Have a personal or library account? Click to login
One and Done, or a Bundle and Stumble? An Exploration of Assessment Methods in Undergraduate Science Curricula Cover

One and Done, or a Bundle and Stumble? An Exploration of Assessment Methods in Undergraduate Science Curricula

By: Shelley Edwards  
Open Access
|Nov 2022

References

  1. Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945-1969.10.1080/09500690701749305
  2. Arbesman, S. (2012). Truth decay: The half-life of facts. New Scientist, 215(2883), 36-39.
  3. Atash, M. N., & Dawson, G. O. (1986). Some effects of the ISCS program: A meta analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 377-85.10.1002/tea.3660230502
  4. Babcock, P., & Marks, M. (2011). The falling time cost of college: Evidence from half a century of time use data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(2), 468-478.10.1162/REST_a_00093
  5. Bauer, H. H. (1992). Scientific Literacy and the Myth of the Scientific Method. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
  6. Black, P. J., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2002). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. London, UK: King’s College London School of Education.
  7. Black, P. (2003a). Turning Research Results into Practice: How does the D Fit into the R&D? Paper presented at AERA Chicago 21 April 2003. Mathematics Education SIG Session 20.061: http://www.kcl.ac.uk//depsta/education/hpages/pblackpubs.html
  8. Black, P. (2003b). The Nature and Value of Formative Assessment for Learning. Paper presented at AERA Chicago 22 April 2003, Presidential invited session 34.011: http://www.kcl.ac.uk//depsta/education/hpages/pblackpubs.html
  9. Black, P. (2003c). Formative and Summative Assessment: Can They Serve Learning Together? Paper presented at AERA Chicago 23 April 2003. SIG Classroom Assessment Meeting 52.028. Retrieved from http://www.kcl.ac.uk//depsta/education/hpages/pblackpubs.html
  10. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74.10.1080/0969595980050102
  11. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for Learning. Putting it into Practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  12. Bloom, B. S. (1969). Some theoretical issues relating to educational evaluation. In R. W. Tyler (Ed.), Educational evaluation: New roles, new means (National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, Vol. 68, Part 2, pp. 26-50). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  13. Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., & Madaus, G. F. (1971). Handbook on Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  14. Boud, D. J. (1995). Enhancing Learning through Self Assessment. London: Kogan Page.
  15. Bredderman, T. (1983). Effects of activity-based elementary science on student outcomes: A quantitative synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 499-518.10.3102/00346543053004499
  16. Campitelli, G., & Gobet, F. (2011). Deliberate practice: Necessary but not sufficient. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(5), 280-285.10.1177/0963721411421922
  17. Carroll, M. (1995). Formative assessment workshops: Feedback sessions for large classes. Biochemical Education, 23(2), 65-67.10.1016/0307-4412(95)00001-J
  18. Cowan, J. (1998). On Becoming an Innovative University Teacher - Reflection in Action. Buckingham: Society for Research into higher education, & Open University Press.
  19. Cowan, N. (2014). Working memory underpins cognitive development, learning, and education. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 197-223.10.1007/s10648-013-9246-y
  20. Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C., & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987-2003. Review of Educational Research, 71(6), 1-62.10.3102/00346543076001001
  21. Dillon, J. (2002). Managing teacher development: the changing role of the Head of Department in England. In P. Fraser-Abder (Ed.), Professional Development in Science Teacher Education: Local Insights with Lessons for the Global Community (pp. 172-86). London: Taylor and Francis.
  22. Donnelly, J. F., & Jenkins, E. W. (2001). Science Education, Policy, Professionalism and Change. London: Paul Chapman.10.4135/9781446219447
  23. Engel, A. (2013). The missing narrative: Understanding the difference between education “reform” and “innovation”. The FM Duffy Reports, 18(3), 1-10.
  24. Fairweather, J. (2008). Linking evidence and promising practices in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) undergraduate education. Board of Science Education, National Research Council, The National Academies, Washington, DC.
  25. Fisher, D., Fairweather, J., & Amey, M. (2003). Systemic reform in undergraduate engineering education: The role of collective responsibility. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19, 768-776.
  26. Gilbert, J. K., & Boulter, C. (Eds.) (2000). Developing Models in Science Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-010-0876-1
  27. Harlen, W., & James, M. (1997). Assessment and learning: Differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. Assessment in Education, 4(3), 365-379.10.1080/0969594970040304
  28. Harlen, W. (2006). On the relationship between assessment for formative and summative purposes. In J. Gardiner (Ed.), Assessment and learning. London, UK: Sage Publications.
  29. Harlen, W., & Deakin Crick, R. (2003). Testing and motivation for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 10(2), 169-207.10.1080/0969594032000121270
  30. Hattie, J. (1999). Influences on Student Learning. Inaugural Lecture: Professor of Education, University of Auckland Retrieved from www.education.auckland.ac.nz/uoa/fms/default/education/staff/Prof.%20John%20Hattie/Documents/Presentations/influences/Influences_on_student_learning.pdf)
  31. High Level Group on Science Education. (2007). Science Now: A Renewed Pedagogy for the Future of Europe. Brussels: European Union.
  32. Hodson, D. (1990). A critical look at practical work in school science. School Science Review, 71(256), 33-40.
  33. Kuh, G., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J., & Witt, E. (2005). Student Success in College: Creating Conditions that Matter. Washington, D.C.: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
  34. Kuh, G., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J., Bridges, B., & Kayek, J. (2007). Piecing Together the Student Success Puzzle: Research, Propositions, and Recommendations. Washington, D.C.: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
  35. Lucido, H. (2010). Educational Genocide: A Plague on Our Children. United Kingdom: Rowman, & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
  36. Lucido, H. (2015). Returning Sanity to the Classroom: Eliminating the Testing Mania. United Kingdom: Rowman, & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
  37. Lunetta, V. N., Hofstein, A., & Clough, M. P. (2007). Teaching and learning in the school science laboratory: An analysis of research, theory, and practice. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 393-431). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  38. Marks, I. (2022). Formative vs. summative assessment in the work of a teacher. In Tamášová, V. et al., Innovation in Current Educational Practice and Its Management (pp.151-157). London: STS Science Centre.
  39. Monk, M., & Dillon, J. (1995). From telling to selling: One historical perspective on consultancy in science education. Journal of Education Policy, 10(3), 317-323.10.1080/0268093950100306
  40. Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2000). Pupils’ and Parents’ Views of the School Science Curriculum: A Study Funded by the Wellcome Trust. London: King’s College London.
  41. Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science Education in Europe: Critical Reflections. London: Nuffield Foundation.
  42. Osborne, J., Ratcliffe, M., Collins, S., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What ‘ideas-about science’ should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the ‘Expert’ community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692-720.10.1002/tea.10105
  43. Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2010). Good Practice in Science Teaching: What research has to say (2nd edition). England: Open University Press.
  44. Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (2005). How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  45. Rolfe, I., & McPherson, J. (1995). Formative assessment: How am I doing?. Lancet, 345(8953), 837-839.
  46. Russell, D. R. (2002). Writing in the Academic Disciplines: A Curricular History. SIU Press.
  47. Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems’. Instructional Science, 18(2), 145-65.10.1007/BF00117714
  48. Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice, 5(1), 77-85.10.1080/0969595980050104
  49. Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. E. Stake, Curriculum evaluation (American Educational Research Association monograph series on evaluation, no. 1). Chicago: Rand McNally.
  50. Shymansky, J. A., Kyle, W. C., Jr., & Alport, J. M. (1983). The effects of new science curricula on student performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 387-404.10.1002/tea.3660200504
  51. Skinner, B. F. (1974). About Behaviorism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
  52. Stohr-Hunt, P. M. (1996). An analysis of the frequency of hands-on experience and science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 101-109. Tamášová, V. (2022). Motivation as part of formative education and assessment.10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199601)33:1<101::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-Z
  53. Tamášová, V. et al., Innovation in Current Educational Practice and Its Management (pp. 122-144). London: STS Science Centre.
  54. Taras, M. (2001). The use of tutor feedback and student self-assessment in summative assessment tasks: Towards transparency for students and for tutors. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(6), 605-614.10.1080/02602930120093922
  55. Taras, M. (2005). Assessment-summative and formative-some theoretical reflections. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(4), 466-478.10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00307.x
  56. Taras, M. (2008). Summative and formative assessment: Perceptions and realities. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(2), 172-192.10.1177/1469787408091655
  57. Tippin, G. K., Lafreniere, K. D., & Page, S. (2012). Student perception of academic grading: Personality, academic orientation, and effort. Active Learning in Higher Education, 13(1), 51-61.10.1177/1469787411429187
  58. Torrance, H. (1993). Formative assessment: Some theoretical problems and empirical questions. Cambridge Journal of Education, 23(3), 333-343.10.1080/0305764930230310
  59. Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (1998). Investigating Formative Assessment: Teaching, Learning and Assessment in the Classroom. Buckingham: Oxford University Press.
  60. Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (2001). Developing formative assessment in the classroom: Using action research to explore and modify theory. British Educational Research Journal, 27(5), 615-631.10.1080/01411920120095780
  61. Trautwein, U., & Köller, O. (2003). The relationship between homework and achievement - Still much of a mystery. Educational Psychology Review, 15(2), 115-145.10.1023/A:1023460414243
  62. Vaz, M., Avadhany, S. T., & Rao, B. S. (1996). Student perspectives on the role of formative assessment in physiology. Medical Teacher, 18(4), 324-326.10.3109/01421599609034185
  63. Wiliam, D. (1994). Towards a Philosophy for Educational Assessment. An update on a paper given at the British Educational Research Association’s 20th Annual conference in Oxford in 1994. Retrieved from http://www.kcl.ac.uk//depsta/education/hpages/dwliam.html
  64. Wiliam, D. (2000). Integrating Summative and Formative Functions of Assessment. Keynote address to the European Association for Educational Assessment, Prague: Czech Republic, November 2000. Retrieved from http://www.kcl.ac.uk//depsta/education/hpages/dwliam.html
  65. Wiliam, D. (2006). Formative assessment: getting the focus right. Educational Assessment, 11, 283-289.10.1207/s15326977ea1103&4_7
  66. Wiliam, D., & Black, P. (1996). Meanings and consequences: A basis for distinguishing formative and summative functions of assessment? British Educational Research Journal, 22(5), 537-548.10.1080/0141192960220502
  67. Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education, 11(1), 49-65.10.1080/0969594042000208994
  68. Wood, R. (1987). Measurement and Assessment in Education and Psychology: Collected Papers 1967-1987. London: Falmer.
  69. Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45(4), 477-501.10.1023/A:1023967026413
  70. Zinn, T. E., Magnotti, J. F., Marchuk, K., Schultz, B. S., Luther, A., & Varfolomeeva, V. (2011). Does effort still count? More on what makes the grade? Teaching of Psychology, 38 (1), 10-15.10.1177/0098628310390907
Language: English
Page range: 47 - 61
Submitted on: May 23, 2022
Accepted on: Jun 17, 2022
Published on: Nov 15, 2022
Published by: DTI University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2022 Shelley Edwards, published by DTI University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.