An Ecology of Everyday Violence: Russian Telegram Discourse and War Atrocities in Ukraine
By: Ian Garner
References
- Alejandro, A., Zhao, L., 2023. Multi-Method Qualitative Text and Discourse Analysis: A Methodological Framework. Qualitative Inquiry, 30(6): pp 461–473. DOI: 10.1177/10778004231184421.
- Andreikovets, K., 2022. At least 458 Ukrainians died in the Bucha community as a result of the actions of the Russians. Babel.ua, 8 August.
https://babel.ua/en/news/82626-at-least-458-ukrainians-died-in-the-bucha-community-as-a-result-of-the-actions-of-the-russians (Accessed 12 September 2025). - Bandura, A., 1999. Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3): pp 193–209.
- Barceló, J., 2021. The long-term effects of war exposure on civic engagement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 118(6). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2015539118.
- Bawa, A., Kursuncu, U., Achilov, D., Shalin, V. L., Agarwal, N., Akbas, E., 2025. Telegram as a battlefield: Kremlin-related communications during the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 19(1): pp 2361–2370. DOI: 10.1609/icwsm.v19i1.35939.
- Benesch, S., 2013. Dangerous speech: A proposal to prevent group violence. In Besteman, C. (Ed.), Violence: A Reader, pp 425–434. London: Routledge.
- Brusylovska, O., Maksymenko, I., 2023. ‘Analysis of the media discourse on the 2022 war in Ukraine: The case of Russia’, Regional Science Policy & Practice, 15(1): pp 222–236. DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12579.
- Chiluwa, I., 2019. Discourse Analysis and Conflict Studies. London: SAGE Publications Limited.
- Cohen, S., 2001. States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering. Cambridge: Polity.
- Danziger, R., 2025. Interpretive constructs: The case of incitement to violence and terror. Journal of Pragmatics, 245, pp 35–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2025.06.004.
- Dean, M. C., Porter, B., 2025. Sentiment analysis of Russian-language social media posts discussing the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Armed Forces & Society, 51(4): pp 1027–1050. DOI: 10.1177/0095327X241235987.
- Dudko, O., 2022. A conceptual limbo of genocide: Russian rhetoric, mass atrocities in Ukraine, and the current definition’s limits. Canadian Slavonic Papers, 64(2–3): pp 133–145. DOI: 10.1080/00085006.2022.2106691.
- Edwards, A., 2024. Designing the ‘Good Russian Patriot’: Indoctrination, Education, and Youth in Russia. Russian Analytical Digest, (309): pp 8–12. DOI: 10.3929/ethz-b-000657554.
- Enloe, C., 2000. Maneuvers: The International Politics of Militarizing Women’s Lives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Etkind, A., 2022. Russia Against Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
- Ford, M., Hoskins, A., 2022. Radical War. London: Hurst.
- Garde-Hansen, J., 2009. My Memories? Personal Digital Archive Fever and Facebook. In Garde-Hansen, J., A. Hoskins, A. Reading, (Eds.) Save As … Digital Memories, pp 135–150. Palgrave Macmillan, London: Palgrave MacMillan.
- Garner, I., 2022. “We’ve got to kill them”: Responses to Bucha on Russian social media groups. Journal of Genocide Research, 25(3–4): pp 418–425.
- Garner, I., 2025. The duty to destroy: Russian identity formation and human (in)security in Mariupol. In Gizewski, P., Rossy, K., (Eds.) War and Human Security in an Evolving World, pp 63–78. Kingston: Kingston Consortium on International Security.
- Gilligan, E., 2009. Terror in Chechnya: Russia and the Tragedy of Civilians in War. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Gould, R. R., 2020. Language, memory, massacre: The legacy of trauma among Chechen diasporas. Journal of Literature and Trauma Studies, 9(1): pp 43–74.
- Hamarowski, B., Lompe, M., 2024. Digital witnesses to the crime: Visual representation of the Bucha massacre across social media platforms. Media, War & Conflict, 17(4): pp 578–602. DOI: 10.1177/17506352241243302.
- Haslam, N., 2006. Dehumanization: An Integrative Review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3): pp 252–264.
- Haslam, N., Loughnan, S., 2014. Dehumanization and Infrahumanization. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, pp 399–423.
- Hellbeck, J., 2006. Revolution on My Mind: Writing a Diary under Stalin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Hellbeck, J., 2015. Stalingrad: The City that Defeated the Third Reich. New York: PublicAffairs.
- Hoskins, A., 2009. ‘Flashbulb memories, psychology and media studies: Fertile ground for interdisciplinarity?’, Memory Studies, 2(2): pp 147–150. DOI: 10.1177/1750698008102049.
- Hoskins, A., 2011a. 7/7 and connective memory: Interactional trajectories of remembering in post-scarcity culture. Memory Studies, 4(3): pp 269–280.
- Hoskins, A., 2011b. ‘Anachronisms of media, anachronisms of memory: from collective memory to a new memory ecology’. In Neiger, M., Meyers, O., Zandberg, E. (Eds.), On Media Memory: Collective Memory in a New Media Age, pp 278–288. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Hoskins, A., Shchelin, P., 2022. The war feed: Digital war in plain sight. American Behavioral Scientist, 67(3): pp 449–463. DOI: 10.1177/00027642221144848.
- Hu, D., Wang, C., 2025. Hybrid Media Warfare: Discourse Analysis of Russian and Ukrainian MFA Websites on the Bucha Incident. Telematics and Informatics Reports. DOI: 10.1016/j.teler.2025.100256.
- Jackson, S. T., Crilley, R., Manor, I., 2021. Forum: Militarization 2.0 – Communication and the Normalization of Political Violence. International Studies Review, 23(3): pp 1046–1069.
- Jørgensen, M. W., Phillips, L. J., 2002. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: SAGE.
- Kermani, H., 2020. Decoding Telegram: Iranian Users and ‘Produsaging’ Discourses in Iran’s 2017 Presidential Election. Asiascape: Digital Asia, 7(1–2): pp 88–121. DOI: 10.1163/22142312-12340119.
- Kiforchuk, K., 2023. Frequency analysis of Russian propaganda Telegram channels. Theoretical and Applied Cybersecurity, 5(1). DOI: 10.20535/tacs.2664-29132023.1.277647.
- Kim, H., Jang, S. M., Kim, S. H., Wan, A., 2018. Evaluating Sampling Methods for Content Analysis of Twitter Data. Social Media + Society, 4(2). DOI: 10.1177/2056305118772836.
- Kireev, K., Mykhno, Y., Troncoso, C., Overdorf, R., 2025. Characterizing and Detecting {Propaganda-Spreading} Accounts on Telegram. In 34th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 25): pp 161–180.
- Kuzio, T., 2023. Imperial nationalism as the driver behind Russia‘s invasion of Ukraine. Nations and Nationalism, 29(1): pp 30–38. DOI: 10.1111/nana.12875.
- Laryš, M., 2025. ‘Liberation’ of ‘younger brothers’ or genocide of subhumans? Genocidal discourses on Ukrainians in Putin’s regime. Nations and Nationalism. DOI: 10.1111/nana.13120.
- Lazaraton, A., 2002. ‘Quantitative and qualitative approaches to discourse analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, pp 32–51. DOI: 10.1017/S0267190502000028.
- Lemkin Center, 2025. “Nie atakujemy cywili …” Zielony korytarz w Łypiwce jako pułapka rosyjskich wojsk okupacyjnych.
https://instytutpileckiego.pl/pl/instytut/aktualnosci/raport (Accessed 28 August 2025). - Maathuis, C., Kerkhof, I., 2023. First Six Months of War from Ukrainian Topic and Sentiment Analysis. In: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Social Media. Kraków, pp 163–173.
- Makhortykh, M., Kulichkina, A., Maikovska, K. 2025. Evolution of wartime discourse on Telegram: A comparative study of Ukrainian and Russian policymakers’ communication before and after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. arXiv:2510.11746.
- Mälksoo, M., 2023. The postcolonial moment in Russia’s war against Ukraine. Journal of Genocide Research. 25(3–4): pp 471–481. DOI: 10.1080/14623528.2022.2074947.
- Mayring, P., 2015. Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical background and procedures. In Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., Knipping, C., Presmeg, N. (Eds.), Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education, pp 365–380. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_13.
- McGlynn, J., 2022. Russia’s War. Cambridge: Polity.
- McGlynn, J., Garner, I., 2022. Russia’s war crime denials are fuel for more atrocities. Foreign Policy, 23 April.
https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/04/23/propaganda-russia-atrocity-bucha/ (Accessed 1 October 2025). - Moore, A., Purdy, K., Lanier, D., 2025. More than meets the eye: The Canadian Armed Forces and human security – A visiting defence fellow’s perspective. In Gizewski, P., Rossy, K., (Eds.). War and Human Security in an Evolving World, pp 9–40. Kingston: Centre for International & Defence Policy.
- Nelson, L. K., Burk, D., Knudsen, M., McCall, L., 2021. The Future of Coding: A Comparison of Hand-Coding and Three Types of Computer-Assisted Text Analysis Methods. Sociological Methods & Research, 50(1): pp 202–237.
- Oksamytna, K., 2023. Imperialism, supremacy, and the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Contemporary Security Policy, 44(4): pp 497–512. DOI: 10.1080/13523260.2023.2259661.
- Oleinik, A., Paniotto, V., 2023. War propaganda unfolded: Comparative effectiveness of propaganda and counterpropaganda in Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. International Journal of Communication, 17.
- Oleinik, A., 2024. A Comparative Analysis of Political and Media Discourses about Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine. Cham: Springer.
- OSCE, 2022. Report on violations of IHL and IHRL in Ukraine since 24 February 2022. 20 July.
https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/c/d/523081_0.pdf (Accessed 12 September 2025). - Paul, C., Matthews, M., 2016. The Russian “Firehose of Falsehood” Propaganda Model. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
- Polegkyi, O., 2023. Russian disinformation and propaganda before and after the invasion of Ukraine. Rocznik Instytutu Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej. 21(1): pp 91–107. DOI: 10.36874/RIESW.2023.1.6.
- Renic, N., 2024. The Cost of Atrocity: Strategic Implications of Russian Battlefield Misconduct in Ukraine. Ethics & International Affairs, 38(1): pp 6–16. DOI: 10.1017/S0892679424000054.
- Reuters, 2022. Mayor says 200–300 civilians killed in Irpin. 30 March.
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/mayor-says-200-300-civilians-have-been-killed-ukrainian-town-irpin-2022-03-30/ (Accessed 16 September 2025). - Riabchuk, M., 2022. Calling a spade a spade: How to unwrap a genocidal essence from the Kremlin anti-Ukrainian rhetoric. Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture, 6(4): pp 8–20. DOI: 10.14394/eidos.jpc.2022.0031.
- Savage, R., 2013. Modern genocidal dehumanization: A new model. Patterns of Prejudice, 47(2): pp 139–161. DOI: 10.1080/0031322X.2012.754575.
- Schreier, M., 2012. Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. London: SAGE.
- Stavrianakis, A., Selby, J., (Eds.), 2013. Militarism and International Relations: Political Economy, Security, Theory. London: Routledge.
- Suliman, A., Pietsch, B., Parker, C., 2022. Russia’s attacks on civilians in Mariupol are ‘war crimes,’ OSCE says. The Washington Post, 13 April.
- Sykes, G. M., Matza, D., 1957. Techniques of neutralization. American Sociological Review, 22(6): pp 664–670.
- Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R., Vetter, E., 2000. Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis: In Search of Meaning. London: SAGE.
- Tretiakov, A., D‘Antonio-Maceiras, S., Hernández, Á., Martín, A., 2025. Toxic Discourse in the Digital Battlefield: Analysing Telegram Channels During the Russia-Ukraine ‘Conflict’. Expert Systems, 42(7). DOI: 10.1111/exsy.70081.
- Vanetik, N., Litvak, M., Reviakin, E., Tiamanova, M., 2023. Propaganda detection in Russian Telegram posts in the scope of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, pp 1162–1170.
- War of Words, 2024. Pro Servis.
https://warofwords.info/theproject (Accessed 10 September 2025). - Zavershinskaia, P., 2024. State’s legitimisation of violence through strategic narration: How the Kremlin justified the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The International Spectator, 59(2): pp 18–36. DOI: 10.1080/03932729.2024.2327492.
- Zelenkauskaite, A., 2025. Quantitative balance, qualitative dissonance? Telegram as a wartime source. First Monday.
https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/14343/12079 (Accessed 1 September 2025).
Language: English, Slovenian
Page range: 29 - 52
Published on: Mar 31, 2026
Published by: General Staff of the Slovenian Armed Forces
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2026 Ian Garner, published by General Staff of the Slovenian Armed Forces
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.