A Systematic Literature Review of Trends in Research and Practice Among Asynchronous Online Course Offerings in Formal Engineering Curricula

Javeed Kittur; Samantha R. Brunhaver; Jennifer M. Bekki; Katreena Thomas

doi:10.21061/see.122

A Systematic Literature Review of Trends in Research and Practice Among Asynchronous Online Course Offerings in Formal Engineering Curricula

Studies in Engineering Education

Volume 5 (2024): Issue 2

By: Javeed Kittur , Samantha R. Brunhaver , Jennifer M. Bekki and Katreena Thomas

Open Access

|Jul 2024

Abstract

Online engineering education is gaining increasing acceptance and recognition globally due to its benefits of accessibility, flexibility, and scalability. Prior research in online education has shown that it has enormous benefits for a wide range of students and learners. However, engineering education and research have been slower than other fields in adopting and investigating the online educational format. This paper presents a systematic literature review (SLR) on research in asynchronous online engineering education, with the goal of examining current knowledge related to this topic and supporting future scaling efforts. Thirty-nine publications between 2011 and 2020 met criteria to be included in the final synthesis phase of our review process. These studies were classified under five themes: content design and delivery, student engagement and interactions, assessment, feedback, and challenges. Findings related to each theme and their associated implications for research and practice are discussed in the paper. Additionally, a descriptive analysis of current trends in research on asynchronous online engineering education revealed (i) increasing interest in the online learning format by both researchers and practitioners over time, (ii) a majority of the research on this topic originating within the US, (iii) broad applicability of online learning across engineering disciplines, and (iv) a relatively large scope for the creation, testing, and application of theoretical and conceptual frameworks in the asynchronous online engineering learning space.

References

Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., Poulin, R., & Straut, T. T. (2016). Online report card. Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED572777.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Andersson, C., & Logofatu, D. (2018, April). Implementation of online problem-based learning for mechanical engineering students. In 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 484–488). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363270
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Anwar, S., Bascou, N. A., Menekse, M., & Kardgar, A. (2019). A systematic review of studies on educational robotics. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 9(2), 2. DOI: 10.7771/2157-9288.1223
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Astatke, Y., & Scott, C. J. (2011, June). Electric circuits online: Towards a completely online electrical engineering curriculum. 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 22–545). DOI: 10.18260/1-2--17826
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Avanzato, R. L. (2017, June). Virtual world technology to support student collaboration in an online engineering course. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--29106
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Badjou, S., & Dahmani, R. (2013). Current status of online science and engineering education. Journal of Online Engineering Education, 4(1), 9. https://onlineengineeringeducation.com/index.php/joee/article/view/56
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Badurdeen, F., Baker, J. R., Rouch, K. E., Goble, C. F., Swan, G. M., Brown, A., & Jawahir, I. S. (2015, June). Development of an online master’s degree program in manufacturing systems engineering. 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 26–532). DOI: 10.18260/p.23871
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Balagiu, A., & Sandiuc, C. (2020). Developing an online course for marine engineering. Scientific Bulletin “Mircea cel Batran” Naval Academy, 23(1), 282 A–286. DOI: 10.21279/1454-864X-20-I1-040
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Batanero, C., de-Marcos, L., Holvikivi, J., Hilera, J. R., & Otón, S. (2019). Effects of new supportive technologies for blind and deaf engineering students in online learning. IEEE Transactions on Education, 62(4), 270–277. DOI: 10.1109/TE.2019.2899545
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bir, D. D., & Ahn, B. (2017, June). Examining student attitudes to improve an undergraduate online engineering course. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--28317
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Borrego, M., Foster, M. J., & Froyd, J. E. (2014). Systematic literature reviews in engineering education and other developing interdisciplinary fields. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 45–76. DOI: 10.1002/jee.20038
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Borrego, M., Nguyen, K. A., Crockett, C., DeMonbrun, M., Shekhar, P., Tharayil, S., … & Waters, C. (2018, October). Systematic literature review of students’ affective responses to active learning: Overview of results. In 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1–7). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2018.8659306
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bowers, J., & Kumar, P. (2015). Students’ perceptions of teaching and social presence: A comparative analysis of face-to-face and online learning environments. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 10(1), 27–44. DOI: 10.4018/ijwltt.2015010103
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bozkurt, I., & Helm, J. (2013). Development and application of a systems engineering framework to support online course design and delivery. Advances in Engineering Education, 3(3), n3. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1076072.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chatterjee, R., Kamal, A. E., & Wang, Z. (2016, June). Alternate assessments to support formative evaluations in an asynchronous online computer engineering graduate course. 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. DOI: 10.18260/p.26549
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chen, B., Bastedo, K., & Howard, W. (2018). Exploring design elements for online STEM courses: Active learning, engagement & assessment design. Online Learning, 22(2), 59–75. DOI: 10.24059/olj.v22i2.1369
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Clapton, J., Rutter, D., & Sharif, N. (2009). SCIE Systematic mapping guidance. London: SCIE. https://lx.iriss.org.uk/sites/default/files/resources/rr03.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cooper, M. E., Bullard, L. G., Spencer, D., & Willis, C. (2020). Direct and indirect assessment of student perspectives and performance in an online/distance education chemical engineering bridging course sequence. Chemical Engineering Education, 54(2), 59–70. https://journals.flvc.org/cee/article/view/114938
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Danaher, M. (2014, December). Online engineering courses: Benchmarking quality. In 2014 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL) (pp. 1079–1086). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICL.2014.7017933
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
de la Torre, L., Sàenz, J., Chaos, D., Sánchez, J., & Dormido, S. (2020). A master course on automatic control based on the use of online labs. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 53(2), 17542–17547. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.2666
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fatehiboroujeni, S., Qattawi, A., & Goyal, S. (2019, June). Assessing and improving student engagement and motivation in mechanical engineering online courses. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--32111
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fu, P. (2019, June). Trifecta of engagement in an online engineering management course. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--33466
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gregori, P., Martínez, V., & Moyano-Fernández, J. J. (2018). Basic actions to reduce dropout rates in distance learning. Evaluation and Program Planning, 66, 48–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.10.004
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hachey, A. C., Wladis, C., & Conway, K. (2015). Prior online course experience and GPA as predictors of subsequent online STEM course outcomes. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 11–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.10.003
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Halada, G. P. (2017, June). Learning from engineering disasters: A multidisciplinary online course. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--28612
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hammout, N., & Hosseini, S. (2020, April). Involvement of students in online master’s studies of Engineering and Science: a path to minimize the gender gap in STEM. In 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 273–278). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125397
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Herbert, M. (2006). Staying the course: A study in online student satisfaction and retention. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 9(4), 300–317. https://ojdla.com/archive/winter94/herbert94.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1–13. DOI: 10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kiridena, S. B., Samaranayake, P., & Hastie, D. B. (2014, December). Instructional design for online course delivery in engineering management: Synthesizing learning styles, pedagogical perspectives and contingency factors. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (pp. 1198–1203). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/IEEM.2014.7058828
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kittur, J., Bekki, J., & Brunhaver, S. (2021). Development of a student engagement score for online undergraduate engineering courses using learning management system interaction data. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 30(3), 661–677. DOI: 10.1002/cae.22479
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 159–174. DOI: 10.2307/2529310
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lawton, D., Vye, N., Bransford, J., Sanders, E., Richey, M., French, D., & Stephens, R. (2012). Online learning based on essential concepts and formative assessment. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(2), 244–287. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00050.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Levy, Y., & Ramim, M. M. (2017). The e-learning skills gap study: Initial results of skills desired for persistence and success in online engineering and computing courses. In Proceeding of the Chais 2017 Conference on Innovative and Learning Technologies Research (pp. 57–68). https://www.openu.ac.il/innovation/chais2017/a1_2.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mansor, M. S. A., & Ismail, A. (2012). Learning styles and perception of engineering students towards online learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 669–674. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.459
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Matzakos, N. M., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2018). An analysis of first year engineering students’ satisfaction with a support distance learning program in mathematics. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 869–891. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-017-9641-y
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Minichiello, A., Legler, N., Hailey, C., & Adams, V. D. (2013, October). Online engineering course design, Part I: Toward asynchronous, web-based delivery of a first course in thermodynamics. In 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1928–1934). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2013.6685171
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
National Center for Education Statistics. (2023). Undergraduate enrollment. Condition of Education. US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cha
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Odom, P. W., Merzdorf, H. E., Montalvo, F. J., & Davis, J. M. (2019, June). Analysis of student engagement data from US News & World Report regarding online graduate engineering programs. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--32087
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, 1–36. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n160
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pamplona, S., Seoane, I., & Bravo-Agapito, J. (2018, October). Assessing conceptual knowledge in three online engineering courses: theory of computation and compiler construction, operating systems, and signal and systems. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Data Science, E-learning and Information Systems (pp. 1–6). DOI: 10.1145/3279996.3280005
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pedrosa, D., Morgado, L., Cravino, J., Fontes, M. M., Castelhano, M., Machado, C., & Curado, E. (2020, June). Challenges implementing the SimProgramming approach in online software engineering education for promoting self and co-regulation of learning. In 2020 6th International Conference of the Immersive Learning Research Network (iLRN) (pp. 236–242). IEEE. DOI: 10.23919/iLRN47897.2020.9155183
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Perales Jarillo, M., Pedraza, L., Moreno Ger, P., & Bocos, E. (2019). Challenges of online higher education in the face of the Sustainability Objectives of the United Nations: Carbon footprint, accessibility and social inclusion. Sustainability, 11(20), 5580. DOI: 10.3390/su11205580
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pohl, L. M., & Walters, S. (2015, June). Instructional videos in an online engineering economics course. 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 26–979). DOI: 10.18260/p.24316
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Purwar, A., & Scott, C. A. (2019, June). An online engineering dynamics class for college sophomores: Design, implementation, and assessment. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--32082
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Robertson, S. G. (2020). Factors that influence students’ decision to drop out of an online business course (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University). https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=9689&context=dissertations
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rutz, E., & Ehrlich, S. (2016, June). Increasing learner engagement in online learning through use of interactive feedback: results of a pilot study. 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. DOI: 10.18260/p.25672
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sancho-Vinuesa, T., Masià, R., Fuertes-Alpiste, M., & Molas-Castells, N. (2018). Exploring the effectiveness of continuous activity with automatic feedback in online calculus. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26(1), 62–74. DOI: 10.1002/cae.21861
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schutz, D. M., Kim, Y. Y., & Dionne, D. (2018, June). Factors influencing student veteran participation in online engineering education. 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--30506
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group. http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/highered.html
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sezgin, S., & Sevim Cirak, N. (2021). The role of MOOCs in engineering education: An exploratory systematic review of peer-reviewed literature. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(4), 950–968. DOI: 10.1002/cae.22350
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2016). A national study of differences between online and classroom-only community college students in time to first associate degree attainment, transfer, and dropout. Online Learning, 20(3), 14–15. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1113344.pdf. DOI: 10.24059/olj.v20i3.984
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Siddhpura, A., & Siddhpura, M. (2020, December). Plagiarism, contract cheating and other academic misconducts in online engineering education: Analysis, detection and prevention strategies. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE) (pp. 112–119). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/TALE48869.2020.9368311
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Simpson, O. (2010). “22%—can we do better?”: The CWP retention literature review. Report to the Centre for Widening Participation, Open University. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15450.16329
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Smith, B. G. (2010). E-learning technologies: A comparative study of adult learners enrolled on blended and online campuses engaging in a virtual classroom (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University). https://www.proquest.com/docview/746605945?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Dissertations%20&%20Theses
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Staubitz, T., Traifeh, H., Chujfi, S., & Meinel, C. (2020, August). Have your tickets ready! impede free riding in large scale team assignments. Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale (pp. 349–352). DOI: 10.1145/3386527.3406744
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Uribe, M. D. R., Magana, A. J., Bahk, J. H., & Shakouri, A. (2016). Computational simulations as virtual laboratories for online engineering education: A case study in the field of thermoelectricity. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 24(3), 428–442. DOI: 10.1002/cae.21721
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
van de Vegte, J. (2017, July). Intercultural engineering online: Getting humanitarian engineering on the agenda. In 2017 IEEE Canada International Humanitarian Technology Conference (IHTC) (pp. 80–84). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/IHTC.2017.8058205
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Verdin, D., Godwin, A., & Capobianco, B. (2016). Systematic review of the funds of knowledge framework in STEM education. DOI: 10.18260/p.25999
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Willging, P. A., & Johnson, S. D. (2009). Factors that influence students’ decision to dropout of online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(3), 115–127. DOI: 10.24059/olj.v13i3.1659
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yousuf, B., & Conlan, O. (2017). Supporting student engagement through explorable visual narratives. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 11(3), 307–320. DOI: 10.1109/TLT.2017.2722416
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zhang, Y. (2020). A cross-referencing system for curriculum coordination in multi-institution online graduate engineering degree programs: Case study of the Virginia engineering online program. In Proceedings of the International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management. (pp. 1–6). American Society for Engineering Management (ASEM). https://login.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/login?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.proquest.com%2Fconference-papers-proceedings%2Fcross-referencing-system-curriculum-coordination%2Fdocview%2F2486553360%2Fse-2%3Faccountid%3D12964
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/see.122 | Journal eISSN: 2690-5450

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 67 - 91

Submitted on: Jan 30, 2023

Accepted on: Jul 3, 2024

Published on: Jul 24, 2024

Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Keywords:

systematic literature review

© 2024 Javeed Kittur, Samantha R. Brunhaver, Jennifer M. Bekki, Katreena Thomas, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 5 (2024): Issue 2