Transactional Distance Revisited: A Review for the Case of Hybrid Education
References
- Athens, W. (2023). Self-regulation, motivation, and outcomes in HyFlex classrooms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(4), 1765–1783. 10.1007/s11423-023-10243-y
- Bischoff, W. R., Bisconer, S. W., Kooker, B. M., & Woods, L. C. (1996). Transactional distance and interactive television in the distance education of health professionals. American Journal of Distance Education, 10(3), 4–19. 10.1080/08923649609526937
- Bolliger, D. U., & Halupa, C. (2018). Online student perceptions of engagement, transactional distance, and outcomes. Distance Education, 39(3), 299–316. 10.1080/01587919.2018.1476845
- Bower, M., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G. E., Lee, M. J. W., & Kenney, J. (2015). Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysis. Computers & Education, 86, 1–17. 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.006
- Chan, T. K. (2024). Implementing chroma key compositing with a green screen to improve the learning experience of remote students during synchronous hybrid lectures. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 14687–14713. 10.1007/s10639-023-12442-9
- Conklina, S., Oyarzun, B., & Barreto, D. (2017). Blended synchronous learning environment: Student perspectives. Research on Education and Media, 9(1), 17–23. 10.1515/rem-2017-0004
- Divanoglou, A., Chance-Larsen, K., Fleming, J., & Wolfe, M. (2018). Physiotherapy student perspectives on synchronous dual-campus learning and teaching. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3). 10.14742/ajet.3460
- Francisco-Pérez, J., Medina-Maldonado, V., Ortiz-Francisco, G., Blanco, M.-R., & Bates, B.-R. (2023). Unveiling the post-pandemic hybrid education: students’ and professors’ perspectives on the contingent virtual education modality. Revista Electrónica Calidad En La Educación Superior, 14(2), Article
2 . 10.22458/caes.v14i2.4876 - Gleason, B. W., & Greenhow, C. (2017). Hybrid education: The potential of teaching and learning with robot-mediated communication. Online Learning, 21(4). 10.24059/olj.v21i4.1276
- Kassandrinou, A., Angelaki, C., & Mavroidis, I. (2014). Transactional distance among open university students: How does it affect the learning process? European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 17(1), 26–42. 10.2478/eurodl-2014-0002
- Lakhal, S., Mukamurera, J., Bédard, M.-E., Heilporn, G., & Chauret, M. (2021). Students and instructors perspective on blended synchronous learning in a Canadian graduate program. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(5), 1383–1396. 10.1111/jcal.12578
- Moore, M. G. (1972). Learner autonomy: The second dimension of independent learning. Convergence, 5(2),
76 . - Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7. 10.1080/08923648909526659
- Moore, M. G. (1993). Editorial: Is teaching like Flying? A total systems view of distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 7(1), 1–10. 10.1080/08923649309526806
- Moore, M. (1997).
Theory of transactional distance . In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical Principles of Distance Education (pp. 22–38.), Routledge. - Moore, M. G. (2018).
The theory of transactional distance . In M. G. Moore & W. C. Diehl (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (4th ed., pp. 32–46). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315296135-4 - Murray, A., Roy, S., Hahn, M., & Voglewede, P. (2021). Did the student-instructor and peer-to-peer divide widen with instructional changes during COVID-19? EdArXiv. 10.35542/osf.io/fkw32
- Nussli, N., & Oh, K. (2024). Creating a “Space In-Between”: Learning on the physical–hybrid–virtual continuum. Journal of Educational Technology Systems,
00472395241252139 . 10.1177/00472395241252139 - Nussli, N., Oh, K., & Davis, J. P. (2022). Capturing the successes and failures during pandemic teaching: An investigation of university students’ perceptions of their faculty’s emergency remote teaching approaches. E-Learning and Digital Media,
20427530221147112 . 10.1177/20427530221147112 - Ottenheim, V. L., Meulenbroeks, R., & Drijvers, P. (2025). Transactional distance and interaction in hybrid education: A case study. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 27(1), 44–62. 10.2478/eurodl-2025-0003
- Paul, R. C., Swart, W., Zhang, A. M., & MacLeod, K. R. (2015). Revisiting Zhang’s scale of transactional distance: Refinement and validation using structural equation modeling. Distance Education, 36(3), 364–382. 10.1080/01587919.2015.1081741
- Phelps, A., & Vlachopoulos, D. (2020). Successful transition to synchronous learning environments in distance education: A research on entry-level synchronous facilitator competencies. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 1511–1527. 10.1007/s10639-019-09989-x
- Raes, A. (2022). Exploring student and teacher experiences in hybrid learning environments: Does presence matter? Postdigital Science and Education, 4(1), 138–159. 10.1007/s42438-021-00274-0
- Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I., & Depaepe, F. (2020). A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: Gaps identified. Learning Environments Research, 23(3), 269–290. 10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z
- Roberts, P., Scott, S. V., Cranney, J., Cumming, T. M., Angstmann, E., Nehme, M., & Watson, K. (2024). Design principles for dual mode readiness in an uncertain future. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 240–250. 10.1080/14703297.2022.2147094
- Şat, M., İLhan, F., & Yukselturk, E. (2022). Web tools as e-icebreakers in online education. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 5(3), 721–737. 10.31681/jetol.1084512
- Shearer, R. L., & Park, E. (2019).
The theory of transactional distance . In Open and distance education theory revisited: Implications for the digital Era (pp. 31–38). Singapore: Springer Singapore. - Szeto, E., & Cheng, A. Y. N. (2016). Towards a framework of interactions in a blended synchronous learning environment: What effects are there on students’ social presence experience? Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 487–503. 10.1080/10494820.2014.881391
- Tierney, A., Hopwood, I., & Davies, S. (2023). Staff and student experiences of hybrid teaching in a pandemic-impacted context. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 19,
017 . 10.58459/rptel.2024.19017 - Vasiloudis, G., Koutsouba, M., Giossos, Y., & Mavroidis, I. (2015). Transactional distance and autonomy in a distance learning environment. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 18(1), 114–122. 10.1515/eurodl-2015-0008
- Wang, Q., & Huang, Q. (2024). Engaging Online Learners in Blended Synchronous Learning: A Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 594–607. 10.1109/TLT.2023.3282278
- Wang, Q., Quek, C. L., & Hu, X. (2017). Designing and improving a blended synchronous learning environment: An educational design research. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3). 10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.3034
- Xiao, J. (2024). Revisiting the theory of transactional distance: Implications for open, distance, and digital education in the 21st century. American Journal of Distance Education, 39(1), 113–126. 10.1080/08923647.2024.2303328
- Zhang, A. (2003). Transactional distance in web-based college learning environments: Toward measurement and theory construction [Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Commonwealth University]. Retrospective ETD Collection.
https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd_retro/94 - Zydney, J., Mckimmy, P., Lindberg, R., & Schmidt, M. (2018). Here or there instruction: Lessons learned in implementing innovative approaches to blended synchronous learning. TechTrends, 63, 123–132. 10.1007/s11528-018-0344-z
DOI: https://doi.org/10.65043/eurodl.173 | Journal eISSN: 1027-5207
Language: English
Page range: 10 - 10
Submitted on: Oct 10, 2025
Accepted on: Oct 13, 2025
Published on: Oct 24, 2025
Published by: EDEN Digital Learning Europe
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
© 2025 Veerle Ottenheim, Ralph Meulenbroeks, Paul Drijvers, published by EDEN Digital Learning Europe
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.