Designing for Openness, Critical Digital Competence and Agency: The Development of the CoDiCri ACAD Toolkit
References
- Agbo, F. J., Oyelere, S. S., Suhonen, J., & Laine, T. H. (2021). Co-design of mini games for learning computational thinking in an online environment. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 5815–5849. 10.1007/s10639-021-10515-1
- Amiel, T., & Reeves, T. C. (2008). Design-based research and educational technology: Rethinking technology and the research agenda. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 29–40.
- Bali, M., Cronin, C., & Jhangiani, R. S. (2020). Framing open educational practices from a social justice perspective. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1), 1–12. 10.5334/jime.565
- Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14. 10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
- Biesta, G. J. J. (2013). Giving teaching back to education: Responding to the disappearance of the teacher. Phenomenology & Practice, 6(2),
35 . 10.29173/pandpr19860 - Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132–149. 10.1080/02660830.2007.11661545
- Boulord, C., Le Borgne, Y.-A., & Corieri, P. (2024).
Informal education practices for human–AI creative pedagogy for accessibility and inclusivity . In A. Urmeneta & M. Romero (Eds.), Creative applications of artificial intelligence in education (pp. 89–99). Springer Nature. 10.1007/978-3-031-55272-4_7 - Bower, M., & Vlachopoulos, P. (2018). A critical analysis of technology-enhanced learning design frameworks. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(6), 981–997. 10.1111/bjet.12668
- Carvalho, L., Castañeda, L., & Yeoman, P. (2023). The ‘birth of doubt’ and ‘the existence of other possibilities’: Exploring how the ACAD toolkit supports design for learning. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(2), Article
2 . 10.7821/naer.2023.7.1494 - Carvalho, L., Czerniewicz, L., & Lamb, J. (2024). Positive, postdigital spaces for learning. Postdigital Science and Education, 6(4), 1334–1349. 10.1007/s42438-024-00523-y
- Carvalho, L., & Goodyear, P. (2018). Design, learning networks and service innovation. Design Studies, 55, 27–53. 10.1016/j.destud.2017.09.003
- Carvalho, L., & Yeoman, P. (2019). Connecting the dots: Theorizing and mapping learning entanglement through archaeology and design. British Journal of Educational Technology. 10.1111/bjet.12761
- Castañeda, L., Arnab, S., Tur, G., Klykken, F., Wasson, B., Haba-Ortuño, I., Maloszek, R., & Benito-Crosetti, B. D. (2024). Co-creating pedagogically informed games for data literacy. Revista de Educación, 1, 39–69. 10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2024-405-627
- Castañeda, L., & Selwyn, N. (2018). More than tools? Making sense of the ongoing digitizations of higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15,
22 . 10.1186/s41239-018-0109-y - Castañeda, L., & Williamson, B. (2021). Assembling new toolboxes of methods and theories for innovative critical research on educational technology. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(1), Article
1 . 10.7821/naer.2021.1.703 - Chan, K., & Stacey, P. (2022). Desirable difficulties and student-faculty partnership. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 59(3), 242–252. 10.1080/14703297.2020.1861964
- Conole, G. (2008).
The role of mediating artefacts in learning design . In L. Lockyer, S. Bennett, S. Agostinho, & B. Harper (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: Issues, applications and technologies (pp. 108–208). Information Science Reference. 10.4018/978-1-59904-861-1.ch008 - Cook-Sather, A. (2020). Respecting voices: How the co-creation of teaching and learning can support academic staff, underrepresented students, and equitable practices. Higher Education, 79(5), 885–901. 10.1007/s10734-019-00445-w
- Council Recommendation on Improving the Provision of Digital Skills and Competences in Education and Training. (C/2024/1030). (2023).
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1030/oj/eng - Cronin, C. (2020).
Open education: Walking a critical path . In D. Conrad & P. Prinsloo (Eds.), Open(ing) education: theory and practice (pp. 9–25). Brill.https://brill.com/view/title/56897 - Cronin, C., & MacLaren, I. (2018). Conceptualising OEP: A review of theoretical and empirical literature in open educational practices. Open Praxis, 10(2), 127–143. 10.5944/openpraxis.10.2.825
- Esteve-Mon, F. M., Postigo-Fuentes, A. Y., & Castañeda, L. (2023). A strategic approach of the crucial elements for the implementation of digital tools and processes in higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 77(3), 558–573. 10.1111/hequ.12411
- Fawns, T. (2022). An entangled pedagogy: Looking beyond the pedagogy—Technology dichotomy. Postdigital Science and Education. 10.1007/s42438-022-00302-7
- Gartner, J., & Wagner, I. (1996). Mapping actors and agendas: Political frameworks of systems design and participation. Human–Computer Interaction, 11(3), 187–214. 10.1207/s15327051hci1103_1
- Goodyear, P., Carvalho, L., & Yeoman, P. (2021). Activity-centred analysis and design (ACAD): Core purposes, distinctive qualities and current developments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 445–464. 10.1007/s11423-020-09926-7
- Goodyear, P., Carvalho, L., Yeoman, P., Castañeda, L., & Adell, J. (2021). Una herramienta tangible para facilitar procesos de diseño y análisis didáctico: Traducción y adaptación transcultural del Toolkit ACAD. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 60, 7–28. 10.12795/pixelbit.84457
- Gourlay, L. (2021). There is no ‘virtual learning’: The materiality of digital education. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(1), 1–10. 10.7821/naer.2021.1.649
- Gourlay, L. (2023).
Postdigital/more-than-digital: Ephemerality, seclusion, and copresence in the university . In P. Jandrić, A. MacKenzie, & J. Knox (Eds.), Postdigital Research: Genealogies, Challenges, and Future Perspectives (pp. 51–68). Springer Nature. 10.1007/978-3-031-31299-1_4 - Knox, J., Williamson, B., & Bayne, S. (2020). Machine behaviourism: Future visions of ‘learnification’ and ‘datafication’ across humans and digital technologies. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(1), 31–45. 10.1080/17439884.2019.1623251
- Lewin, C., Cranmer, S., & McNicol, S. (2018). Developing digital pedagogy through learning design: An activity theory perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(6), 1131–1144. 10.1111/bjet.12705
- Marín, V. I., & Castañeda, L. (2023).
Developing digital literacy for teaching and learning . In O. Zawacki-Richter & I. Jung (Eds.), Handbook of open, distance and digital education (pp. 1089–1108). Springer Nature. 10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6_64 - Marín, V. I., Tur, G., Castañeda, L., Peguera-Carré, M. C., Orellana, M. L., Villagrá, S., & Carrera, X. (2025). Agencia y aprendizaje en la Educación Superior: Una revisión sistemática. UTE Teaching & Technology (Universitas Tarraconensis), 1, Article
1 . 10.17345/ute.2025.4035 - Miao, F., & Cukurova, M. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO. 10.54675/ZJTE2084
- Mor, Y., Cook, J., Santos, P., Treasure-Jones, T., Elferink, R., Holley, D., & Griffin, J. (2015).
Patterns of practice and design: Towards an agile methodology for educational design research . In G. Conole, T. Klobučar, C. Rensing, J. Konert, & E. Lavoué (Eds.), Design for teaching and learning in a networked world (pp. 605–608). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-319-24258-3_69 - Oliver, M. (2016).
What is technology . In N. Rushby & D. Surry (Eds.), Wiley handbook of learning technology (Edición: 1). Wiley Handbooks in Education. 10.1002/9781118736494.ch3 - Olney, T., & Wood, C. (2023). Using the theory of practice architectures to establish what it means to “do” learning design, and the arrangements that enable and constrain practice. Frontiers in Education, 8. 10.3389/feduc.2023.1291032
- Peters, M. A., Besley, T., & Jandrić, P. (2018). Postdigital knowledge cultures and their politics. ECNU Review of Education, 1(2), 23–43. 10.30926/ecnuroe2018010202
- Peters, M. A., & Green, B. J. (2024). Wisdom in the age of AI education. Postdigital Science and Education, 6(4), 1173–1195. 10.1007/s42438-024-00460-w
- Pötzsch, H. (2019). Critical digital literacy: Technology in education beyond issues of user competence and labour-market qualifications. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 17(2), 221–240. 10.31269/triplec.v17i2.1093
- Schön, D. (1984). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
- Selwyn, N. (2022). The future of AI and education: Some cautionary notes. European Journal of Education, 57(4), Article
4 . 10.1111/ejed.12532 - Stenalt, M. H., & Lassesen, B. (2022). Does student agency benefit student learning? A systematic review of higher education research. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(5), 653–669. 10.1080/02602938.2021.1967874
- Thomas, J., Graziosi, S., Brunton, J., Ghouze, Z., O’Driscoll, P., & Bond, M. (2020). EPPI-Reviewer: Advanced software for systematic reviews, maps and evidence synthesis. EPPI-Centre Software. UCL Social Research Institute.
https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=2914
DOI: https://doi.org/10.65043/eurodl.179 | Journal eISSN: 1027-5207
Language: English
Page range: 6 - 6
Submitted on: Oct 27, 2025
Accepted on: Mar 23, 2026
Published on: Apr 24, 2026
Published by: EDEN Digital Learning Europe
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2026 Linda Castañeda, Victoria I. Marin, Gemma Tur, Maria Carme Peguera-Carré, Martha Lucía Orellana-Hernández, Sara Villagrá, published by EDEN Digital Learning Europe
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.