sarıalioğlu, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.