Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The development of student feedback literacy through peer feedback in the online learning environment Cover

The development of student feedback literacy through peer feedback in the online learning environment

Open Access
|Dec 2022

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Features of Student Feedback Literacy (used with permission)
Features of Student Feedback Literacy (used with permission)

Figure 2

The model of the study
The model of the study

Students’ perceived change or development in their perspectives on feedback, decision-making abilities, feelings, and efforts

ThemeCodeAppreciating feedbackMaking judgmentsManaging affectTaking action
Change or development FrequencyStudents’ remarksFrequencyStudents’ remarksFrequencyStudents’ remarksFrequencyStudents’ remarks

Yes36We learnt to appreciate feedback (S50)35Brainstorming on where to add to or omit from the assignment improved our ability both to think and make decisions (S6)25The critical feedback made us unhappy at first. Later, we got over it when we realized that this is good for making our assignment better (S7)50We reviewed (the assignments) as a group and negative feedback was predominant. Frankly, I realized that the critical feedback of our friends encouraged our group. We were able to say “Okay, no problem, we got this job.” (S13)

No15No, there has not been any change (S2)I had already had a positive view, there has not been any change in my point of view (S27)13No, there hasn’t. Because we did not do any activities on this. Feedback was given to us and we changed or did not change them. It was a routinized process (S19)14There has not been a change (S35)3It has affected negatively (S2)It has not affected at all. I was aware of our mistakes (S14)

Partly1Yes, partially (S42)1Yes. Partially, it has happened by (our) seeing the mistakes (S42)

Wilcoxon signed-rank test results for assessment of draft 1 and draft 3

NMean RankSum of RanksZp
Draft 3-Draft 1Negative Ranks0,00,00-3,517,000
Positive Ranks168,50136,00
Ties2
Total18

The frequency of the peer feedback messages in the affective, cognitive and metacognitive categories

DimensionCategoryFrequencyExamples
AffectiveSupporting132“The assignment is well done. Above all, thanks.”
Opposing6“There are quite a lot of deficiencies. Most necessary things are ignored.”

CognitiveDirect correction64“Pay attention to punctuation and spelling rules!”.“More simple words could have been used. For example, words like negation, extravagance, understate, equanimity are not comprehendible to all.”
Personal opinion86“The content could have been more comprehensive.”“There are too many images.”
Guidance214“Some headings suitable for the introduction are in different places. A title suitable for section three is at the beginning. You should be careful about these.”

MetacognitiveEvaluating3“None of the references are from Turkey. We are not sure how important this is, but Turkish studies could have been referred to for goodness of our country.”
Reflecting1“By looking at the other assignments, the shortcomings of this work can easily be seen. We recommend our mates to fix them with this method.”

Irrelevant comments 3“No problem.”
Total 509

Pre and post-test results on receiving or giving peer feedback

Students’ viewsPre-testPost-test
Undecided195
Negative41
Positive3047

Perceived effect or contribution of feedback to students’ perspectives, decision-making abilities and feelings

ThemeAppreciating feedbackMaking judgmentsManaging affect
Effect or contributionCodeFrequencyStudents’ remarksCodeFrequencyStudents’ remarksCodeFrequencyStudents’ remarks
Quality of assignment34Receiving peer feedback helped us improve our assignment a lot (S15)Being open to different perspectives18Although peer feedback sounds scary at first, peer feedback becomes much more positive when we overcome the fear of criticism and realize that we are human beings and cannot do everything in the best way (S47)Managing the emotions6Receiving feedback is important for being open to criticism and being respectful of different opinions. I believe it contributes to better management of our emotions (S1)
Personal development12In this process, we tried to improve ourselves by learning many issues. I can say that it will bring great benefit to my future education life (S24)Working collaboratively15Peer feedback helped us mix many ideas and find the right thing. What I understood in this study is that it can be more efficient when many people have different opinions on a subject (S39)Flexibility or maturity7I learned to see the comments in a more objective and impartial way. Earlier, critical comments might have upset me, but this is not the case anymore. I think I am approaching more professionally (S23)
Learning3The process had many stages and we gained new experiences and competencies at every stage. It was useful as we learnt different subjects (S18)Being objective4Thanks to the feedback (we received), my ability to approach impartially has improved (S23)
Inefficient3I don’t see it necessary (S42)Empathy3I understood the importance of being able to empathize. I understood that feedbacks are important for our friends to really carry their assignment to a more qualified point and it is necessary to be sensitive and thoughtful at this point (S1)
Critical thinking3I believe that my ability to read and interpret a assignment with a critical eye and to give suggestions without difficulty has improved (S15)

Descriptive statistics regarding assessment of draft 1 and draft 3

DraftsN*MeanStd. DeviationMinimumMaximum
Draft 11857,894419,3899923,6085,05
Draft 31868,825016,9322023,6087,00
Language: English
Page range: 36 - 52
Published on: Dec 30, 2022
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2022 Yasemin Karal, Rabia Özdemir Sarıalioğlu, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.