References
- Voorhees RA Competency-based learning models: a necessary future. New directions for institutional research New Dir Inst Res 2001 110 5 13
- Konopasek L Norcini J Krupat E Focusing on the formative: building an assessment system aimed at student growth and development Acad Med 2016 91 11 1492 1497 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001171
- Holmboe ES Sherbino J Long DM Swing SR Frank JR Collaborators IC The role of assessment in competency-based medical education Med Teach 2010 32 8 676 682 10.3109/0142159X.2010.500704
- Warm EJ Englander R Pereira A Barach P Improving learner handovers in medical education Acad Med 2017 92 7 927 931 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001457
- Humphrey-Murto S LeBlanc A Touchie C The influence of prior performance information on ratings of current performance and implications for learner handover: a scoping review Acad Med 2019 94 7 1050 1057 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002731
- Frellsen SL Baker EA Papp KK Durning SJ Medical school policies regarding struggling medical students during the internal medicine clerkships: results of a national survey Acad Med 2008 83 9 876 881 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318181da98
- Cox SM “Forward feeding” about students’ progress: information on struggling medical students should not be shared among clerkship directors or with students’ current teachers Acad Med 2008 83 9 801 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318181cfe6
- Cleary L “Forward feeding” about students’ progress: the case for longitudinal, progressive, and shared assessment of medical students Acad Med 2008 83 9 800 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318181cfbc
- Gold WL McArdle P Federman DD Should medical school faculty see assessments of students made by previous teachers? Acad Med 2002 77 11 1096 1100 10.1097/00001888-200211000-00006
- Kassam A Ruetalo M Topps M Key stakeholder opinions for a national learner education handover BMC Med Educ 2019 19 1 150 10.1186/s12909-019-1598-7
- Cohen GS Blumberg P Investigating whether teachers should be given assessments of students made by previous teachers Acad Med 1991 66 5 288 289 10.1097/00001888-199105000-00013
- Hemmer PA Durning SJ Papp K What are the discussion topics and usefulness of clerkship directors’ meetings within medical schools? A report from the CDIM 2007 national survey Acad Med 2010 85 12 1855 1861 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181fa2de7
- Mims LD DeCastro AO Kelly AG Perspectives of family medicine clerkship directors regarding forward feeding: a CERA study Fam Med 2017 49 9 699 705
- Pangaro L “Forward feeding” about students’ progress: more information will enable better policy Acad Med 2008 83 9 802 803 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318181d025
- Dory V Gomez-Garibello C Cruess R Cruess S Cummings BA Young M The challenges of detecting progress in generic competencies in the clinical setting Med Educ 2018 52 12 1259 1270 10.1111/medu.13749
- Cleland JA Knight LV Rees CE Tracey S Bond CM Is it me or is it them? Factors that influence the passing of underperforming students Med Educ 2008 42 8 800 809 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03113.x
- Dory V Danoff D Plotnick LH Does educational handover influence subsequent assessment? Acad Med 2020 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003528
- Schmitz C. LimeSurvey: an open source survey tool. LimeSurvey Project Hamburg, Germany. 2012. http://www.limesurvey.org. Accessed 14 July 2020.
- Sandelowski M Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health 2000 23 4 334 340 10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<;334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
- Vaismoradi M Turunen H Bondas T Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study Nurs Health Sci 2013 15 3 398 405 10.1111/nhs.12048
- Hsieh H-F Shannon SE Three approaches to qualitative content analysis Qual Health Res 2005 15 9 1277 1288 10.1177/1049732305276687
- Pope C Ziebland S Mays N Pope C Mays N Analysing qualitative data Qualitative research in health care 2006 3 Oxford/United-Kingdom BMJ Books 63 81 10.1002/9780470750841.ch7
- Basit T Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis Educ Res 2003 45 2 143 154 10.1080/0013188032000133548
- Crowe M Inder M Porter R Conducting qualitative research in mental health: thematic and content analyses Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2015 49 7 616 623 10.1177/0004867415582053
- Monrouxe LV Rees CE When I say … quantification in qualitative research Med Educ 2020 54 3 186 187 10.1111/medu.14010
- Govaerts MJ van der Vleuten CP Holmboe ES Managing tensions in assessment: moving beyond either—or thinking Med Educ 2019 53 1 64 75 10.1111/medu.13656
- Norcini J Anderson MB Bollela V 2018 Consensus framework for good assessment Med Teach 2018 40 11 1102 1109 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1500016
- Lockyer J Carraccio C Chan M-K Core principles of assessment in competency-based medical education Med Teach 2017 39 6 609 616 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315082
- Schuwirth LW Van der Vleuten CP Programmatic assessment: from assessment of learning to assessment for learning Med Teach 2011 33 6 478 485 10.3109/0142159X.2011.565828
- van der Vleuten CP Schuwirth L Driessen E A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose Med Teach 2012 34 3 205 214 10.3109/0142159X.2012.652239
- Conference of Postgraduate Medical Deans (COPMeD). A Reference Guide for Postgraduate Speciality Training in the UK (7th edition). 2018. https://www.copmed.org.uk/images/docs/gold_guide_7th_edition/The_Gold_Guide_7th_Edition_January__2018.pdf. Accessed 25 Sept 2019.
- Colbert CY Dannefer EF French JC Clinical competency committees and assessment: changing the conversation in graduate medical education J Grad Med Educ 2015 7 2 162 165 10.4300/JGME-D-14-00448.1
- LaDonna KA Taylor T Lingard L Why open-ended survey questions are unlikely to support rigorous qualitative insights Acad Med 2018 93 3 347 349 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002088
- Pal N Young M Danoff D Teachers’ mindsets in medical education: a pilot survey of clinical supervisors Med Teach 2020 42 3 291 298 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1679359
- Eden D Leadership and expectations: Pygmalion effects and other self-fulfilling prophecies in organizations Leadersh Q 1992 3 4 271 305 10.1016/1048-9843(92)90018-B
- Babad EY Some correlates of teachers’ expectancy bias Am Educ Res J 1985 22 2 175 183 10.3102/00028312022002175
- Reilly SP Smither JW Warech MA Reilly RR The influence of indirect knowledge of previous performance on ratings of present performance: the effects of job familiarity and rater training J Bus Psychol 1998 12 4 421 435 10.1023/A:1025098905241
- Smither JW Reilly RR Buda R Effect of prior performance information on ratings of present performance: contrast versus assimilation revisited J Appl Psychol 1988 73 3 487 10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.487
- Shaw TW, Wood TJ, Touchie C, Pugh D, Humphrey-Murto SM. How biased are you? The effect of prior performance information on attending physician ratings and implications for learner handover. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-020-09979-6.