References
- Annicchiarico, P. (2007): Inter- and intra-population genetic variation for leaf:stem ratio in landraces and varieties of lucerne. Grass and Forage Science 62, 100–103.
- Aufrère, J. and H. Guérin (1996): Critical review of chemical and enzymatic methods for the estimation of nutritive value in roughages. Annales de Zootechnie 45, 21–38.
- Aufrère, J. and B. Michalet-Doreau (1988): Comparison of methods for predicting digestibility of feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 20, 203–218.
- Ayres, J.F. (1991): Sources of error with in vitro digestibility assay of pasture feeds. Grass and Forage Science 46, 89–97.
- Barber, G.D., Givens, D.I., Kridis, M.S., Offer, N.W. and I. Murray (1990): Prediction of the organic matter digestibility of grass silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology 28, 115–128.
- Casler, M.D. and K.P. Vogel (1999): Accomplishments and impact from breeding for increased forage nutritional value. Crop Science 39, 12–20.
- De Boever, J.L., Cottyn, B.G., Andries, J.I., Buysse, F.X. and J.M. Vanacker (1988): The use of a cellulase technique to predict digestibility, metabolizable and net energy of forages. Animal Feed Science and Technology 19, 247–260.
- Dijkstra, J., Kebreab, E., Bannink, A., France, J. and S. López (2005): Application of the gas production technique to feed evaluation systems for ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology 123–124, 561–578.
- DLG (1997): DLG-Futterwerttabellen für Wiederkäuer (in German). Universität Hohenheim – Dokumentationsstelle, 7. Auflage, DLG-Verlag, Frankfurt, Germany.
- Eickler, B., Gierus, M. and F. Taube (2011): Specific polyphenol oxidase activity of red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) and its relation with forage quality in field experiments. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B — Soil & Plant Science 61, 39–49.
- Gierus, M., Dorland, A.V., Elgersma, A., Kreuzer, M., Loges, R., Pötsch, E.M., Smit, H.J., Steinshamn, H., Taube, F. and M. Wachendorf (2007): Influence of contrasting environments on forage quality of ryegrass and four legumes growing in binary swards. Grassland Science in Europe 12, 162–165.
- Gierus, M., Kleen, J., Loges, R. and F. Taube (2012): Forage legume species determine the nutritional quality of binary mixtures with perennial ryegrass in the first production year. Animal Feed Science and Technology 172, 150–161.
- Givens, D.I., Cottyn, B.G., Dewey, P.J.S. and A. Steg (1995): A comparison of the neutral detergent-cellulase method with other laboratory methods for predicting the digestibility in vivo of maize silages from three European countries. Animal Feed Science and Technology 54, 55–64.
- Givens, D.I., Everington, J.M. and A.H. Adamson (1990): The nutritive value of spring-grown herbage produced on farms throughout England and Wales over 4 years. II. The prediction of apparent digestibility in vivo from various laboratory measurements. Animal Feed Science and Technology 27, 173–184.
- Gosselink, J.M.J., Dulphy, J.P., Poncet, C., Jailler, M., Tamminga, S. and J.W. Cone (2004): Prediction of forage digestibility in ruminants using in situ and in vitro techniques. Animal Feed Science and Technology 115, 227–246.
- Holm, S. (1979): A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6, 65–70.
- Jones, D.I.H. and M.K. Theodorou (2000): Enzyme techniques for estimating digestibility. In: Givens, D.I., Owen, E., Axford, R.F.E. and H.M. Omed (Eds.): Forage evaluation in ruminant nutrition. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, pp. 155–173.
- Jones, B.A., Muck, R.E. and R.D. Hatfield (1995): Red clover extracts inhibit legume proteolysis. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 67, 329–333.
- Kitessa, S., Flinn, P.C. and G.G. Irish (1999): Comparison of methods used to predict the in vivo digestibility of feeds in ruminants. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 825–841.
- Kleen, J., Taube, F. and M. Gierus (2011): Agronomic performance and nutritive value of forage legumes in binary mixtures with perennial ryegrass under different defoliation systems. Journal of Agricultural Science 149, 73–84.
- Krawutschke, M., Kleen, J., Weiher, N., Loges, R., Taube, F. and M. Gierus (2013): Changes in crude protein fractions of forage legumes during the spring growth and summer regrowth period. Journal of Agricultural Science 151, 75–90.
- McDougall, E.I. (1948): Studies of ruminant saliva. The composition and output of sheep’s saliva. Biochemistry Journal 43, 99–109.
- Murray, I. (1986): Near infrared reflectance analysis of forages. In: Haresign, W. and D.J.A. Cole (Eds.): Recent advances in animal nutrition. Butterworth, London, UK, pp. 141–156.
- Nordkvist, E. and P. Åman (1986): Changes during growth in anatomical and chemical composition and in vitro degradability of lucerne. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 37, 1–7.
- SAS Institute Inc. (2004): SAS Software Release 9.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
- Shenk, J.S. and M.O. Westerhaus (1991): Population structuring of near infrared spectra and modified partial least square regression. Crop Science 31, 1548–1555.
- Steg, A., Spoelstra, S.F., Van Der Meer, J.M. and V.A. Hindle (1990): Digestibility of grass silage. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 38, 407–422.
- Steinshamn, H. (2010): Effect of forage legumes on feed intake, milk production and milk quality – A review. Animal Science Papers and Reports 28, 195–206.
- Tilley, J.M.A. and R.A. Terry (1963): A two-stage technique for in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 104–111.
- VDLUFA (German Association of Agricultural Investigation and Research Institutes) (1993): Book of methods [Methodenbuch III, 6.6.1 Cellulasemethode, in German]. VDLUFA-Verlag, Darmstadt, Germany.
- Weissbach, F., Kuhla, S. and L. Schmidt (1996): Estimation of the metabolizable energy in forages by a cellulase method (in German). Proceedings of the Society of Nutrition Physiology 5, 115.