Figure 1

Figure 2

Influence of AUSN3 treatment on the adhesion of Aeromonas sp_ to meat and contact surfaces of meatTabelle 2_ Einfluss der AUSN3-Behandlung auf die Adhäsion von Aeromonas sp_ zu Fleisch und Kontaktflächen von Fleisch
| Cultivation media | Treatment | Number of cells adhered (log CFU/g)* | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meat surface | Contact surface of meat | ||||||
| Beef | Mutton | Pork | Polystyrene | Glass | Stainless steel | ||
| PCA agar | AUSN3 | 5.8 ± 0.03c | 5.5 ± 0.11b | 5.6 ± 0.04c | 4.3 ± 0.10c | 3.4 ± 0.0b | 3.2 ± 0.1b |
| Preservative | 6.4 ± 0.04b | 5.9 ± 0.08a,b | 6.4 ± 0.10b | 5.2 ± 0.08b | 4.9 ± 0.4a | 5.5 ± 0.1a | |
| Control | 7.2 ± 0.10a | 6.3 ± 0.44a | 7.1 ± 0.12a | 6.1 ± 0.10a | 5.3 ± 0.1a | 5.7 ± 0.0 a | |
Influence of nanoemulsion treatment on the hydrophobicity and biofilm formation of Aeromonas sp_Tabelle 1_ Veränderungen der Hydrophobizität und Biofilmbildung von Aeromonas sp_ durch die Nanoemulsionsbehandlung
| Treatment | Hydrophobicity (SAT) | Swarming motility % surface coverage | Biofilm formation (OD 595 nm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUSN3 | >1.6 | 17.5 ± 2.4c | 0.54 ± 0.18c |
| Preservative | 1.2 | 29.6 ±3.2b | 0.94 ± 0.12b |
| Control | 0.8 | 34.9 ± 2.7a | 1.42 ± 0.22a |