Non-Linear Model-Based Predictive Control For Trajectory Tracking And Control Effort Minimization In A Smartphone-Based Quadrotor

García, Luis; Rosero, Esteban

doi:10.14313/jamris/4-2022/28

Abstract

In this paper, the design and implementation of a nonlinear model-based predictive controller (NMPC) for predefined trajectory tracking and to minimize the control effort of a smartphone-based quadrotor are developed. The optimal control actions are calculated in each iteration by means of an optimal control algorithm based on the non-linear model of the quadrotor, considering some aerodynamic effects. Control algorithm implementation and simulation tests are executed on a smartphone using the CasADi framework. In addition, a technique for estimating the energy consumed based on control signals is presented. NMPC controller performance was compared with other works developed towards the control of quadrotors, based on an H_∞ controller and an LQI controller, and using three predefined trajectories, where the NMPC average tracking error was around 50% lower, and average estimated power and energy consumption slightly higher, with respect to the H_∞ and LQI controllers.

References

A. Banerjee and A. Roychoudhury, “Future of mobile software for smartphones and drones: Energy and performance,” pp. 1–12, 2017.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
J. A. Frank, A. Brill, J. Bae, and V. Kapila, “Exploring the role of a smartphone as a motion sensing and control device in the wireless networked control of a motor test-bed,” in 2015 12th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (ICINCO), 2015, pp. 328–335.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
C. Bodenstein, M. Tremer, J. Overhoff, and R. P. Würtz, “A smartphone-controlled autonomous robot,” in 2015 12th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), 2015, pp. 2314–2321.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
L. Garcia, A. Astudillo, and E. Rosero, “Fast model predictive control on a smartphone-based flight controller,” in 2019 IEEE 4th Colombian Conference on Automatic Control (CCAC), 2019, pp. 1–6.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
N. Kreciglowa, K. Karydis, and V. Kumar, “Energy efficiency of trajectory generation methods for stop-andgo aerial robot navigation,” in 2017 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), 2017, pp. 656–662.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
J. Svacha, K. Mohta, and V. Kumar, “Improving quadrotor trajectory tracking by compensating for aerodynamic effects,” in 2017 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), 2017, pp. 860–866.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
F. Yacef, N. Rizoug, L. Degaa, O. Bouhali, and M. Hamerlain, “Trajectory optimisation for a quadrotor helicopter considering energy consumption,” in 2017 4th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT), 2017, pp. 1030–1035.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Z. Wang, K. Akiyama, K. Nonaka, and K. Sekiguchi, “Experimental verifiication of the model predictive control with disturbance rejection for quadrotors,” in 2015 54th Annual Conference of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan (SICE), 2015, pp. 778–783.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
K. Shimada and T. Nishida, “Particle filter-model predictive control of quadcopters,” in Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Advanced Mechatronic Systems, 2014, pp. 421–424.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
R. Singhal and P. B. Sujit, “3d trajectory tracking for a quadcopter using mpc on a 3d terrain,” in 2015 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), 2015, pp. 1385–1390.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
A. Bemporad and C. Rocchi, “Decentralized linear timevarying model predictive control of a formation of unmanned aerial vehicles,” in 2011 50th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference, 2011, pp. 7488–7493.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
M. E. Guerrero-Sanchez, H. Abaunza, P. Castillo, R. Lozano, and C. D. Garcýìa-Beltraìn, “Quadrotor energy-based control laws: A unit-quaternion approach,” Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, no. 2, pp. 347–377, 2017.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
J. CarinÞo, H. Abaunza, and P. Castillo, “Quadrotor quaternion control,” in 2015 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), 2015, pp. 825–831.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
W. Dong, G.- Y. Gu, X. Zhu, and H. Ding, “Modeling and control of a quadrotor uav with aerodynamic concepts,” International Journal of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, no. 5, pp. 901–906, 2013.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
A. Chovancovaì, T. Fico, L. Chovanec, and P. Hubinsk, “Mathematical modelling and parameter identification of quadrotor (a survey),” Procedia Engineering, pp. 172–181, 2014.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
T. T. Ribeiro, A. G. Conceiçao, I. Sa, and P. Corke, “Nonlinear model predictive formation control for quadcopters,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, no. 19, pp. 39–44, 2015.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
M. Neunert, C. De Crousaz, F. Furrer, M. Kamel, F. Farshidian, R. Siegwart, and J. Buchli, “Fast nonlinear model predictive control for unified trajectory optimization and tracking,” in 2016 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2016, pp. 1398–1404.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
A. Astudillo, B. Bacca, and E. Rosero, “Optimal and robust controllers design for a smartphone-based quadrotor,” in 2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control (CCAC), 2017, pp. 1–6.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Non-Linear Model-Based Predictive Control For Trajectory Tracking And Control Effort Minimization In A Smartphone-Based Quadrotor

Abstract

Paradigm

My account