Have a personal or library account? Click to login
What is more effective: a daily or a weekly formative test? Cover

What is more effective: a daily or a weekly formative test?

Open Access
|Mar 2015

References

  1. Karpicke JD Roediger HL The critical importance of retrieval for learning Science 2008 319 966 8 10.1126/science.1152408 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhslOmt7Y%3D 18276894
  2. Roediger HL Karpicke JD Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention Psychol Sci 2006 17 249 55 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x 16507066
  3. Karpicke JD Roediger HL Repeated retrieval during learning is the key to long-term retention J Mem Lang 2007 57 151 62 10.1016/j.jml.2006.09.004
  4. Larsen DP Butler AC Roediger HL Test-enhanced learning in medical education Med Educ 2008 42 959 66 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03124.x 18823514
  5. Kerfoot BP DeWolf WC Masser BA Church PA Federman DD Spaced education improves the retention of clinical knowledge by medical students: a randomized controlled trial Med Educ 2007 41 23 31 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02644.x 17209889
  6. Rolfe I McPherson J. Formative assessment: how am I doing? Lancet 1995 345 837 39 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)92968-1 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3gs1Shsg%3D%3D 7898233
  7. Chan JCK Long-term effects of testing on the recall of nontested materials Memory 2010 18 49 57 10.1080/09658210903405737 19953422
  8. Butler AC Karpicke JD Roediger HL Correcting a metacognitive error: feedback enhances retention of low confidence correct responses J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2008 34 918 28 10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.918 18605878
  9. Tanck E Hannink G van Kuppeveld SM Bolhuis S Kooloos JG The use of daily questions for educational purposes: a TOPday for students Perspect Med Educ 2013 2 162 4 10.1007/s40037-013-0052-5 3722374
  10. Kibble J. Use of unsupervised online quizzes as formative assessment in a medical physiology course: effects of incentives on student participation and performance Adv Physiol Educ 2007 31 253 60 10.1152/advan.00027.2007 17848591
  11. Logan JM Thompson AJ Marshak DW Testing to enhance retention in human anatomy Anat Sci Educ 2011 4 243 8 10.1002/ase.250 3172386 21805688
  12. Pyc MA Rawson KA Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis: does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory J Mem Lang 2009 60 437 47 10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.004
  13. Crowder R. The effects of repetition. In: Principles of learning and Memory, pp. 264–321. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1976.
  14. Landauer TK, Bjork RA. Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning. In: Practical Aspects of Memory, pp. 625–32. London: Academic Press; 1987.
  15. Balota DA Duchek JM Sergent-Marshall SD Roediger HL Does expanded retrieval produce benefits over equal interval spacing? Explorations of spacing effects in healthy aging and early stage Alzheimer’s disease Psych Aging 2006 21 19 31 10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.19
  16. Logan JM Balota DA Expanded vs. equal interval spaced retrieval practice: exploration of schedule of spacing and retention interval in younger and older adults Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 2008 15 3 257 80 10.1080/13825580701322171
  17. Karpicke JD Roediger HL Expanding retrieval practice promotes short-term retention, but equally spaced retrieval enhances long-term retention J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2007 33 704 19 10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.704 17576148
  18. Kane MT Crooks TJ Cohen AS Designing and evaluating standard-setting procedures for licensure and certification tests Adv Health Sci Educ 1999 4 195 207 10.1023/A:1009849528247
  19. Bernard H Thayer JD Streeter EA Diligence and academic performance J Res Christ Educ 1993 2 213 34 10.1080/10656219309484785
  20. The effect of student diligence, diligence support systems, self-efficacy, and locus of control on academic achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Tennessee State University, 2007.
  21. Heffler B. Individual learning style and the learning style inventory Educ Stud 2001 27 307 16 10.1080/03055690120076583
  22. Bernard H Schuttenberg EM Development of the diligence inventory-higher education form J Res Dev Educ 1995 28 91 100
  23. Barrow M Reilly B Woodfield R. The determinants of undergraduate degree performance: how important is gender? Br Educ Res J 2009 35 575 97 10.1080/01411920802642322
  24. Bruinsma M Jansen EPWA When will I succeed in my first-year diploma? Survival analysis in Dutch higher education High Educ Res Dev 2009 28 99 114 10.1080/07294360802444396
  25. Masui C Broeckmans J Doumen S Groenen A Molenberghs G. Do diligent students perform better? Complex relations between student and course characteristics, study time, and academic performance in higher education Stud High Educ 2014 39 621 43 10.1080/03075079.2012.721350
  26. Evans DJR Zeun P Stanier RA Motivating student learning using a formative assessment J Anat 2014 224 296 303 10.1111/joa.12117 24111930
Language: English
Published on: Mar 31, 2015
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2015 Leonieke N. Palmen, Marc A.T.M. Vorstenbosch, Esther Tanck, Jan G.M. Jan G.M. Kooloos, published by Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.