What is more effective: a daily or a weekly formative test?

Leonieke N. Palmen; Marc A.T.M. Vorstenbosch; Esther Tanck; Jan G.M. Jan G.M. Kooloos

doi:10.1007/S40037-015-0178-8

Abstract

Background Exams in anatomy courses are traditionally summative. Formative testing induces retrieval practice, provides feedback and enhances learning results. We investigated the optimal frequency for retrieval practice during an anatomy course.

Method During a first-year course, students were offered four online daily quizzes a week that assessed thoracic anatomy. Once a week they received a quiz about abdominal anatomy. Students immediately received feedback afterwards. In the fourth course week, a survey about participation and satisfaction was taken. 424 students participated in the final summative exam. Trunk wall questions were used as a control. Relationship between participation and test results was investigated with a one-way ANOVA.

Results More frequent participation in formative tests was correlated to higher scores in the summative exam with no difference between daily and weekly quizzes. This effect was found for thorax-abdomen and ‘control’ trunk wall questions. Participation in weekly quizzes was higher (p < 0.001). All survey responses showed a significant difference in favour of the weekly quiz (p < 0.001).

Discussion and conclusion Participation in formative quizzes was correlated to summative exam scores. This correlation was not specific for the material tested, probably because of diligence. Student participation and preference were much higher in weekly quizzes.

References

Karpicke JD Roediger HL The critical importance of retrieval for learning Science 2008 319 966 8 10.1126/science.1152408 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhslOmt7Y%3D 18276894
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Roediger HL Karpicke JD Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention Psychol Sci 2006 17 249 55 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x 16507066
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Karpicke JD Roediger HL Repeated retrieval during learning is the key to long-term retention J Mem Lang 2007 57 151 62 10.1016/j.jml.2006.09.004
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Larsen DP Butler AC Roediger HL Test-enhanced learning in medical education Med Educ 2008 42 959 66 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03124.x 18823514
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kerfoot BP DeWolf WC Masser BA Church PA Federman DD Spaced education improves the retention of clinical knowledge by medical students: a randomized controlled trial Med Educ 2007 41 23 31 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02644.x 17209889
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rolfe I McPherson J. Formative assessment: how am I doing? Lancet 1995 345 837 39 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)92968-1 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3gs1Shsg%3D%3D 7898233
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chan JCK Long-term effects of testing on the recall of nontested materials Memory 2010 18 49 57 10.1080/09658210903405737 19953422
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Butler AC Karpicke JD Roediger HL Correcting a metacognitive error: feedback enhances retention of low confidence correct responses J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2008 34 918 28 10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.918 18605878
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tanck E Hannink G van Kuppeveld SM Bolhuis S Kooloos JG The use of daily questions for educational purposes: a TOPday for students Perspect Med Educ 2013 2 162 4 10.1007/s40037-013-0052-5 3722374
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kibble J. Use of unsupervised online quizzes as formative assessment in a medical physiology course: effects of incentives on student participation and performance Adv Physiol Educ 2007 31 253 60 10.1152/advan.00027.2007 17848591
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Logan JM Thompson AJ Marshak DW Testing to enhance retention in human anatomy Anat Sci Educ 2011 4 243 8 10.1002/ase.250 3172386 21805688
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pyc MA Rawson KA Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis: does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory J Mem Lang 2009 60 437 47 10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.004
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Crowder R. The effects of repetition. In: Principles of learning and Memory, pp. 264–321. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1976.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Landauer TK, Bjork RA. Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning. In: Practical Aspects of Memory, pp. 625–32. London: Academic Press; 1987.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Balota DA Duchek JM Sergent-Marshall SD Roediger HL Does expanded retrieval produce benefits over equal interval spacing? Explorations of spacing effects in healthy aging and early stage Alzheimer’s disease Psych Aging 2006 21 19 31 10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.19
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Logan JM Balota DA Expanded vs. equal interval spaced retrieval practice: exploration of schedule of spacing and retention interval in younger and older adults Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 2008 15 3 257 80 10.1080/13825580701322171
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Karpicke JD Roediger HL Expanding retrieval practice promotes short-term retention, but equally spaced retrieval enhances long-term retention J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2007 33 704 19 10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.704 17576148
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kane MT Crooks TJ Cohen AS Designing and evaluating standard-setting procedures for licensure and certification tests Adv Health Sci Educ 1999 4 195 207 10.1023/A:1009849528247
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bernard H Thayer JD Streeter EA Diligence and academic performance J Res Christ Educ 1993 2 213 34 10.1080/10656219309484785
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
The effect of student diligence, diligence support systems, self-efficacy, and locus of control on academic achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Tennessee State University, 2007.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Heffler B. Individual learning style and the learning style inventory Educ Stud 2001 27 307 16 10.1080/03055690120076583
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bernard H Schuttenberg EM Development of the diligence inventory-higher education form J Res Dev Educ 1995 28 91 100
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Barrow M Reilly B Woodfield R. The determinants of undergraduate degree performance: how important is gender? Br Educ Res J 2009 35 575 97 10.1080/01411920802642322
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bruinsma M Jansen EPWA When will I succeed in my first-year diploma? Survival analysis in Dutch higher education High Educ Res Dev 2009 28 99 114 10.1080/07294360802444396
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Masui C Broeckmans J Doumen S Groenen A Molenberghs G. Do diligent students perform better? Complex relations between student and course characteristics, study time, and academic performance in higher education Stud High Educ 2014 39 621 43 10.1080/03075079.2012.721350
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Evans DJR Zeun P Stanier RA Motivating student learning using a formative assessment J Anat 2014 224 296 303 10.1111/joa.12117 24111930
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

What is more effective: a daily or a weekly formative test?

Abstract

Paradigm

My account