Perils, pitfalls and potential for the use of reporting guidelines in experimental research in medical education

Alice Moult; Peter Yeates

doi:10.1007/S40037-019-00526-7

Abstract

None

References

1.
Kremer T Mamede S Van den Broek WW Schmidt HG Nunes MPT Martins MA Influence of negative emotions on residents’ learning of scientific information: an experimental study Perspect Med Educ 2019

Back to article
2.
Yeates P Woolf K Benbow E Davies B Boohan M Eva K A randomised trial of the influence of racial stereotype bias on examiners’ scores, feedback and recollections in undergraduate clinical exams Bmc Med 2017 15 1 179 10.1186/s12916-017-0943-0

Back to article
3.
Moher D Hopewell S Schulz KF CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials J Clin Epidemiol 2010 63 e1 37 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.004

Back to article
4.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals 2018

Back to article
5.
American Psychological Association Reporting standards for research in psychology: Why do we need them? What might they be? Am Psychol 2008 63 839 851 10.1037/0003-066X.63.9.839

Back to article
6.
Duran RP Eisenhart MA Erickson FD Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications: American Educational Research Association Educ Res 2006 35 33 40

Back to article
7.
Hammersley M The issue of quality in qualitative research Int J Res Meth Educ 2007 30 287 305 10.1080/17437270701614782

Back to article
8.
Guest G MacQueen KM Reevaluating guidelines in qualitative research. Handbook for team-based qualitative research 2008 Plymouth AltaMira 205 226

Back to article

Perils, pitfalls and potential for the use of reporting guidelines in experimental research in medical education

Abstract

Paradigm

My account