Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
High-Performance Electric Two-Wheeler Fast Charger Based on Intelligent Control Algorithm Cover

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Charger application

Figure 2.

Proposed charger architecture

Figure 3.

Charging Algorithm

Figure 4.

(a) Charging control block, (b) PWM generator

Figure 5.

Fuzzy membership function (a) input error and Δerror, (b) input SoC, (c) Output

Figure 6.

The comparison of charging voltage characteristics

Figure 7.

Charging time performance

Figure 8.

Hardware experimental setup

Figure 9.

Hardware implementation of the proposed charging topology

Figure 10.

Three phases interleaved PWM signal result 3OKhz

Figure 11.

Charger input voltage

Figure 12.

Charger output voltage

The charging current characteristics of the proposed algorithm

SoC (%)Peak Current (A)Average Charging Current (A)C-RateCharging Voltage (V)
013100.584
202420184
402320184
602220184
8015100.584
10000084

The fuzzy rule for medium SoC level

SoC: Mediumerror
NBNZPPB
Δ errorNBPBPBPBPBPB
NPBPBPBPBPB
ZPBPBPBPBPB
PPBPBPBPBPB
PBPBPBPBPBPB

The charger hardware implementation parameters

ParameterValue
RMS Input Voltage220-230V 50Hz (AC)
Voltage Input30 V
Current Input0.4 A
Power Input12 W
Voltage Output21 V
Current Output0.564 A
Output Capacitor100 uF
Inductor60 uH
Switching DeviceMOSFET
Switching Frequency30 kHz
Battery Array5 series 1 parallel
Power Output11.85 W
Charger Efficiency98.8 %

The fuzzy rule for high SoC level

SoC: Higherror
NBNZPPB
Δ errorNBNBNBNBNBNB
NNBNBNBNBN
ZNBNBNBNBN
PNBNBNBNN
PBNBNBNNN

Comparison between the proposed method and previous methods

Ref.YearConverter TypeAlgorithmEfficiency (%)Charging Time 0-100% SoC (min)
[27]2012BoostNeural Network97.885
[28]2018FlybackPSO94.2100
[29]2019Quasi-ResonantHysteresis Control97.570
[15]2020CukDCM-120
[30]2020Buck-BoostFLC95.590
[31]2021SEPICPID92.3110
[32]2022Interleaved BoostFLC98.565
[17]2023BuckANFIS-175
[33]2023ZetaSliding Mode Control98.180
[34]2024LLCGA96.795
[35]2024Dual Active BridgeMPC97.975
Proposed20253-Phase IBCPI-FLC98.857.75

The fuzzy rule for low SoC level

SoC: Lowerror
NBNZPPB
Δ errorNBZZZZZ
NZNNZP
ZZZZPPB
PZZPPBPB
PBZPPBPBPB

The charger simulation parameters

ParameterValue
RMS Input Voltage220-230V 50Hz (AC)
AC Transformator1:2
Rectifier2 kW
Switching deviceMOSFET N-type Rd = 0.01 Ω Rs = 1e5 Ω
Inductor Ls1e-3H
Capacitor output CO200e-6F
Voltage output Vo48-84V
Output current io0-20A
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14313/jamris-2026-030 | Journal eISSN: 2080-2145 | Journal ISSN: 1897-8649
Language: English
Page range: 175 - 184
Submitted on: Aug 26, 2024
Accepted on: Feb 17, 2025
Published on: Jun 25, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Subiyanto, Rizky Ajie Aprilianto, Mario Norman Syah, Bagaskoro Saputro, Abdurrakhman Hamid Al-Azhari, Nektar Cahayasabda, Bayu Adi Pambudi, Faiq Mananul Faqih, Icha Arifah Annisa, Dwi Bagas Nugroho, Siva Khaaifina Rachmat, Dewi Anggriani, published by Łukasiewicz Research Network – Industrial Research Institute for Automation and Measurements PIAP
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.