Improving Learning in a Traditional, Large-Scale Science Module with a Simple And Efficient Learning Design

Mikkel Godsk

doi:10.2478/eurodl-2014-0025

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

Improving Learning in a Traditional, Large-Scale Science Module with a Simple And Efficient Learning Design

European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning

Volume 17 (2014): Issue 2 (December 2014)

By: Mikkel Godsk

Open Access

|Mar 2015

1. Aarhus Universitet (2011). Den Faglige Udviklingsproces. Øvrige bilag. Universitetsledelsen den. 9. marts. Retrieved July 2, 2014 from http://medarbejdere.au.dk/fileadmin/res/fau/dok/fau_bilag_oevrige_bilag_090311.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar
2. Blumenfeld, P.C.; Soloway, E.; Marx, R.W.; Krajcik, J.S.; Guzdial, M.; Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. In Educational psychologist, 26(3-4), (pp. 369-398).
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
3. Bonwell, C.C. and Eison, J.A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Washington, DC: School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University.
Search in Google Scholar
4. Britain, S. (2004). A review of learning design: concept, specifications and tools. A report for the JISC E-learning Pedagogy Programme, 2006.
Search in Google Scholar
5. Brown, A.L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. In The journal of the learning sciences, 2(2), (pp. 141-178).
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
6. Conole, G. (2013). Designing for learning in an open world. New York: Springer.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
7. Conole, G. and Dyke, M. (2004). What are the affordances of information and communication technologies? In Association for Learning Technology Journal, 12(2), (pp. 113-124).
Search in Google Scholar
8. Conole, G.; Dyke, M.; Oliver, M. and Seale, J. (2004). Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective learning design. In Computers & Education, 43(1), (pp. 17-33).
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
9. Conole, G. and Fill, K. (2005). A learning design toolkit to create pedagogically effective learning activities. In Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2005(1).
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
10. Conole, G. and Oliver, M. (2002). Embedding theory into learning technology practice with toolkits. In Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2002(1).
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
11. Correll, A. (2014). Godt studiemiljø kan stadig forbedres. Retrieved from http://newsroom.au.dk/nyheder/vis/artikel/godt-studiemiljoe-kan-stadig-forbedres/.
Search in Google Scholar
12. Course Catalogue (2013). Calculus 2 (Q2) - Search Course. Retrieved March 04, 2014 from http://kursuskatalog.au.dk/en/coursecatalog/Course/show/41378/.
Search in Google Scholar
13. Creswell, J.W. (2014). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Fourth Edition. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Search in Google Scholar
14. Cross, S. and Conole, G. (2009). Learn about learning design. Part of the OU Learn about series of guides. The Open University: Milton Keynes. Retrieved from http://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/OULDI/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Learn-aboutlearning- design_v7.doc.
Search in Google Scholar
15. Daniel, J.; Kanwar, A. and Uvalić-Trumbić, S. (2009). Breaking higher education’s iron triangle: Access, cost, and quality. In Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 41(2), (pp. 30-35).
Search in Google Scholar
16. The Danish Government (2012). Danmark i arbejde - udfordringer for dansk økonomi mod 2020. Retrieved from http://www.stm.dk/multimedia/danmark_i_arbejde_- _udfordringer_for_dansk__konomi_mod_2020_web.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar
17. The Danish Ministry of Education (2014a). Andel af en årgang der forventes at få en uddannelse - Undervisningsministeriet. Retrieved from http://uvm.dk/Service/Statistik/Tvaergaaendestatistik/ Andel-af-en-aargang-der-forventes-at-faa-en-uddannelse.
Search in Google Scholar
18. The Danish Ministry of Education (2014b). Metode bag fremskrivning af en ungdomsårgangs uddannelsesniveau samt deres tidsforbrug. Retrieved from http://uvm.dk/~/media/UVM/Filer/Stat/PDF14/140321%2014022014Metode%20bag%2 0profilmodellen_ny.ashx.
Search in Google Scholar
19. Earle, R.S. (2002). The integration of instructional technology into public education: Promises and challenges. In Educational Technology, 42(1), (pp. 5-13).
Search in Google Scholar
20. Garrison, D.R. and Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. In The internet and higher education, 7(2), (pp. 95-105).
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
21. Godsk, M. (2013). STREAM: a Flexible Model for Transforming Higher Science Education into Blended and Online Learning. In T. Bastiaens & G. Marks (eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2013, (pp. 722-728). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Search in Google Scholar
22. Godsk, M. (2014). Efficient Learning Design - Concept, Catalyst, and Cases. Ascilite 2014: Rhetoric and Reality: Critical perspectives on educational technology, Dunedin, New Zealand, 23-26 November.
Search in Google Scholar
23. Hines, P.J.; Mervis, J.; McCartney, M.; Wible, B. (eds). (2013). Grand challenges in science education. Science, (p. 340).
Search in Google Scholar
24. Jones, S.R. (1992). Was there a Hawthorne effect? In American Journal of Sociology.
Search in Google Scholar
25. Mazur, E. and Hilborn, R.C. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. In Physics Today, 50(4), (pp. 68-69).
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
26. Novak, G.M.; Patterson, E.T.; Gavrin, A.D.; Christian, W. (1999). Just-in-Time Teaching: Blending Active Learning with Web Technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Search in Google Scholar
27. Price, L. and Kirkwood, A. (2011). Enhancing professional learning and teaching through technology: a synthesis of evidence-based practice among teachers in higher education. The Open University. Retrieved from http://www.lth.se/fileadmin/lth/genombrottet/DTR/PLATP_Main_Report_2011.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar
28. Romiszowski, A.J. (2004). How’s the e-learning baby? Factors leading to success or failure of an educational technology innovation. In Educational Technology, 44(1), (pp. 5-27).
Search in Google Scholar
29. Simkins, S.P. and Maier, M.H. (eds.) (2010). Just-in-Time Teaching: Across the Disciplines, and Across the Academy. Sterling: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
Search in Google Scholar
30. Twigg, C. (2009). Improving Learning and Reducing Costs for Online Learning. In P.L. Rogers, G.A. Berg, J.V. Boettcher, C. Howard, L. Justice & K. Schenk (eds.), Encyclopedia of Distance Learning, (pp. 1148-1154), Second Edition. Hershey: IGI Global.
Search in Google Scholar
31. Twigg, C. (2013). An overview of course redesign. The National Center for Academic Transformation. Retrieved from http://www.thencat.org/Articles/An Overview of Course Redesign.pdf
Search in Google Scholar
32. Weller, M. (2002). Delivering learning on the Net: The why, what & how of online education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Search in Google Scholar