Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Impact of Undergraduate Peer Teaching Experience on Chemistry Problem-Solving Cover

Impact of Undergraduate Peer Teaching Experience on Chemistry Problem-Solving

Open Access
|Aug 2026

References

  1. Abbot, S., Graf, A. J., & Chatfield, B. (2018). Listening to undergraduate peer tutors: Roles, relationships, and challenges. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 30(2), 245261.
  2. Achat-Mendes, C., Anfuso, C., Johnson, C., Shepler, B., Hurst-Kennedy, J., Pinzon, K., Simmons, R., Dekhane, S., Savage, J., Sudduth, E., D’Costa, A., Leader, T., Pursell, D., Runck, C., & Awong-Taylor, J. (2019). Learning, leaders, and STEM skills: Adaptation of the Supplemental Instruction model to improve STEM success and build transferable skills in undergraduate courses and beyond. Journal of STEM Education, 20(2), 1423.
  3. Anderson, C. A., Krull, D. S., & Weiner, B. (1996). Explanations: Processes and consequences. Guilford Press.
  4. Arendale, D. R. (1994). Understanding the Supplemental Instruction model. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1994(60), 1121. 10.1002/tl.37219946004
  5. Barnard, R. A., Boothe, J. R., Salvatore, J., Emerson, K., Boone, A., Sandler, C., & Coppola, B. P. (2018). Course-based support for peer-led study group facilitators in a large instructional team. Journal of College Science Teaching, 47(4), 2129. 10.2505/4/jcst18_047_04_21
  6. Bodner, G., & Elmas, R. (2020). The impact of inquiry-based, group-work approaches to instruction on both students and their peer leaders. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 5166. 10.30935/scimath/9546
  7. Burgos, M., Tizón-Escamilla, N., & Chaverri, J. (2025). A model for problem creation: Implications for teacher training. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 37(1), 5584. 10.1007/s13394-023-00482-w
  8. Clements, K. A., Vallone, K. T., Clements, T. P., Catania, E. H., Claiborne, L. L., Friedman, K. L., Graham, T. R., Johnson, H. J., Starko, S. R., Todd, T. D., Watkins, J., & Brame, C. J. (2025). Impacts of learning assistants on student belonging and confidence vary across science disciplines and course contexts. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 24(2), ar26. 10.1187/cbe.24-07-0179
  9. Clements, T. P., Friedman, K. L., Johnson, H. J., Meier, C. J., Watkins, J., Brockman, A. J., & Brame, C. J. (2022). “It made me feel like a bigger part of the STEM community”: Incorporation of learning assistants enhances students’ sense of belonging in a large introductory biology course. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(2), ar26. 10.1187/cbe.21-09-0287
  10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 10.4324/9780203771587
  11. Durante, K. A., Mari, V. Z., & Caputo, C. (2024). Supplemental Instruction at a Hispanic-serving institution: Moving towards a model to improve equity in student outcomes. Journal of Latinos and Education, 23(2), 576588. 10.1080/15348431.2022.2159827
  12. Frey, R. F., Fink, A., Cahill, M. J., McDaniel, M. A., & Solomon, E. D. (2018). Peer-led team learning in general chemistry I: Interactions with identity, academic preparation, and a course-based intervention. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(12), 21032113. 10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00375
  13. Gafney, L., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2007). Evaluating peer-led team learning: A study of long-term effects on former workshop peer leaders. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(3), 535539. 10.1021/ed084p535
  14. Gauvain, M. (2020). Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory. In J. B. Benson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of infant and early childhood development (2nd ed., pp. 446454). Elsevier. 10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.23569-4
  15. Griffin, J. H., Thompson, J. C., López, P. A., & Link, R. D. (2024). Leveraging undergraduate learning assistants when implementing new laboratory curricula. Frontiers in Education, 9. 10.3389/feduc.2024.1367087
  16. Hockings, S. C., DeAngelis, K. J., & Frey, R. F. (2008). Peer-led team learning in general chemistry: Implementation and evaluation. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(7), 990996. 10.1021/ed085p990
  17. Kim, H.-Y. (2019). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: The independent samples t-test. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 44(3), e26. 10.5395/rde.2019.44.e26
  18. Lewis, S. E. (2011). Retention and reform: An evaluation of peer-led team learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(6), 703707. 10.1021/ed100689m
  19. Lin, P., Zhou, Q., Ma, J., Wang, X., & Wu, J. (2018). Peer tutoring in higher education: Power from pedagogical training. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 723. 10.1057/s41599-025-04860-6
  20. Mazari, N. (2025). Building metacognitive skills using AI tools to help higher education students reflect on their learning process. RHS: Revista Humanismo y Sociedad, 13(1), 120. 10.22209/rhs.v13n1a04
  21. Mees, A., Collins, D., & Collins, L. (2025). Developing coaches through a cognitive apprenticeship approach: A case study from adventure sports. Education Sciences, 15(3), 288. 10.3390/educsci15030288
  22. Nautiyal, V. V., Salvador, E. E. P., Braña, X. R. O., Shastri, R., Singh, V., Tyagi, A., Vidhani, B., & Prasad, V. (2025). Enhancing high school students’ understanding and attitude towards quantum mechanics through discipline-culture framework and cognitive apprenticeship. EPJ Quantum Technology, 12(1), 104. 10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00407-5
  23. Otero, V., Pollock, S., & Finkelstein, N. (2010). A physics department’s role in preparing physics teachers: The Colorado learning assistant model. American Journal of Physics, 78(11), 12181224. 10.1119/1.3471291
  24. Pan, S., Schmucker, R., Bueno, B. G. B., Llanes, S. A., Alarcón, F. A., Zhu, H., Teo, A., & Xia, M. (2025). TutorUp: What if your students were simulated? Training tutors to address engagement challenges in online learning. Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Article 20, 118. 10.1145/3706598.3713589
  25. Piaget, J. (1964). Cognitive development in children: Development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2, 176186. 10.1002/tea.3660020306
  26. Price, S., Wallace, K., Verezub, E., & Sinchenko, E. (2019). Student learning assistants: The journey from learning advice to creating community. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(7), 914928. 10.1080/0309877X.2018.1425379
  27. Rempel, B. P., Snyman, M., King, D., Kariuki, J., & McGinitie, E. G. (2024). Design and implementation of a mentorship course that utilizes senior undergraduate chemistry students as learning assistants in the introductory chemistry laboratory to foster transferable skill development. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(9), 37953804. 10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00315
  28. Sellami, N., Shaked, S., Laski, F. A., Eagan, K. M., & Sanders, E. R. (2017). Implementation of a learning assistant program improves student performance on higher-order assessments. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(4), ar62. 10.1187/cbe.16-12-0341
  29. Shabani, K., Khatib, M., & Ebadi, S. (2010). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development: Instructional implications and teachers’ professional development. English Language Teaching, 3(4), 237248. 10.5539/elt.v3n4p237
  30. Snyder, J. J., Sloane, J. D., Dunk, R. D. P., & Wiles, J. R. (2016). Peer-led team learning helps minority students succeed. PLOS Biology, 14(3), e1002398. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002398
  31. Song, Q., Zheng, Y., Mao, X., Wang, Y., & Zhou, Q. (2025). Epistemic network analysis of novice and expert chemistry teachers’ multimodal questioning and feedback behaviours. International Journal of Science Education, 127. 10.1080/09500693.2025.2586456
  32. Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251296. 10.1023/A:1022193728205
  33. Talanquer, V. (2026). The importance of fostering conceptual reframing in chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 27(2), 693700. 10.1039/D5RP00421G
  34. Vázquez, A. V., McLoughlin, K., Sabbagh, M., Runkle, A. C., Simon, J., Coppola, B. P., & Pazicni, S. (2012). Writing-to-teach: A new pedagogical approach to elicit explanative writing from undergraduate chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(8), 10251031. 10.1021/ed200410k
  35. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  36. Wang, D., Gao, L., Shan, D., Chen, G., Zhang, C., & Kao, B. (2025). When tutors simultaneously instruct students from the primary, middle, and high school levels in online one-on-one tutoring: Investigating the interaction dynamics using AI, ENA, and LSA methods. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 34, 11281142. 10.1007/s10956-024-10154-4
  37. Wass, R., & Golding, C. (2014). Sharpening a tool for teaching: The zone of proximal development. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(6), 671684. 10.1080/13562517.2014.901958
  38. Welch, B. L. (1947). The generalization of ‘student’s’ problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika, 34(1–2), 2835. 10.1093/biomet/34.1-2.28
  39. Wilson, S. B., & Varma-Nelson, P. (2016). Small groups, significant impact: A review of Peer-Led Team Learning research with implications for STEM education researchers and faculty. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(10), 16861702. 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00862
  40. Woodward, A. E., Weiner, M., & Gosser, D. K. Jr. (1993). Problem solving workshops in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(8), 651652. 10.1021/ed070p651.1
  41. Zhang, Y., Xia, X., Zeng, J., Zhang, L., & Guo, C. (2025). Application of the cognitive apprenticeship teaching model in the standardized training of critical care medicine resident physicians: A randomized clinical trial. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 16, 18251833. 10.2147/AMEP.S540031
  42. Zhang, Z., & Bayley, J. G. (2019). Peer learning for university students’ learning enrichment: Perspectives of undergraduate students. Journal of Peer Learning, 12(1), 6174. https://journalofpeerlearning.org/articles/90
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/jopl.158 | Journal eISSN: 2200-2359
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 5
Submitted on: Oct 25, 2025
Accepted on: Apr 5, 2026
Published on: Aug 24, 2026
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Marcus Sambar, Sabrina Paolo, Anne Vázquez, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.