References
- Peterson DAM Dear reviewer 2: Go f’ yourself Soc Sci Q 2020 101 4 1648 1652 10.1111/ssqu.12824
- Shit my reviewers say.. n. d.. https://shitmyreviewerssay.tumblr.com/. Accessed 29 Jan 2021.
- Hyland K Jiang FK “This work is antithetical to the spirit of research”: an anatomy of harsh peer reviews J Engl Acad Purp 2020 46 100867 10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100867
- Silbiger NJ Stubler AD Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM PeerJ 2019 7 e8247 10.7717/peerj.8247
- Smith R. Peer reviewers—time for a mass rebellion? 2021. https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/02/01/richard-smith-peer-reviewers-time-for-mass-rebellion/. Accessed 14 Feb 2021, The BMJ Opinion.
- Lefroy J Watling C Teunissen PW Brand P Guidelines on feedback for clinical education: the dos, don’ts, and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education Perspect Med Educ 2015 4 6 284 299 10.1007/s40037-015-0231-7
- Hattie J Timperley H The power of feedback Rev Educ Res 2007 77 1 81 112 10.3102/003465430298487
- Lingard L The academic hedge, part 1: modal tuning in your research writing Perspect Med Educ 2020 9 2 107 110 10.1007/s40037-019-00559-y
- Hyland K Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge Talk Text 1998 18 3 349 382
- Brown P Levinson SC Politeness: some universals in language usage 1987 London Cambridge University Press 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
- Peebles E Scandlyn M Hesp BR A retrospective study investigating requests for self-citation during open peer review in a general medicine journal Plos One 2020 15 8 e0237804 10.1371/journal.pone.0237804