Overall Justice of Organization: from Decision Fairness to Positive Attitude of Employees

Jurgita Lazauskaitė-Zabielskė

doi:10.1515/mosr-2017-0005

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

Overall Justice of Organization: from Decision Fairness to Positive Attitude of Employees

Management of Organizations: Systematic Research

Volume 77 (2017): Issue 1 (June 2017)

By: Jurgita Lazauskaitė-Zabielskė

Open Access

|Jul 2017

Abstract

The paper presents an empirical study aimed at analysing the antecedents and role of perceived overall justice in organization. The results of the study show overall justice to be predicted by perceived fairness of various human resource management decisions, and to be related to attitudes towards job, supervisor, and organization.

References

1. Ambrose, M. L., Schminke, M. (2009). The Role of Overall Justice Judgments in Organizational Justice Research: A Test of Mediation // Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 94, No. 2, p. 491-500. doi: 10.1037/a0013203.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Ambrose, M. L., Wo, D. H., Griffith, M. D. (2015). Overall Justice: Past, Present, and Future / In The Oxford Handbook of Justice in the Workplace, ed. R. S. Cropanzano, M. L. Ambrose - Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 109-132. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199981410.013.5.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Baron, R. M., Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator- Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 51, p. 1173-1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Beugre, C. D., Baron, R. A. (2001). Perceptions of Systemic Justice: The Effects of Distributive, Procedural and Interactional Justice // Journal of Applied Social Psychology. Vol. 21, No. 2, p. 324-339. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb00199.x.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Choi, J. (2008). Event Justice Perceptions and Employees’ Reactions: Perceptions of Social Entity Justice as a Moderator // Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 93, No. 3, p. 513-528. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.513.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. L. H., Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the Millennium: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Research // Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 86, No. 3, p. 425-445. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Colquitt, J. A., Greenberg, J. (2004). Organizational Justice: A Fair Assessment of the State of the Literature / In Organizational Behavior: The State of the Science, ed. J. Greenberg. - Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Colquitt, J. A., Shaw, J. C. (2005). How Should Organizational Justice Be Measured? / In The Handbook of Organizational Justice, ed. J. Greenberg, J. Colquitt. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates, p. 113-152.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Cook, J. D., Hepworth, S. J., Wall, T. D., Warr, P. B. (1981). The Experience of Work. A Compendium and Review of 249 Measures and their Use.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R., Rupp, D. R. (2001). Moral Virtues, Fairness Heuristics, Social Entities, and Other Denizens of Organizational Justice // Journal of Vocational Behavior. Vol. 58, No. 2, p. 164-209. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1791.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Cropanzano, R., Chrobot-Mason, D., Rupp, D. E., Prehar, C. A. (2004). Accountability for Corporate Injustice // Human Resource Management Review. Vol. 14, No. 1, p. 107-133. doi: 0.1016/j.hrmr.2004.02.006.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Cropanzano, R., Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in Organizational Justice: Tunneling through The Maze / In International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, ed. C. L. Cooper and I. T. Robertson. - Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Vol. 12, p. 317-372.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Čekanavičius, V., Murauskas, G. (2004). Statistika ir jos taikymai II. Vilnius: TEV.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. Fields, D. L. (2002). Taking The Measure of Work. a Guide to Validates Scales for Organizational Research and Diagnosis. - Thousand Oaks; London; New Delhi: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781452231143
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. Gilliland, S. W., Paddock, L. (2005). Organizational Justice Across Human Resource Management Decisions // In International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, ed. G. P. Hodgkinson and J. K. Ford - John West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons. Vol. 20, p. 149-177.10.1002/0470029307.ch4
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of Perceived Fairness of Performance Evaluations // Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 71, No. 2, p. 340-342. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.71.2.340.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. Hayes, A. F. (2012). Process: A Versatile Computational Tool for Observed Variable Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Modeling. Internet access: [accessed December 12, 2016].
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. Hollensbe, E. C., Khazanchi, S., Masterson, S. S. (2008). How do I Assess if My Supervisor and Organization are Fair? Identifying the Rules Underlying Entity-Based Justice Perceptions //Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 51, No. 6, p. 1099-1116. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2008.35732600.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Holtz, B. C., Harold, C. M. (2009). Fair Today, Fair Tomorrow? A Longitudinal Investigation ofOverall Justice Perceptions // Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 94, No. 5, p. 1185-1199. doi: 10.1037/a0015900.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. Jones, D. A., Martens, M. L. (2009). The Mediating Role of Overall Fairness and the Moderating Role of Trust Certainty in Justice-Criteria Relationships: The Formation and Use of Fairness Heuristics in The Workplace // Journal of Organizational Behavior. Vol. 30, No. 8, p. 1025-1051. doi: 10.1002/job.577.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. Jones, D. A., Skarlicki, D. P. (2005). The Effects of Overhearing Peers Discuss an Authority’s Reputation for Fairness on Reactions to Subsequent Treatment // Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 90, No. 2, p. 363-372. doi: 10.1037/002190 10. 90.2.363.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
22. Kim, T., Leung, K. (2007). Forming and Reacting to Overall Fairness: A Cross-Cultural Comparison // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. Vol. 104, No. 1, p. 83-95. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.01.004.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
23. Konovsky, M. A., Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship Behavior and Social Exchange // Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 37, No. 3, p. 656-669. doi: 10.2307/256704.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
24. Kray, L. J., Lind, E. A. (2002). The Injustices of Others: Social Reports and The Integration of Others’ Experiences in Organizational Justice Judgments // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. Vol. 89, No. 1, p. 906-924. doi: 10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00035-3.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
25. Kuvaas, B. (2008). An Exploration of How the Employee-Organization Relationship Affects the Linkage Between Perception of Developmental Human Resource Practices and Employee Outcomes // Journal Of Management Studies. Vol. 45, No. 1, p. 1-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00710.x.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
26. Leventhal, G. S. (1976). The Distribution of Rewards and Resources in Groups and Organizations // In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. L. Berkowitz L. and W. Walster - New York: Academic Press. Vol. 9, p. 91-131.10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60059-3
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
27. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What Should Be Done with Equity Theory? // In Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, ed. K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg and R. H. Willis - New York: Plenum, p. 27-55.10.1007/978-1-4613-3087-5_2
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
28. Lind, E. A. (2001). Fairness Heuristic Theory: Justice Judgments as Pivotal Cognitions in Organizational Relations / In Advances in Organizational Justice, ed. J. Greenberg and R. Cropanzano - Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, p. 56-88.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
29. Lind, E. A., Kray, L., Thompson, L. (1998). The Social Construction of Injustice: Fairness Judgments in Response to Own and Others’ Unfair Treatment by Authorities // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. Vol. 75, No. 1, p. 1-22. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2785.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
30. Masterson, S. S., Taylor, M. S. (1996). The Broadening of Procedural Justice: Should Interactional and Procedural Components Be Separate Theories? // Paper presented at the 1996 Academy of Management, Cincinnati.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
31. Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., Porter, L. W. (1979) The Measurement of Organizational Commitment // Journal of Vocational Behavior. Vol. 14, No. 2, p. 224-247. doi: 10.1016/0001-8791(79) 90072-1.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
32. Nicklin, J. M., McNall, L. A., Cerasoli, C. P., Strahan, S. R., Cavanaugh, J. A. (2014). The Role of Overall Organizational Justice Perceptions Within the Four-Dimensional Framework. Social Justice Research. Vol. 27, p. 243-270. doi: 10.1007/s11211-014-0208-4.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
33. Rupp, D. E., Cropanzano, R. (2002). The MediatingEffects of Social Exchange Relationships in Predicting Workplace Outcomes From Multifoci Organizational Justice // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. Vol. 89, No. 1, p. 925-946. doi: 10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00036-5.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
34. Scott, D. (1980). The Causal Relationship Between Trust and The Assessed Value of Management by Objectives // Journal of Management. Vol. 6, No. 2, p. 157-173. doi: 10.1177/014920638000600205.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
35. Shapiro, D. L. (2001). The Death of Justice Theory is Likely if Theorists Neglect the “Wheels” Already Invented and the Voices of The Injustice Victims // Journal of Vocational Behavior. Vol. 58, No. 2, p. 235-242. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1795.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
36. Sheppard, B. H., Lewicki, R. J., Minton, J. W. (1992). Organizational Justice: the Search For Fairness in The Workplace. - New York: Lexington Books/Macmillan.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
37. Tremblay, M., Sire, B., Balkin, D. B. (2000). The Role of Organizational Justice in Pay and Employee Benefit Satisfaction, and its Effects on Work Attitudes // Group and Organization Management. Vol. 25, No. 3, p. 269-290. doi: 10.1177/1059601100253004.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
38. Van den Bos, K., Wilke, H. A. M., Lind, E. A. (1998). When do We Need Procedural Fairness? The Role of Trust in Authority // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 75, No. 6, p. 1449-1458.doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75. 6.1449.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mosr-2017-0005 | Journal eISSN: 2335-8750 | Journal ISSN: 1392-1142

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 81 - 99

Submitted on: Dec 16, 2016

Accepted on: May 31, 2017

Published on: Jul 1, 2017

Published by: Vytautas Magnus University, Faculty of Economics and Management

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

Keywords:

overall justice of organization,

employees’ attitudes,

fairness of human resource management decisions

Related subjects:

Business and economics,

Business management,

Marketing, sales, customer relations,

Management, organization, corporate governance,

Business development, change management, cooperation,

Human resources, labor practice, job and career

© 2017 Jurgita Lazauskaitė-Zabielskė, published by Vytautas Magnus University, Faculty of Economics and Management
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 77 (2017): Issue 1 (June 2017)