Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Joining the meta-research movement: A bibliometric case study of the journal Perspectives on Medical Education Cover

Joining the meta-research movement: A bibliometric case study of the journal Perspectives on Medical Education

Open Access
|Jun 2022

References

  1. Ioannidis JPI Why most published research findings are false PLoS Med 2005 2 e124 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
  2. Ioannidis JPI Meta-research: why research on research matters PLoS Biol 2018 16 e2005468 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005468
  3. Peterson D, Panofsky A. Metascience as a scientific social movement. Version 1. SocArXiv. 2020. https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/4dsqa/. Accessed 3 Feb 2022.
  4. Fanelli D How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data Plos One 2009 4 e5738 10.1371/journal.pone.0005738
  5. Marusic A Wager E Utrobicic A Rothstein HR Sambunjak D Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016 10.1002/14651858.MR000038.pub2
  6. Artino AR Jr Driessen EW Maggio LA Ethical shades of gray: international frequency of scientific misconduct and questionable research practices in health professions education Acad Med 2019 94 76 84 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002412
  7. Lee CJ Sugimoto CR Zhang G Cronin B Bias in peer review J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 2013 64 2 17 10.1002/asi.22784
  8. Maggio LA Bynum WE Schreiber-Gregory DN Durning SJ Artino AR When will I get my paper back? A replication study of publication timelines for health professions education research Perspect Med Educ 2020 9 139 146 10.1007/s40037-020-00576-2
  9. Himmelstein D. The history of publishing delays. Satoshi Village: the blog of Daniel Himmelstein. 2016. https://blog.dhimmel.com/history-of-delays/. Accessed 3 Feb 2022.
  10. Piwowar H Priem J Larivière V The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles Peer J 2018 6 e4375 10.7717/peerj.4375
  11. BMJ. Evidence based publishing.. https://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/evidence-based-publishing. Accessed 3 Feb 2022.
  12. PLOS.. https://plos.org/about/. Accessed 3 Feb 2022.
  13. Otlet P Traité de documentation. Le Livre sur le Livre: Théorie et Pratique 1934 Bruxelles Editions Mundaneum https://archive.org/details/OtletTraitDocumentationUgent
  14. Garfield E Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas Science 1955 122 108 111 10.1126/science.122.3159.108
  15. Sugimoto CR Larivière V Measuring research: what everyone needs to know 2018 New York Oxford University Press 10.1093/wentk/9780190640118.001.0001
  16. Demografix ApS.. https://genderize.io/. Accessed 3 Feb 2022.
  17. Hornstein P Tuyishime H Mutebi M Lasebikan N Rubagumya F Fadelu T Authorship equity and gender representation in global oncology publications JCO Glob Oncol 2022 8 e2100369 10.1200/GO.21.00369
  18. Bhatia S Cotton CC Kim E Gender and nationality trends in manuscripts published in prominent gastroenterology journals between 1997 and 2017 Dig Dis Sci 2022 67 367 376 10.1007/s10620-021-07021-2
  19. Maggio LA Ninkov A Costello JA Driessen EW Artino AR Jr Knowledge syntheses in medical education: meta-research examining author gender, geographic location, and institutional affiliation PLoS ONE 2021 16 e0258925 10.1371/journal.pone.0258925
  20. Google Google sheets 2022 Mountain View Google
  21. Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft Excel. Version 16.59. 2022. https://office.microsoft.com/excel. Accessed 1 June 2022.
  22. van Eck NJ, Waltman L. VOSViewer: Visualizing Scientific Landscapes. 2010. https://www.vosviewer.com. Accessed 1 June 2022.
  23. Maggio LA Haustein S Costello JA Driessen EW Artino AR Jr Perspectives on medical education J Data Suppl Files 2022 10.5281/zenodo.6463805
  24. Varpio L Nagler A Perspectives on Medical Education Special Edition : Lessons learned from health professions education scholarship failures surprises Perspect Med Educ 2017 6 139 140 10.1007/s40037-017-0355-z
  25. Maggio LA Costello JA Norton C Driessen EW Artino AR Jr Knowledge syntheses in medical education: a bibliometric analysis Perspect Med Educ 2021 10 79 87 10.1007/s40037-020-00626-9
  26. Maggio LA Costello JA Ninkov A Frank JR Artino AR Jr. The voices of medical education science: describing the published landscape 2022 10.1101/2022.02.10.479930
  27. Madden C O’Malley R O’Connor P O’Dowd E Byrne D Lydon S Gender in authorship and editorship in medical education journals: a bibliometric review Med Educ 2021 55 678 688 10.1111/medu.14427
  28. Thomas EG Jayabalasingham B Collins T Geertzen J Bui C Dominici F Gender disparities in invited commentary authorship in 2459 medical journals JAMA Netw Open 2019 2 e1913682 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.13682
  29. Teunissen PW Atherley A Cleland JJ Advancing the science of health professions education through a shared understanding of terminology: a content analysis of terms for “faculty” Perspect Med Educ 2022 11 22 27 10.1007/s40037-021-00683-8
  30. Van Noorden R Open access: The true cost of science publishing [published correction appears in Nature. 2013;496:151] [published correction appears in Nature. 2013;499:19 Nature 2013 495 426 429 10.1038/495426a
  31. Ajjawi R Crampton PES Ginsburg S Promoting inclusivity in health professions education publishing Med Educ 2022 56 252 256 10.1111/medu.14724
  32. Kusurkar RA The leaky pipeline of publications and knowledge generation in medical education Perspect Med Educ 2022 11 70 72 10.1007/s40037-022-00700-4
  33. Public Knowledge Project. Statistics.. https://docs.pkp.sfu.ca/admin-guide/en/statistics. Accessed 27 Mar 2022.
  34. Neubauer Neubauer, et al. How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others Perspect Med Educ 2019 8 90 97 10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2
  35. Varpio Varpio. Using rhetorical appeals to credibility, logic, and emotions to increase your persuasiveness Perspect Med Educ 2018 7 207 210 10.1007/s40037-018-0420-2
  36. Artino Artino. Academic self-efficacy: from educational theory to instructional practice Perspect Med Educ 2012 1 76 85 10.1007/s40037-012-0012-5
  37. Lefroy Lefroy, et al. Guidelines: the do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education Perspect Med Educ 2015 4 284 299 10.1007/s40037-015-0231-7
  38. Peters Peters, et al. Bedside teaching in medical education: a literature review Perspect Med Educ 2014 3 76 88 10.1007/s40037-013-0083-y
  39. Kamphuis Kamphuis. Augmented reality in medical education? Perspect Med Educ 2014 3 300 311 10.1007/s40037-013-0107-7
  40. Kogan Kogan. Guidelines: The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of direct observation of clinical skills in medical education Perspect Med Educ 2017 6 286 305 10.1007/s40037-017-0376-7
  41. Leppink Leppink. The evolution of cognitive load theory and its application to medical education Perspect Med Educ 2015 4 119 127 10.1007/s40037-015-0192-x
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 15, 2022
|
Accepted on: May 13, 2022
|
Published on: Jun 21, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Lauren A. Maggio, Stefanie Haustein, Joseph A. Costello, Erik W. Driessen Driessen, Anthony R. Artino, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.