References
- Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language acquisition (pp. 259-302). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii.
- Best, J., & Kahn, J.V. (2006). Research in education (tenth ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
- Bowden, C., Latham King, C. & Hudson, J. (2008). American English files. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Bygate, M. (1999). Task as context for the framing, reframing, and unframing of language. System, 27, 33-48. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(98)00048-7
- Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.). Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning and testing (pp. 37-53). London: Longman.
- Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nded.). New York, NY: Longman.
- Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nded.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- D’Ely, R. (2006). A focus on learners’ metacognitive process: The importance of the strategic planning, repetition, strategic planning plus repetition and strategic planning for repetition on L2 oral performance (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Santa Catarina University, Brazil.
- Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Evelyn, S., & Marije, M. (2014). An exploratory study into trade-off effects on complexity, accuracy, and fluency on young learners’ oral task repetition. TESL Canada Journal, 30(4), 23-48.
- Ferrari, S. (2012).A longitudinal study of complexity, accuracy, and fluency variation in second language development. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimension ofL2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in SLA (pp. 227-297). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
- Francis, S. (2003). Input flooding and the acquisition of the Spanish verbs ser and estar for beginning level adult learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana.
- Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Hernandez, T.A. (2008). The effect of explicit instruction and input flood on students’ use of discourse markers on a simulated oral proficiency interview. Hispania, 91, 665-75.
- Izumi, S. (2002). Output, and input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study of ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24,541-577. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102004023
- Jourdenais, R., Ota, M., Stauffer, S., Boyson, B., & Daughty, C.J. (1995). Does textual enhancement promote noticing? In R. Schmidt (Ed.). Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp, 183-216). Honolulu, Hawai'i: University of Hawai'i Press.
- Kim, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2013). The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: What needs to be repeated during task-based instruction? System, 44(3), 829-840. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.08.005
- Krashen, S. (1994).The pleasure hypothesis. In J. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University Roundtable on Language and Linguistics (pp. 299-322). Washington: Georgetown University Press.
- Lee, S.K. (2007). Effects of textual enhancement and topic formality on Korean EFL students’ reading comprehension and learning of passive form. Language Learning, 57, 87-118. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00400.x
- Lee, J.F. (2002). The incidental acquisition of Spanish future morphology through reading in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(1), 55- 80.
- Leow, R.P., Egi, T., Nuevo, A.M., &Tsai, Y.-C. (2003).The roles of textual enhancement and type of linguistic item in adult L2 learners’ comprehension and intake. Applied Language Learning, 13, 1-16.
- Overstreet, M. (1998). Textual enhancement and content familiarity: The focus of learner attention. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 2, 229-259.
- Radwan, A. (2005). The effectiveness of explicit attention to form in language learning. System, 33, 69-87. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.06.007
- Rashtchi, M., & Gharanli, L. (2010). Noticing through input enhancement: Does it affect learning of the conditionals? Journal of Language and Translation, 1(1), 19-27.
- Reinders, H., & Ellis, R. (2009). The effects of two types of input to intake and the acquisition of implicit and explicit knowledge. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Phlip, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp.281-302). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
- Rikhtegar, O., &Gholami, J. (2015). The effect of pre-verses post-presentation input flooding via reading on the young EFL learners’ acquisition of simple past tense. English Language Teaching, 8(3), 80-88. DOI:10.5539/elt.v8n3p80
- Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158.
- Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in structured SLA: Theoretical Bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 154-179.
- Shook, D.J. (1999). What foreign language recalls reveal about the input-to-intake phenomenon? Applied Language Learning, 10, 39-76.
- Simard, D. (2009). Differential effects of textual enhancement formats on intake. System, 37(1), 124-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.06.005
- Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied linguistics, 30(4), 510-532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047
- Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183-207). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Spada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: Review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 30, 73-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800012799
- Tabatabaei, O.,& Yakhabi, M. (2009). The effect of comprehensible input and comprehensible output on the accuracy and complexity of Iranian EFL learner’s oral speech. The Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2, 218-248.
- Trahey, M., & White, L. (1993). Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 181-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011955
- VanPatten, B., Williams, J., & Rott, S. (2004). Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott, & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 1-26). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Vercelloti, M. (2012). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency as properties of language performance: The development of the multiple subsystems over time and in relation to each other. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburgh, NY.
- Wagner-Gough, J., & Hatch, E. (1975). The importance of input in second language acquisition studies. Language Learning 25 (2), 297-308. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1975.tb00248.x
- White, P. (2015). The effects of input-based instructions on the acquisition of Spanish accusative clitics. Hispania, 98(2), 264-284.
- Wong, W. (2003). Textual enhancement and simplified input: Effects on L2 comprehension and acquisition of non-meaningful grammatical form. Applied Language Learning, 13(2), 109-132.
- Wong, W. (2005). Input enhancement: From theory and research to the classroom. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.