Don’t be reviewer&nbsp;2! Reflections on writing effective peer review comments

Chris Watling; Shiphra Ginsburg; Lorelei Lingard

doi:10.1007/S40037-021-00670-Z

Abstract

None

References

Peterson DAM Dear reviewer 2: Go f’ yourself Soc Sci Q 2020 101 4 1648 1652 10.1111/ssqu.12824
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shit my reviewers say.. n. d.. https://shitmyreviewerssay.tumblr.com/. Accessed 29 Jan 2021.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hyland K Jiang FK “This work is antithetical to the spirit of research”: an anatomy of harsh peer reviews J Engl Acad Purp 2020 46 100867 10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100867
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Silbiger NJ Stubler AD Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM PeerJ 2019 7 e8247 10.7717/peerj.8247
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Smith R. Peer reviewers—time for a mass rebellion? 2021. https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/02/01/richard-smith-peer-reviewers-time-for-mass-rebellion/. Accessed 14 Feb 2021, The BMJ Opinion.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lefroy J Watling C Teunissen PW Brand P Guidelines on feedback for clinical education: the dos, don’ts, and don’t knows of feedback for clinical education Perspect Med Educ 2015 4 6 284 299 10.1007/s40037-015-0231-7
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hattie J Timperley H The power of feedback Rev Educ Res 2007 77 1 81 112 10.3102/003465430298487
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lingard L The academic hedge, part 1: modal tuning in your research writing Perspect Med Educ 2020 9 2 107 110 10.1007/s40037-019-00559-y
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hyland K Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge Talk Text 1998 18 3 349 382
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brown P Levinson SC Politeness: some universals in language usage 1987 London Cambridge University Press 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peebles E Scandlyn M Hesp BR A retrospective study investigating requests for self-citation during open peer review in a general medicine journal Plos One 2020 15 8 e0237804 10.1371/journal.pone.0237804
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Don’t be reviewer 2! Reflections on writing effective peer review comments

Abstract

Paradigm

My account