Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The effect of constructing versus solving virtual patient cases on transfer of learning: a randomized trial Cover

The effect of constructing versus solving virtual patient cases on transfer of learning: a randomized trial

Open Access
|Jan 2016

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1

Flowchart of the study. Participants were randomized to VP-construction or VP-solving

40037_2015_242_Fig1_HTML.gif

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of study group participants randomized to constructing (VP-construction) or solving (VP-solving) VP cases. There were no differences in any of the baseline characteristics between the two groups

Group

VP-solving (n = 20)

VP-construction (n = 19)

Age, median (range) years

24 (22–32)

23 (21–29)

Gender

Male

50 % (10/20)

37 % (7/19)

Female

50 % (10/20)

63 % (12/19)

How much time do you use computers/tablets/smartphones (not for text messages or talking)/per day?

< 1 h

15 % (3/20)

32 % (6/19)

1–2 h

50 % (10/20)

37 % (7/19)

2–5 h

25 % (5/20)

26 % (5/19)

> 5 h

10 % (2/20)

5 % (1/19)

Have you previously used computer-based education?

Yes

55 % (11/20)

42 % (8/19)

No

45 % (9/20)

58 % (11/19)

Time from pre-test MRQ to post-test MRQ and transfer test, mean (SD) days

7.3 (1.7)

7.0 (1.4)

Use of learning materials during VP practice

Textbooks

79 % (15/19)

95 % (18/19)

Online practice guidelines

16 % (3/19)

16 % (3/19)

Google, Wikipedia or Youtube

58 % (11/19)

32 % (6/19)

Government-supported webpages

42 % (8/19)

37 % (7/19)

Lecture or study notes

11 % (2/19)

11 % (2/19)

Table 2

Transfer test RIME scores and pre/post-test MRQ scores of students randomized to constructing (VP-construction) or solving (VP-solving) VP cases

Group

VP-solving (n = 20)

VP-construction (n = 19)

Effect size (Cohen’s D, 95 % CI)

Reporter

65.8 % (SD 12.0)

65.9 % (SD 10.8)

0.01 (− 0.62 to 0.64)

Interpreter

66.4 % (SD 17.4)

68.4 % (SD 16.7)

0.12 (− 0.51 to 0.74)

Manager

60.4 % (SD 15.2)

62.5 % (SD 13.4)

0.15 (− 0.49 to 0.77)

Educator

43.3 % (SD 22.0)

45.5 % (SD 15.7)

0.11 (− 0.52 to 0.74)

RIME score (total)

59.1 % (SD 12.8)

60.8 % (SD 11.5)

0.14 (− 0.70 to 0.55)

MRQ pre-test score

58.9 % (SD 7.0)

58.4 (SD 6.1)

0.08 (− 0.70 to 0.55)

MRQ post-test score

61.4 % (SD 5.2)

62.6 % (SD 5.7)

− 0.22 (− 0.41 to 0.85)

Fig. 2

Time spent working with the VPs in the two groups of students, who constructed (VP-construction) or solved (VP-solving) four VP cases

40037_2015_242_Fig2_HTML.gif

Language: English
Published on: Jan 11, 2016
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2016 Martin G. Tolsgaard, Rikke M.H.G. Jepsen, Maria B. Rasmussen, Lars Kayser, Uno Fors, Lars C. Laursen, Jesper H. Svendsen, Charlotte Ringsted, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.